This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Adjustment of traumatic femur shortening assisted by an intramedullar skeletal kinetic distractor: a case report
© Rausch et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 22 April 2013
Accepted: 11 July 2013
Published: 23 August 2013
Distal comminuted femoral fractures with joint involvement are highly challenging for the surgeon. We present a potential therapeutic concept that aims especially at the treatment of posttraumatic leg length discrepancy.
This case report describes a polytraumatized 19-year-old German woman. Among other injuries she had a third grade open distal comminuted femoral fracture with a long distance metaphyseal osseous defect. As a primary care procedure an external fixation was applied at first. On day 13, an open reconstruction of her distal femur and the articular surface was performed by screw osteosynthesis, shortening and intramedullary nailing. Due to delayed osseous consolidation an autologous cancellous bone grafting was performed twice. In addition to the second cancellous bone graft an allogeneic cortical bone graft was implemented. A 6.5cm posttraumatic leg length shortening after osseous consolidation was the result. The entire leg length shortening was successfully treated 16 months after her accident with the help of an intramedullar skeletal kinetic distractor.
With the help of the current case report of a patient with polytrauma and a third grade open distal comminuted femoral fracture with joint involvement and a long distance osseous defect, we present a potential therapeutic concept that aims especially at the treatment of posttraumatic leg length discrepancy.
Distal comminuted femoral fractures with joint involvement are highly challenging for the surgeon. Resulting posttraumatic discrepancy of leg length leads to an awry pelvis and the compensation mechanism causes a scoliosis. We present a potential therapeutic concept that aims especially at the treatment of posttraumatic leg length discrepancy. The use of an external fixation is the most common technique used with its capability of leg lengthening and correction in axis deviation. In this case report the limb length compensation was performed with, after ruling out any angular or rotational deformities, the implant of an intramedullar skeletal kinetic distractor (ISKD; Orthofix, Ottobrun, Germany). In the case of the right indication, and by using it correctly, this device rises well above other lengthening devices being used currently.
During further progression the osseous consolidation was delayed. For that reason, an autogenous cancellous iliac crest bone graft was carried out 3 months after the implantation of the SCN. Due to still missing consolidation after 9 further weeks, a second autologous cancellous and cortical bone graft out of her back iliac crest was implemented. During both surgeries the SCN was not revised. It followed a continuous progress of the osseous consolidation.
The leg shortening on the patient’s right side was primarily treated with a 6.5cm shoe sole compensation that did not satisfy the patient due to limited function and cosmetic reasons. Therefore a lengthening of the right femur was planned. With the help of a computed tomography scan the precise difference in leg length was measured and the eventual deviation in axis and rotation were defined. With these data the clinical-defined leg length difference of 6.5cm was confirmed; a deviation of the axis or torsion was ruled out. So 14 months after the trauma an ISKD was implanted.
Posttraumatic discrepancy of leg length leads to an awry pelvis and the compensation mechanism causes a scoliosis. This type of pathologic posture can cause severe pain in joints of the lower extremities and the spine. One method to compensate for the difference in length is orthopedic shoes. This results not only in a cosmetic problem for the patient, but also creates high costs. It can furthermore create a conflict with the patient’s profession and restriction of recreation mobility.
The use of an external fixation is the most common technique because of its capability of leg lengthening and correction in axis deformities [1, 2]. This technique can be combined with an intramedular guidance to avoid axial deviation. The drawbacks of this universal technique are a series of complications such as pin infections, osteomyelitis, pin loosening, loss of surgical correction, refracture, and pain due to keloid and to the fixation of tissue that can occur. Not to mention an obviously limited amount of comfort, as well as psychological pressure on the patient due to the visibility of the external fixation [1–3].
