- Case report
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
A free vascularized tibia-fibular composite graft for the traumatic femoral bony defect of a 6-year-old boy with 10-year follow up: a case report
© Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
- Received: 10 December 2012
- Accepted: 3 April 2013
- Published: 28 May 2013
Free vascularized fibular grafts have been widely used for the reconstruction of long bone defects. However, the use of a vascularized tibial graft is precluded by its weight-bearing function and unacceptable donor site morbidity.
We present a rare case of using a vascularized tibia-fibular composite graft taken from a 6-year-old Chinese boy’s ipsilateral lower leg to reconstruct a large bony defect of his traumatic femur. Hypertrophy of the tibial graft, good remodeling of the femoral shaft, and atrophy of the unloaded fibular graft were noted at the 10-year follow up. He was able to participate in outdoor activities such as basketball while wearing his prosthesis.
The 10-year follow up demonstrates the feasibility of this salvage procedure for a floating knee injury with neurovascular compromise.
- Traumatic bony defect
- Vascularized tibia-fibular graft
Since Taylor  reported the first case of vascularized bone graft to reconstruct a large defect in a tibia in 1977, free vascularized fibular grafts have been widely accepted for the reconstruction of long bone defects, especially when the defect is greater than 6cm [1–10]. However, the management of large long-bone defects with autogenous vascularized tibial bone is precluded by its weight-bearing function and unacceptable donor site morbidity. In selected cases, for example when a chronic femoral non-union persists after other reconstructive procedures, the tibia might provide an alternative as long-bone reconstruction donor tissue [2, 11, 12]. We present the case of a 6-year-old child in whom a free vascularized tibia-fibular composite graft taken from the amputated ipsilateral leg was used to reconstruct an acute 9cm bony defect of the femur. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a transfer of a free vascularized tibia-fibular composite graft to reconstruct an acute traumatic defect of the femur with neurovascular compromise in a long-term follow up.
Postoperatively, the patient was treated with intravenous antibiotics using cefazolin 500mg every 8 hours and gentamicin sulfate 20mg every 8 hours. No anticoagulants were used postoperatively in this patient. Subsequent wound cultures grew Escherichia coli and Streptococcus bovis. On the 7th postoperative day, bone scanning using technetium-labeled methylene diphosphonate was performed which demonstrated positive uptake on both ends of the donor tibia-fibular graft. Because the right leg was not stable enough, no specific physical therapy or temporary prosthesis was used. The wound at the medial and posterior aspect of the right thigh became erythematous and purulent discharge was noted 11 days after the initial operation. Debridement of the necrotic muscle and tissue was performed and the wound was then closed loosely. The antibiotics were changed to cefamandole 250mg every 8 hours and ampicillin 500mg every 6 hours, based on the culture data. The stump of the below-knee amputation also became necrotic and was debrided 26 days after the initial surgery. The skin and wound condition were stabilized thereafter.
Severe open fractures are surgical emergencies that should be thought of as incomplete amputations . The only absolute indication for amputation in trauma is an ischemic limb with a non-reconstructible neurovascular injury. In the lower extremity, a severe open fracture (Gustilo–Anderson grade IIIC) combined with an insensate plantar foot surface is generally treated with an immediate amputation. It was for these reasons we initially performed an immediate below-knee amputation for our patient. Instead of performing an above knee amputation, we tried to preserve the knee joint so that this young patient would have better function and activity of his right lower extremity later in life. Our concerns at the time of operation were whether the transferred epiphyseal plate of the distal tibia would affect ultimate femoral length, the fate of the transferred unloaded fibula, the neurovascular condition of the salvaged limb, and knee function. The challenges during surgery and the perioperative period included the reconstruction of limb length, alignment, host-donor junctional union, neurovascular function, and weight-bearing capacity to avoid stress fracture and subsequent infection. Through successful microsurgery, together with bony transfer, neurovascular anastomosis, soft tissue coverage, sequential debridement and effective parenteral antibiotics usage, we were able to salvage the lower extremity and eradicate the skeletal infection with favorable results. However, due to a lack of rigid fixation, delayed callus formation and pins loosening, we changed the Hoffmann external fixation to plate fixation with an autogenous local bone graft at 4 months after surgery. The rigid internal fixation improved the bony incorporation between the donor and host bone junction, maintained correct alignment of the limb, and promoted the union rate at 8 months after the initial injury. The improved blood supply after the vascularized flap also helped overcome the skeletal infection.
