This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Viable intrauterine pregnancy after spontaneous bilateral tubal ectopics in a multiparous woman: a case report
© Rani.V.R and Puliyath; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 9 December 2012
Accepted: 26 April 2013
Published: 20 June 2013
Bilateral ectopic pregnancies are increasing due to an increase in the incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease and increase in assisted reproductive techniques. Spontaneous conception after bilateral ectopic pregnancies is extremely rare.
A 33-year-old Indian woman presented with ruptured ectopic pregnancy associated with hemoperitoneum for which she underwent a laparotomy. The diagnosis of bilateral ectopic pregnancies was made during surgery. Salpingectomy was done on one side and the other tube was conserved with salpingostomy. Six months after surgery, she conceived spontaneously and a transvaginal ultrasound examination revealed a 5-weeks live intrauterine pregnancy.
A meticulous surgical technique conserving one fallopian tube resulted in subsequent viable intrauterine pregnancy. The approach to such a case along with steps to minimize tubal damage is presented.
KeywordsBilateral Ectopic Pregnancy Salpingostomy Tubal
In the past few decades the incidence of unusual presentations of ectopic pregnancies has risen along with an increase in assisted reproductive techniques. Spontaneous conception after bilateral tubal ectopic pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of recurrent ectopic pregnancy. It calls for maximum care to prevent tubal damage when conservative surgery is done on the fallopian tube.
A 33-year-old Indian woman presented with irregular and scanty bleeding with occasional abdominal pain for 17 days. There was no history of missed periods and all her previous cycles were regular with normal flow. She has had two full-term vaginal deliveries. The first baby died 52 days after delivery due to pneumonia and the second child is healthy and 7-years old. She has a history of a intrauterine copper contraceptive device insertion 10 months after her second delivery, which was removed 8 months before her presenting symptoms. She was sexually active and not using any contraception for the past 8 months. There was no history suggestive of pelvic inflammatory disease, previous laparotomy or intake of fertility-enhancing drugs.
On examination, the patient was pale, although her vitals were stable. Her abdomen was soft; there was no tenderness or guarding. A pelvic examination revealed mild bleeding per vagina, a normal-sized uterus and left forniceal tenderness. Her urine pregnancy test was positive. With the clinical suspicion of ectopic pregnancy, an emergency ultrasound examination was performed which showed an empty normal-sized uterus and a gestational sac of 5×4cm with a fetal pole having cardiac activity in the left fallopian tube. There was also a moderate amount of fluid in the pouch of Douglas.
Serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) became undetectable 3 weeks after surgery and the woman was advised to report missed periods or irregular bleeding immediately. Seven months later, she came with missed periods and a urine pregnancy test was positive. A serum beta HCG estimation and a transvaginal ultrasound examination at 5 weeks revealed a single intrauterine pregnancy with good fetal cardiac activity. The right tube and both ovaries were normal. The patient continued her pregnancy and eventually delivered a healthy baby at term.
Bilateral tubal ectopic pregnancy is the rarest form of ectopic pregnancy. The incidence is reported to be five in one million deliveries. Many cases are as a result of assisted reproductive techniques.
The postulated mechanisms of bilateral ectopic pregnancy include multiple ovulation, transperitoneal migration of trophoblastic tissue from one tube to another or superfetation. There are case reports on bilateral tubal pregnancy diagnosed with a ruptured ectopic on one tube and chronic ectopic on the other. The criteria for diagnosis of bilateral ectopic pregnancy were first suggested by Fishback and later revised by Norris who stated that microscopic demonstration of chorionic villi in each tube was sufficient for the diagnosis.
The preoperative diagnosis of bilateral ectopic pregnancy remains a challenge. Serum beta HCG estimation is not reliable as the values will be elevated more than that of a single ectopic. Detection with ultrasound scan is difficult and only very few cases have been diagnosed preoperatively by ultrasound.
There are very few case reports in the literature on medical management of bilateral ectopic pregnancies. However, one report showed successful treatment of bilateral ectopics by two consecutive methotrexate injections into the gestational sac under vaginal ultrasonographic guidance. Another report shows failure of single dose methotrexate given for a single ectopic pregnancy which was later diagnosed to be a bilateral ectopic pregnancy. There is also a report on failed conservative management for suspected single ectopic pregnancy which on laparotomy was found to be a bilateral tubal ectopic pregnancy.
