- Case report
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Delayed surgical treatment for a traumatic bilateral cervical facet joint dislocation using a posterior-anterior approach: a case report
© Shimada et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
- Received: 17 July 2012
- Accepted: 20 November 2012
- Published: 9 January 2013
There have been few reports of patients with bilateral cervical facet dislocations that remain untreated for eight weeks or more. We report the case of a 76-year-old man with an old bilateral cervical facet joint dislocation fracture that was treated by posterior-anterior reduction and fixation.
A 76-year-old Asian man was involved in a road traffic accident. He presented with neck pain and arm pain on his right side, but motor weakness and paralysis were not observed. He was treated conservatively; however, instability and spondylolisthesis at the C5 to C6 joint increased eight weeks after the injury. We performed a posterior-anterior reduction and fixation. After surgery, bony union was achieved, and his neck pain and arm pain disappeared.
We recommend reduction and fixation surgery if a patient has an old bilateral facet joint dislocation fracture in the cervical spine.
- Cervical Spine
- Neck Pain
- Cervical Spine Injury
- Bony Union
- Dislocation Fracture
Several authors have reported failures to correctly diagnose cervical spine injuries. The rate of misdiagnosis ranges from 5% to 20% [1–3]. Of missed spinal injuries, misdiagnosis of an injury to the cervical spine has been most frequently reported . The use of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can improve the accuracy of cervical spine injury diagnosis. However, an analysis of the clinical records of 367 patients with cervical spine injuries revealed a diagnostic failure rate of 4.9% .
Treatment for acute cervical dislocation fracture includes conservative treatment and surgery. Whether conservative treatment is sufficient is controversial [5–7]. Recently, the incidence of surgical treatment to reduce dislocation and for fixation has increased compared with conservative treatment.
An injury is considered as ‘old’ when the interval between the accident and correct diagnosis is longer than three weeks . There are several reports on the management of old dislocations of the subaxial cervical spine in the English literature [9–13]. Among these, only three articles were found in which the delayed treatment of bilateral cervical facet dislocations is described after a diagnostic delay of more than one month [9–11].
Here, we report a case of a 76-year-old man with an old bilateral cervical facet joint dislocation fracture that was treated by posterior-anterior reduction and fixation.
A 76-year-old Asian man was involved in a road traffic accident. He presented with neck and arm pain on his right side, but motor weakness and paralysis were not observed. His arm pain corresponded to the right C6 and C7 dermatomes.
We planned posterior-anterior surgery eight weeks after the injury. We performed a partial resection of both C5 to C6 facet joints for reduction, using a posterior approach. Half of the C5 to C6 facet joint was resected on the right side, and one quarter of the C5 to C6 facet joint was resected on the left side.
Lateral mass screws on the left side were used for fixation, and bilateral local bone was grafted between the posterior surface of the C5 and C6 laminae. Lateral mass screws on the right side were not used for fixation because most of the lateral bone mass was resected. Because fixation was insufficient, we added an anterior approach by removing the C5 to C6 intervertebral disc, and grafted iliac bone into the C5 to C6 space. We used a titanium plate for fixation.
We present the case of an old bilateral cervical facet joint dislocation fracture found in a 76-year-old man, treated by posterior-anterior reduction and fixation. After surgery, bony union was achieved, and our patient’s neck pain and arm pain disappeared.
In one study, cervical spine injuries were identified in 740 patients and the diagnosis was delayed or missed in 34 patients (4.6%). Ten of the 34 patients (29%) developed permanent sequelae as a result of these delays . In another study, 1331 patients were evaluated following blunt trauma injury; recognition of their cervical spine injury was delayed in 8% of patients . In a review of 253 patients with 274 spinal injuries, delays in diagnosis were documented in 22.9% of cervical injuries and 4.9% of thoracolumbar injuries . We therefore carefully consider the potential misdiagnosis of cervical injury before therapy. In our patient, even with slight cervical spondylolisthesis, plain X-rays were not sufficient for a proper diagnosis. In general, such a finding requires further diagnostic efforts including a CT scan.
Currently, there is evidence in several articles that closed reduction in an awake and alert patient is relatively safe [14, 15]. There is, however, no agreement regarding whether such a maneuver is safe in an obtunded or intubated patient. Most surgeons would agree that an open reduction with or without a decompression should be considered in patients where there is MRI evidence of a failed closed reduction or what is considered to be a dangerous herniated disc before reduction . We had attempted closed reduction while our patient was awake, but this failed. We therefore selected open reduction.
A few authors have reported surgical treatment for old dislocations of the subaxial cervical spine, including bilateral facet joint dislocation. The fusion rate and improvement in symptoms after surgery were excellent in all but one of 16 surgically treated patients who had sustained an old injury of their lower cervical spine, including dislocation . Reduction and fusion surgery was performed in 12 patients with an old dislocation of the lower cervical spine, including bilateral dislocation of the facet joints, and all patients developed bone fusion and showed neurological improvement . There has been a report of three patients who had older (>8 weeks) untreated bilateral cervical facet dislocation. All three patients were surgically treated . In a neurologically intact 51-year-old patient, surgical treatment was performed 10 weeks after the trauma upon diagnosis of bilateral cervical facet dislocation at the C5 to C6 joint. That patient remained neurologically intact and radiographic fusion was observed . In our case, our patient with an old bilateral cervical facet joint dislocation fracture underwent surgery; complete reduction was performed, and bony fusion was observed. We therefore recommend reduction and fixation surgery if the patient has an old bilateral cervical facet joint dislocation fracture.