Free vascularized fibular grafting has been reported many times in the literature for use in the salvage of massive bony defects, and that hypertrophy of the free vascularized fibular graft can also increase the limb’s weight-bearing capacity [3, 4, 6–10, 14]. However, there have been no published reports regarding the free vascularized distal tibia-fibular graft. The considerations in our decision to use the amputated specimen as the osteomuscular graft include the following: (1) a 9cm femoral bony defect was difficult to reconstruct using other methods; (2) sciatic nerve regeneration might not reach the ankle even after successful repair; and (3) unpredictable limb length discrepancy and soft tissue scarring will influence knee function in the future. Several options for reconstructing a massive bony defect in a floating knee injury with neurovascular compromise might include: (1) vascularized allograft ; (2) vascularized fibula from the amputated specimen or from the contralateral leg [3–5, 7–10]; (3) acute shortening; and (4) Ilizarov’s bone-transfer and lengthening [14–19]. In this specific situation, however, a free vascularized tibia-fibula autogenous bone graft was thought to be the best method to decrease the morbidity, achieve sufficient weight-bearing support, prevent the possibility of rejection or transmissible diseases from an allograft, and preserve the knee function. Because the length of the distal tibia-fibular amputee was relatively shorter than the length of the femoral bony defect, we preserved the distal tibial epiphyseal plate to prevent the graft from becoming too short in the future. A similar procedure, in which a vascularized transplant of the proximal fibula was performed with an open physis to allow the growth potential of the segment, was reported by Ceruso et al. . The transferred epiphyseal plate in our patient was removed at 4 months (during a plate exchange with the original external fixator), because there was no length discrepancy between the bilateral femurs at that time. Some alternative forms of fixation between the femur and the tibial graft, such as transfixing pins into the host-donor bones, might help stabilize the fractured site, keep the alignment, and allow application of the external skeletal fixation until bony union. However, relapsed skeletal infection and an unequal limb length must be avoided.
For a segmental bone gap of 6cm or less, traditional bone grafting techniques may suffice. For a defect greater than 6cm, a fibula is preferable as a free vascularized bone graft [3–5, 8–10] because of its length, longitudinal configuration, limited donor site morbidity, and predictable vascular pedicle for limb reconstruction, although Ilizarov’s lengthening is another option [14–19]. Free vascularized fibular grafting has the following advantages: (1) It accomplishes neurovascular anastomosis and limb length in a one-stage procedure. (2) The graft may be doweled into the position proximally and distally for femoral stability during reconstruction. (3) Bleeding bone with endosteal and periosteal circulation is transferred to the recipient site. (4) Vascularity of the periosteum influences the degree of hypertrophy more in the medullary cavity of the femur than in the onlay graft. (5) If the anastomosis fails, the vascularized bone may function as a traditional cortical bone graft [3–5, 9, 10, 20]. Despite the distinct advantages of a free vascularized fibular graft, this procedure cannot correct limb length discrepancy, which is the main advantage of the Ilizarov’s bone-transfer method [14–18]. Angular deformity, particularly observed in the fracture of the upper or lower third of the femur because of the angular muscle forces, needs preoperative skeletal traction, intraoperative adjustment and rigid fixation of the leg length and alignment. We found similar advantages in our vascularized tibia-fibular composite graft and larger cross-sectional area for mechanical support. Besides, in the situation of a floating knee injury with severe neurovascular compromise, the use of vascularized tibia-fibular osteomuscular grafting is an optimal choice for reconstructing the injured lower limb and improving functional outcomes.
Delayed callus formation was found in our patient, because we initially used Hoffmann’s external fixation for a leg that sustained a high-energy trauma with potential skeletal infection. We were concerned whether the transferred distal tibial epiphyseal plate would influence the ultimate length of the femur, alignment, and host-donor bony union. The second-staged operation using dynamic compression plating supplemented by an iliac bone graft rigidly aligned the host-donor bones and achieved early union. The transferred epiphyseal plate of the distal tibia and fibula were removed at that time because there was no length discrepancy of the injured femur. On the standing scanogram at the 10-year follow up, the limb proved to be on the same axis as the normal leg, and the knee and hip joints were both at the same level (Figures 3A and 3B). Although the patient was only 16 years old, we thought there would be no femoral length discrepancy in the future because both femoral epiphyseal plates were intact and equal in closure to the contralateral normal lower extremity. The patient is satisfied with the result and has an acceptable walking ability.