During surgery for ectopic pregnancy, inspection of both tubes, ovaries and peritoneal cavity should be done. There are reports of failure to identify one of the bilateral ectopic pregnancies and the patient presenting a few days after surgery with acute abdominal pain. Management options should be discussed with the patient and relatives because of increased risk of recurrent ectopic pregnancy and future infertility.
The fallopian tube derives its blood supply from branches of uterine and ovarian arteries. With an ectopic gestation in the tube, prominent blood vessels are seen in the mesosalpinx supplying the site of the ectopic pregnancy. Ligation of the main vessel of supply before removal of the products of conception by salpingostomy helps in decreasing bleeding from the site of the ectopic pregnancy. It reduces the use of cautery with less damage to the fallopian tubes.
Only two previous reported cases of intrauterine conception following surgery done for bilateral ectopic pregnancy were retrieved after an extensive database search[12, 13]. They were similar to the present case discussed, in that only one tube was conserved during surgery. After bilateral spontaneous ectopics, there is a higher risk for heterotopic pregnancies as the patient has twin proneness.
Bilateral ectopic pregnancies are being managed in different ways. There are case reports where both tubes have been conserved. No guidelines are presently available on this topic.
The present case and two other cases of intrauterine conception after bilateral ectopic pregnancies which have been studied show conservation of only a single fallopian tube[12, 13]. Although the surgical approach was laparotomy, studies have shown that conservation of future fertility and risk of recurrent ectopic pregnancy are the same in laparoscopy and laparotomy. The tubal damage may significantly be reduced by ligating the main feeding vessel in the mesosalpinx prior to salpingostomy.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Eze JN, Obuna JA, Ejikeme BN: Bilateral tubal ectopic pregnancies: a report of two cases. Ann Afr Med. 2012, 11 (2): 112-115. 10.4103/1596-3519.93535.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andrews J, Farell S: Spontaneous bilateral tubal pregnancies: a case report. J Obstet Gynecol Can. 2008, 30 (1): 51-54.Google Scholar
- Edelstein MC, Morgan MA: Bilateral simultaneous tubal pregnancy: case report and review of literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1989, 44 (4): 250-252. 10.1097/00006254-198904000-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tabachnikoff RM, Dada MO, Woods RJ, Rohere D, Myers CP: Bilateral tubal pregnancy: a report of an unusual case. J Reprod Med. 1998, 43 (8): 707-709.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shetty JP, Shetty B, Makkanavar JH, Chandrika : A rare case of bilateral tubal pregnancy. J Indian Med Assoc. 2011, 109 (7): 506-507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Norris S: Bilateral simultaneous tubal pregnancy. Can Med Assoc J. 1953, 68 (4): 379-381.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sentilhes L, Bouet PE, Jalle T, Boussion F, Lefebvre-Lacoeuille C, Descamps P: Ultrasound diagnosis of spontaneous bilateral tubal pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009, 49 (6): 695-696. 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01081.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mock P, Olivennes F, Doumerc S, Frydman R, Fernandez H: Simultaneous bilateral tubal pregnancy after intracytoplasmic sperm injection treated by conservative medical treatment. Interest of sonographic follow-up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001, 94 (1): 155-157. 10.1016/S0301-2115(00)00315-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marcovici I, Scoccia B: Spontaneous bilateral tubal ectopic pregnancy and failed methotrexate therapy: a case report. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997, 177 (6): 1545-1546. 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70109-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marasinghe JP, Condous G, Amarasinghe WI: Spontaneous bilateral tubal ectopic pregnancy. Ceylon Med J. 2009, 54 (1): 21-22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ryan MT, Saldana B: Bilateral tubal ectopic pregnancy: a tale of caution. Acad Emerg Med. 2000, 7 (10): 1160-1163. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb01269.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Foster HM, Lakshin AS, Taylor WF: Bilateral tubal pregnancy with vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1982, 60 (5): 664-666.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mathelier AC: Fertility after bilateral tubal pregnancy – modern treatment considerations. Int J Fertil. 1990, 35 (3): 160-163.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Onuigbo IB, Eze JN, Okafor II: Twin proneness associated with two extraordinary cases of coexistence of bilateral tubal pregnancies. J Coll Med. 2007, 12: 5-7.Google Scholar
- Kirkegaard I, Kruse C: Bilateral tubal pregnancy. Ugeskr Laeger. 2009, 171 (21): 1775-1776.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.