Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Primary glioblastoma of the cerebellum in a 19-year-old woman: a case report

  • Moulay Rachid El El Maaqili1,
  • Adil Hossini1Email author,
  • Nizar El Fatemi1,
  • Rachid Gana1,
  • Amar Saïdi2,
  • Mohammed Jiddane3 and
  • Fouad Bellakhdar1
Journal of Medical Case Reports20126:329

https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-6-329

Received: 17 September 2011

Accepted: 16 August 2012

Published: 2 October 2012

Abstract

Introduction

Cerebellar glioblastoma is an uncommon adult lesion. The pathogeny and prognosis of cerebellar glioblastoma are still incompletely elucidated.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 19-year-old Moroccan woman. A neurologic examination revealed the presence of cerebellar signs. A diagnosis of cerebellar glioblastoma is rarely made before surgery. An encephalic computer tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging increased the accuracy of defining the nature of the lesion. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a heterogeneously enhancing mass in the vermis and the right cerebellar hemisphere. After surgery, glioblastoma was histologically confirmed. Post-operative radiotherapy followed. The outcome of our patient was favorable after one year of follow-up.

Conclusions

We report an unusual case of cerebellar gliobastoma. Cerebellar glioblastoma multiforme should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a cerebellar mass lesion.

Keywords

GlioblastomaPosterior fossaMagnetic resonance imagingSurgery

Introduction

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor in adults. It usually affects the cerebral hemispheres, and the peak age of onset is the sixth or seventh decade of life[1]. Cerebellar glioblastoma is a rare adult tumor. To the best of our knowledge, only a few cases have been reported[2, 3]. The tumor represents 0% to 3.4% of primary GBMs[4, 5]. In this case report, we present a case of primary cerebellar glioblastoma and discuss the physiopathology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and general outcomes of this disease.

Case presentation

A 19-year-old Moroccan woman without any other medical history was admitted to our hospital with a two-month history of intracranial pressure with nausea, vomiting, and headache. A neurologic examination showed cerebellar signs, including cerebellar ataxia, dysmetria, and dysdiadochokinesia. The fundus oculi showed bilateral papillary edema. A cerebral computed tomography (CT) scan showed two lesions: one in the right cerebellar hemisphere and the other in the vermis. The lesions were spontaneously hypodense with a peripheral heterogeneous enhancement after contrast injection and mass effect on the fourth ventricle (Figures 1 and2). Cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed irregular contours of mass lesions. The processes were heterogeneous on T1- and T2-weighted images and this can be related to a subacute intratumoral hemorrhage with discrete surrounding edema. After gadolinium was administered, the lesion was 3×4cm in size and had heterogeneous ring enhancement and a central necrotic area (Figures 3,4, and5).
Figure 1

Cerebral computed tomography scan of two lesions in the right cerebellar hemisphere and the vermis (arrow). The lesions are spontaneously hypodense.

Figure 2

Vermis and right cerebellar lesions (arrow) with a peripheral heterogeneous enhancement after contrast injection and mass effect on the fourth ventricle.

Figure 3

Cranial magnetic resonance imaging of irregular contours of the mass lesions that are in contact with the fourth ventricle and the confluence of sinus (arrow). The processes are heterogeneous on T1-weighted imaging.

Figure 4

The processes are heterogeneous on a T2-weighted image (arrow) with discrete surrounding edema. The cerebellar lesion measures 3×4cm in size.

Figure 5

The lesions have a heterogeneous contrast ring enhancement with intratumoral necrotic central zones (arrow).

Our patient first had a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. On the second day, a suboccipital craniotomy was performed while our patient was in the prone position. After opening of the dura mater and corticectomy, the lesion was white, infiltrative, crumbly, and not very hemorrhagic, had no planes of cleavage, and had indistinct margins from adjacent normal white matter. A subtotal tumor resection was performed. A histopathological examination revealed a cellular tumor, which was consistent with glioblastoma (that met the World Health Organization criteria of grade 4 astrocytoma) and which was composed of elongated spindle-shaped cells with irregular, moderately pleomorphic and giant nuclei, and proliferative blood vessels and necrosis (hematoxylin and eosin stain (HES) ×100 and HES ×400). Immunohistochemistry was accomplished by means of the 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (AEC) peroxydase method and antigenic restoration, showing a marking of tumor cells with anti-GFAP (anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein) antibodies (Figures 6 and7).
Figure 6

Original coloration shows an intense cellular density. The cells are characterized by a marked anisokaryosis. The nuclei are quite large. The cells have an abundant and eosinophilic cytoplasm (arrow). Numerous mitoses are observed. Stain: hematoxylin and eosin; magnification: ×400.

Figure 7

Immunohistochemistry study by 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole peroxidase method and antigenic restoration in warmth show a labeling of the cells with the anti-GFAP (anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein) antibodies. The positivity of the GFAP confirmed the astrocytic nature of the lesion (arrow). An immunohistochemistry profile of glioblastoma is shown.

The post-operative course was uneventful, and the neurologic signs gradually improved. Our patient received post-operative radiotherapy to the posterior cranial fossa. There was no tumor recurrence after 12 months.

Discussion

Glioblastoma, the most frequent tumor among all primary tumors of the central nervous system in adults, has a frequency of 50%[2, 3, 5]. Adult cerebellar glioblastoma is extremely rare, accounting for 0.24% to 3.8% of all intracranial glioblastomas[24, 6, 7]. From 1975 to 2011, 170 articles and abstracts about cerebellum glioblastoma were published, according to a search of the Medline database. The male-to-female ratio is 2:1[8]. Cerebellar glioblastoma can be seen in all age groups. About 70% of lesions were seen in adults, and median age was 46.7 years; 30% were noted in children, and median age was 10.4 years[4, 8]. As with our patient, localization is generally median or paramedian with a possible extension to the fourth ventricle[4]. The tumor is infiltrative and usually is localized in the deep white matter[6].