To the best of our knowledge, the transfer of a tibia-fibular graft containing the zone of injury from high-energy trauma to reconstruct a defect in the ipsilateral femur has not been reported. In our case, the alignment and length of the remodeled femur were maintained due to the successful microsurgery and secondary rigid fixation. The long-term result demonstrates the feasibility of using a microvascular transfer of a vascularized tibia-fibular graft to reconstruct a massive femoral bony defect in a severe floating knee injury with neurovascular compromise.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s legal guardians for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Taylor GI: Microvascular free bone transfer: a clinical technique. Orthop Clin North Am. 1977, 8: 425-447.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fealy MJ, Most D, Struck S, Simms GE, Hui K: Femur lengthening with a vascularized tibia bone flap. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 1996, 37 (2): 140-146. 10.1097/00000637-199608000-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jupiter JB, Bour CJ, May JW: The reconstruction of defects in the femoral shaft with vascularized transfers of fibular bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987, 69: 365-374.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Malizos KN, Zalavras CG, Soucacos PN: Free vascularized fibular grafts for reconstruction of skeletal defects. J AAOS. 2004, 12: 360-369.Google Scholar
- Jobe MT: Microsurgery. Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics. Edited by: Canale ST. Mosby. 1998, 3173-3270.Google Scholar
- Pelissier P, Boireau P, Martin D, Baudet J: Bone reconstruction of the lower extremity: complications and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003, 111 (7): 2223-2229. 10.1097/01.PRS.0000060116.21049.53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sharma S, Tiwari P, Kasabian AK, Longaker MT: Reconstruction of a tibial defect with microvascular transfer of a previously fractured fibula. Ann Plast Surg. 2000, 45 (2): 202-206. 10.1097/00000637-200045020-00020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tomita K, Ikeda K, Tsuchiya H: Vascularized bone graft for limb salvage surgery of malignant bone tumors. New Developments for Limb Salvage Surgery of Malignant Bone Tumors. Edited by: Yamamuro T. 1989, Tokyo: Springer Verlag, 347-351.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wei FC, El-Gammal TA, Lin CH, Ueng WN: Free fibula osteoseptocutaneous graft for reconstruction of segmental femoral shaft defects. J Trauma. 1997, 43: 784-792. 10.1097/00005373-199711000-00009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wood MB: Femoral reconstruction by vascularized bone transfer. Microsurgery. 1990, 11: 74-79. 10.1002/micr.1920110114.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ceruso M, Falcone C, Innocenti M, Delcroix L, Capanna R, Manfrini M: Skeletal reconstruction with a free vascularized fibula graft associated to bone allograft after resection of malignant bone tumor of limbs. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1999, 33: 277-282.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McDonald DJ, Scott SM, Eckardt JJ: Tibial turn-up for long distal femoral bone loss. Clin Orthop. 2001, 383: 214-220.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christian CA: General principles of fracture treatment. Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics. Edited by: Canale ST. Mosby. 1998, 1993-2041.Google Scholar
- Yokoyama K, Itoman M, Nakamura K: Free vascularized fibular graft versus Ilizarov method for post-traumatic tibial bone defect. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2001, 17: 17-25. 10.1055/s-2001-12684.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- DeCoster TA, Simpson AH, Wood M: Biologic model of bone transport distraction osteogenesis and vascular response. J Orthop Res. 1999, 17: 238-245. 10.1002/jor.1100170213.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maini L, Chadha M, Vishwanath J: The Ilizarov method in infected nonunion of fractures. Injury. 2000, 31: 509-517. 10.1016/S0020-1383(00)00036-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smrke D, Arnez ZM: Treatment of extensive bone and soft tissue defects of the lower limb by traction and free-flap transfer. Injury. 2000, 31: 153-162. 10.1016/S0020-1383(99)00253-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Song HR, Kale A, Park HB: Comparison of internal bone transport and vascularized fibular grafting for femoral bone defects. J Orthop Trauma. 2003, 17: 203-211. 10.1097/00005131-200303000-00009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsuchiya H, Tomita K, Minematsu K: Limb salvage using distraction osteogenesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997, 79: 403-411. 10.1302/0301-620X.79B3.7198.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yajima H, Tamai S: Twin barrelled vascularized fibular grafting to the pelvis and lower extremity. Clin Orthop. 1994, 303: 178-184.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.