- Case report
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Separated right and left ventricular excitation during right ventricular septal pacing in a patient with narrow QRS wave: a case report
© Yaegashi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
- Received: 26 December 2013
- Accepted: 17 March 2014
- Published: 21 May 2014
Right ventricular septal pacing is thought to be better than right ventricular apical pacing for shortening the QRS duration and for preserving left ventricular function. However, right ventricular septal pacing may not be effective in all cases. In this case report, we present a rare case in which right ventricular septal pacing induced thoroughly separated right and left ventricular excitation despite the presence of a relatively narrow QRS wave during atrium-only pacing.
We report a case of 63-year-old Japanese man with cardiomyopathy with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement for ventricular tachycardia. Three years after implantation, he developed second-degree atrio-ventricular block. Therefore, atrio-ventricular sequential pacing was started; then his heart failure was much worsened. His electrocardiogram showed a dissociated biphasic QRS wave during right ventricular high-septal pacing, despite the presence of a non-fragmented QRS morphology during atrium-only pacing. An activation map during right ventricular high-septal pacing showed that right ventricular conduction started at the pacing site and ended at the right ventricular basal inferior site. Subsequently after a 10ms interval, left ventricular conduction started at the left ventricular posteroseptum and ended at the left ventricular lateral wall. These data indicate that during right ventricular high-septal pacing, the first component of the QRS wave supposedly reflects only right ventricular excitation and the second component only left ventricular excitation. Also due to the intracardiac electrograms, it was assumed that this phenomenon was caused by transversely limited severe transseptal conduction disturbance.
It should be noted that even ventricular septal pacing could evoke harmful interventricular dyssynchrony due to transversely limited severe septal conduction disturbance, despite the presence of a relatively narrow QRS wave.
- Right Ventricular
- Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
- Cardiac Sarcoidosis
- Pace Site
- Right Ventricular Apical Pace
A prolonged duration of the QRS complex on electrocardiogram is associated with adverse prognosis not only in patients with cardiac diseases[1, 2] but also in the general population. Right ventricular (RV) septal pacing is thought to be better than RV apical pacing for shortening the QRS duration and for preserving left ventricular (LV) function[4, 5]. However, there are no apparent data suggesting that RV septal pacing is better than RV apical pacing for patients’ prognosis.
In this report, we present a case in which RV septal pacing induced thoroughly separated RV and LV excitation and contraction.
It was reported that RV septal pacing might induce intraventricular LV dyssynchrony causing severe LV ejection fraction deterioration and symptoms of congestive heart failure. However, septal pacing-induced interventricular dyssynchrony has not been reported. In this case, an ECG of the patient during RV high-septal pacing as well as during LV lateral or RV apical pacing showed a biphasic QRS complex, and this QRS morphology supposedly reflects completely separated RV and LV excitations, although the intrinsic QRS morphology in this case showed only a mild intraventricular conduction disturbance pattern.
In a previous study on patients with left bundle-branch block, two patterns of initiation of LV septal activation were observed: (1) via slow conduction through the left bundle branch and (2) via right-to-left transseptal activation. In the former pattern, the earliest LV activation occurred in the mid-septum by slow conduction through the left posterior fascicle, whereas in the latter pattern, the earliest LV activation occurred in the high septum. In the present case, the earliest LV activation started at the mid-septum during atrium-only pacing and at the basal posterior septum during the RV high-septal pacing. In addition, while intracardiac mapping was performed, fragmented potentials were recorded in the posteroseptal area during atrium-only pacing (Figure 3B), and double potentials were recorded in the same area during RV septal pacing (Figure 3D); this shows that severe conduction disturbance may have been present around this region on the working myocardium, and that myocardial excitation rose from the RV septal pacing site conducted very slowly through this damaged area transversely.
During atrium-only pacing, RV and LV excitation started and ended almost simultaneously within 166ms. During RV septal pacing, RV and LV excitation occurred sequentially; however, intraventricular conduction durations of the right and left ventricles measured by activation mapping were comparatively shorter than those during atrium-only pacing (83ms and 133ms in the right and left ventricles, respectively); therefore, it seems that each intraventricular conduction uses some intact cardiac conduction system.
We experienced a rare case of idiopathic cardiomyopathy that showed a dissociated biphasic wide QRS complex and completely separated RV and LV contractions during RV high-septal pacing due to transversely limited severe transseptal conduction disturbance, despite the presence of a relatively narrow QRS wave during atrium-only pacing. Although RV septal pacing can usually achieve more physiological ventricular contraction than RV apical pacing, it should be noted that even septal pacing could evoke harmful interventricular dyssynchrony.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Kashani A, Barold SS: Significance of QRS complex duration in patients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005, 46 (12): 2183-2192. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.071.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zimetbaum PJ, Buxton AE, Batsford W, Fisher JD, Hafley GE, Lee KL, O’Toole MF, Page RL, Reynolds M, Josephson ME: Electrocardiographic predictors of arrhythmic death and total mortality in the multicenter unsustained tachycardia trial. Circulation. 2004, 110 (7): 766-769. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000139311.32278.32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aro AL, Anttonen O, Tikkanen JT, Junttila MJ, Kerola T, Rissanen HA, Reunanen A, Huikuri HV: Intraventricular conduction delay in a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram as a predictor of mortality in the general population. Circ Arrhythm Electrocphysiol. 2011, 4 (5): 704-710. 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.963561.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mond HG, Vlay SG: Pacing the right ventricular septum: time to abandon apical pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010, 33 (11): 1293-1297. 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02876.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tse HF, Wong KK, Siu CW, Zhang XH, Ho WY, Lau CP: Upgrading pacemaker patients with right ventricular apical pacing to right ventricular septal pacing improves left ventricular performance and functional capacity. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009, 20 (8): 901-905. 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01470.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ouali S, Azzez S, Kacem S, Lagren A, Neffeti E, Gribaa R, Ramedi F, Boughzela E: Acute left ventricular dysfunction secondary to right ventricular septal pacing in a woman with initial preserved contractility: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2011, 5: 524-10.1186/1752-1947-5-524.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez LM, Timmermans C, Nabar A, Beatty G, Wellens HJ: Variable patterns of septal activation in patients with left bundle branch block and heart failure. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003, 14 (2): 135-141. 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.02421.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.