By using an ISKD, complications that occur while using an external fixation can be avoided. Due to the intermedullary stabilization and leaving the implant in its place after distraction, secondary refractures and dislocation are avoided and weight-bearing rehabilitation is sped up. In 1978 such a full intramedullary distraction system was presented for the first time . In addition to the ISKD, the Albizzia intramedullary nail is a further developed mechanic system. In order to activate the distraction mechanism of the Albizzia intramedullary nail, it is necessary to create a rotation movement of more than 20 degrees. This can cause severe pain which can often only be managed with help of a short anesthesia or even result in a discontinuation of the treatment [5, 6]. A remaining rotational deformity is a specific complication of this system .
In this case report the limb length compensation was performed with, after ruling out any angular or rotational deformities, the implant of an ISKD. The ISKD nail described by Cole et al. has clearly less complications than the Albizzia nail . Normal daily movement should create enough displacement of the ISKD in order to lengthen it properly.
To prevent common pitfalls like internal malfunction of the lengthening mechanism, runaway nails with insufficient bone regeneration or premature consolidation [2, 8, 9], the patient was evaluated carefully and started physical therapy months before the lengthening. The size of the implant and the site of the osteotomy were planned carefully. The implant had been checked thoroughly before implantation. As an intraoperative complication a fracture at the proximal osteotomy site was seen. We feel this was due to the wide diameter of the chosen nail and the muscular pull that also resulted in a slight abduction of the proximal fragment. Although we did not see any adverse effect this problem should be kept in mind when using an internal distraction system. Immediately after surgery a pain management system was established in collaboration with our pain therapists. During her in-patient stay, she was trained to use the control monitor. She was not released into out-patient care until she was able to perform the leg lengthening device on her own. After releasing her into out-patient care, a sonographic or radiological control followed on a weekly basis in order to control the lengthening process. After 10 weeks the whole lengthening distance was reached. The quick and safe osseous healing is, in our opinion, not least a result of minimal soft tissue damage during surgery, and an internal cancellous bone grafting.
To balance out the limb length discrepancy of the femur after osteosynthesis of a difficult open distal femoral fracture, such as in this case, the ISKD is a suitable implant to use. In the case of the right indication, and by using it correctly, this device rises well above other lengthening devices being used currently.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Bramlage RJ, Lahaye L, Burger C, Mueller M, Wirtz DC, Weber O: Correction of a post-traumatic femoral length difference using an intramedullary distraction nail. Z Orthop. 2010, 148: 585-588. 10.1055/s-0029-1240958.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leidinger B, Winkelmann W, Roedl R: Limb lengthening with a fully implantable mechanical distraction intramedullary nail. Z Orthop. 2006, 144: 419-10.1055/s-2006-942169.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hankemeier S, Gösling T, Pape HC, Wiebking U, Krettek C: Limb lengthening with the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor (ISKD). Opert Orthop Traumatol. 2005, 1: 79-111.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Witt AN, Jäger M, Bruns H, Küsswetter W: An implantable femur distractor for operative leg lengthening. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1978, 92: 291-296. 10.1007/BF02341812.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guichet JM, Deromedis B, Donnan LT, Peretti G, Lascombes P, Bado F: Gradual femoral lengthening with the Albizzia intramedullary nai. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2003, 85: 838-848.Google Scholar
- Guichet JM, Grammont PM, Trauilloud P: A nail for progressive lengthening. An animal experiment with a 2-year follow-up. Chirurgie. 1992, 118: 405-410.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guichet JM: Leg lengthening and correction of deformity using the femoral Albizzia nail. Orthopädie. 1999, 28: 1066-1077.Google Scholar
- Cole JD, Justin D, Kasparis T, DeVlught D, Knobloch C: The intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor (ISKD): first clinical results of a new intramedullary nail for lengthening of the femur and tibia. Injury. 2001, 32 (Suppl 4): 129-139.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kenawey M, Krettek C, Liodakis E, Wiebking U, Hankemeier S: Leg lengthening using intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor: results of 57 consecutive applications. Injury. 2011, 42: 150-155. 10.1016/j.injury.2010.06.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.