Several authors have reported surgical methods for patients with old bilateral cervical facet joint dislocation fractures using anterior and posterior approaches, and a combination of the two with instrumentation [9–11]. The use of pedicle screws for patients with old bilateral cervical facet joint dislocation fractures has not been frequently reported. Yamazaki et al. reported a case of an old fracture-dislocation unilaterally at a C4 to C5 facet joint. Reduction of the deformity and spinal fusion were successfully performed using a pedicle screw-rod system . Lee et al. reported that, when patients were neurologically intact, an anterior approach was more commonly chosen than a posterior approach, and combined approaches were more commonly chosen for bilateral facet injuries . In our case, we selected a bilateral posterior facetectomy, unilateral lateral mass screws and anterior plating for our patient. To reduce the facet joint, half of the C5 to C6 facet joint was resected on the right side, and one quarter of the C5 to C6 facet joint was resected on the left. We considered an anterior plate to be insufficient for stabilization. Furthermore, half of the C5 to C6 facet joint was resected, so we could not use lateral mass screws on the right side.
Several surgical methods are recommended for old bilateral cervical facet dislocation fractures. We recommend these methods be further investigated to identify those that achieve good reduction and fixation without complications.
We have reported a case of an old bilateral cervical facet joint dislocation fracture found in a 76-year-old man, treated by posterior-anterior reduction and fixation. After surgery, his neck pain and arm pain disappeared and bony union was achieved. We recommend reduction and fixation surgery for patients with an old dislocation fracture of the cervical spine.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal. The protocols for human procedures used in this study were approved by the ethics committee of our institution.
- Davis JW, Phreaner DL, Hoyt DB, Mackersie RC: The etiology of missed cervical spine injuries. J Trauma. 1993, 34: 342-346. 10.1097/00005373-199303000-00006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gerrelts BD, Petersen EU, Mabry J, Petersen SR: Delayed diagnosis of cervical spine injuries. J Trauma. 1991, 31: 1622-1626. 10.1097/00005373-199112000-00010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reid DC, Henderson R, Saboe L, Miller JD: Etiology and clinical course of missed spine fractures. J Trauma. 1987, 27: 980-986. 10.1097/00005373-198709000-00005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Platzer P, Hauswirth N, Jaindl M, Chatwani S, Vecsei V, Gaebler C: Delayed or missed diagnosis of cervical spine injuries. J Trauma. 2006, 61: 150-155. 10.1097/01.ta.0000196673.58429.2a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beyer CA, Cabanela ME: Unilateral facet dislocations and fracture dislocations of the cervical spine: a review. Orthopedics. 1992, 15: 311-315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fehlings MG, Sekhon LHS, Tator C: The role and timing of decompression in acute spinal cord injury. Spine. 2001, 26: S101-S110. 10.1097/00007632-200112151-00017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee AS, MacLean JCB, Newton DA: Rapid traction for reduction of cervical spine dislocations. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994, 76B: 352-356.Google Scholar
- Roy-Camille R, Edward B, Zeller R, Lapresle P: Les Lesions Traumatiques Anciennes du Rachis Cervical Inferieure. Rachis cervical inferieure, 6mes journees d’Orthopedie de la Pitie. 1988, Paris: Masson, 139-146.Google Scholar
- Hassan MG: Treatment of old dislocations of the lower cervical spine. Int Orthop. 2002, 26: 263-267. 10.1007/s00264-002-0350-8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bartels RH, Donk R: Delayed management of traumatic bilateral cervical facet dislocation: surgical strategy. Report of three cases. J Neurosurg. 2002, 97: 362-365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Payer M, Tessitore E: Delayed surgical management of a traumatic bilateral cervical facet dislocation by an anterior-posterior-anterior approach. J Clin Neurosci. 2007, 14: 782-786. 10.1016/j.jocn.2006.04.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamazaki M, Okawa A, Akazawa T, Koda M: Usefulness of 3-dimensional full-scale modeling for preoperative simulation of surgery in a patient with old unilateral cervical fracture-dislocation. Spine. 2007, 32: E532-E536. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318133fcdf.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Korres DS, Nikiforidis P, Babis GC, Vlachou C, Lykomitros V, Andreakos A: Old injuries of the lower cervical spine treated surgically. J Spinal Disorders. 1995, 8: 509-515.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vaccaro AR, Falatyn SP, Flanders AE, Balderston RA, Northrup BE, Cotler JM: Magnetic resonance evaluation of the intervertebral disc, spinal ligaments, and spinal cord before and after closed traction reduction of cervical spine dislocations. Spine. 1999, 24: 1210-1217. 10.1097/00007632-199906150-00007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grant GA, Morza SK, Chapman JR, Winn HR, Newell DW, Jones DT, Grady MS: Risk of early closed reduction in cervical spine subluxation injuries. J Neurosurg. 1999, 90: 13-18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee JY, Nassr A, Eck JC, Vaccaro AR: Controversies in the treatment of cervical spine dislocations. Spine J. 2009, 9: 418-423. 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.01.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.