The pathogeny and prognosis of cerebellar glioblastomas are still incompletely elucidated because of their rarity[6]. Most authors have failed to fully explain the rarity of cerebellar GBM[1, 4]. Based on the clinical and genetic data, there are two subsets of GBM[9]. Glioblastoma may develop de novo (primary type) or from previous low-grade astrocytomas (secondary type)[10]. Secondary glioblastomas develop more frequently in younger patients and often contain TP 53 mutation (65%), whereas primary glioblastomas affect mostly elderly patients and generally are characterized by the loss of heterozygosity 10 q (LOH 10q) (70%), epidermal growth factor receptor amplification (36%), and TP 53 mutation at a frequency of lower than 30%[10]. Radiotherapy was also incriminating for the possibility of anaplasic progression of mature cerebellar astrocytic cells[6, 11]. Maat-Schieman et al.[11] reported a case of vermis cerebellar astrocytoma that developed after radiotherapy for craniopharyngioma. Other authors reported the development of glioblastoma after radiotherapy for pilocytic astrocytoma, medulloblastoma, and other posterior fossa tumors[12]. Our patient had no history of radiotherapy.

Symptomatology of cerebellar glioblastoma, like that of any other cerebellar tumor, generally includes headache, gait disturbance, vertigo, nausea, vomiting, and ataxia (as in our case). Indeed, dizziness, neck pain, and mental confusion can be present[2, 4, 7]. These symptoms are nonspecific and can occur in many diseases.

The diagnosis of cerebellar glioblastoma is rarely made before surgery, even though CT scan and especially MRI have increased the accuracy of defining the nature of the lesion[2, 3, 6]. MRI shows decreased T1- and increased T2-weighted signal intensities compared with white matter. In the majority of cases, a peripheral heterogeneous enhancement after contrast injection, irregular contours, and a central necrosis similar to that of supratentorial glioblastoma are noted. Intratumoral hemorrhage is suggested by mixed signals on T1- and T2-weighted signals[2, 3, 6]. MRI diffusion/perfusion and MRI spectroscopy examinations can also facilitate the characterization of the lesions and the differential diagnosis[2].

Proton spectroscopy of high-grade gliomas shows a significant reduction in NAA (N-acetyl aspartate), owing to the loss in neuronal elements, and a choline peak elevation that may reflect increased membrane synthesis. The presence of a lactate peak correlates with tumor hypoxia[2, 3, 6, 13]. Hydrocephalus was reported in our patient and also in other cases. It was found in four out of nine patients of Kuroiwa et al.[4].

Cerebellar metastases are the most frequent posterior cerebral fossa tumors for adults and represent the most common differential diagnosis, particularly if the lesion is solitary and there is no history of primary lesion[2, 4, 6]. However, the margins of metastases are distinct with a most important surrounding edema. Metastasis may demonstrate cystic components or show hypointensity on T2-weighted images, suggesting intratumoral hemorrhage, calcification, or mucinous components, while GBM grows infiltratively with peripheral heterogeneous enhancement and poorly defined margins[4]. Peritumoral edema is rather mild compared with that of metastatic tumors[1, 7]. Intratumoral hemorrhage is common, but calcification or cystic components are rarely seen.

Diagnostic difficulty also arises when there are several lesions, as with our patient. Other causes like abscesses, granulomas, or metastases should be considered, also primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the posterior fossa, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, pilocytic astrocytoma, or hemangioblastoma[1, 2, 4]. As the posterior fossa is a small compartment, it is very difficult to be absolutely certain that these two lesions were completely distinct. They were probably two focal areas of tumor connected with each other. As it was not possible to resect both lesions, there was no evidence to prove the true multifocal nature of this tumor.

The treatment of cerebellar glioblastoma is usually palliative and encompasses surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy[1]. The decision regarding surgery for glioblastoma depends on the patient’s age, performance status, proximity to “eloquent” areas of brain, feasibility of decreasing the mass effect, resectability of the tumor, and, in a patient with recurrent disease, the time since previous surgery. Surgical treatment includes stereotactic or open biopsy and debulking with subtotal or gross resection. Surgery will achieve a diagnosis, decrease intracranial pressure, increase survival, and reduce the need for corticosteroid therapy[1, 3, 4].

After surgery, the patient can be treated with fractionated external beam radiotherapy[3, 7]. Total doses of 54 to 60Gy in 1.8 to 2.0Gy fractions are administered to the gross tumor volume[1]. Craniospinal irradiation can be recommended for children because of the high incidence of cerebrospinal fluid dissemination of cerebellar GBM[7]. The chemotherapy of choice is temozolomide, although bis-chloronitrosourea, lomustine, or PCV (procarbazine, lomustine, vincristine) can also be used[14]. Patients with a good performance score should be treated with daily temozolomide (75mg/m2) administered with post-operative radiation therapy followed by one year of a dose of 150 to 200mg/m2 per day for five days each month[15].

The biological behaviors of cerebellar and supratentorial GBM are similar. On the other hand, the prognosis of cerebellar glioblastoma for younger patients is similar to that of anaplasic astrocytoma and probably has a better outcome than cerebral glioblastoma[3]. The mean survival of cerebellar glioblastoma after the beginning of the symptomatology has been reported to be approximately 12 to 19 months[3, 7, 8].

Conclusions

Cerebellar GBM is rare and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a cerebellar mass lesion. MRI can facilitate the characterization of the lesions and the differential diagnosis, particularly from metastases. Aggressive surgical treatment along with radiation therapy remains the established management strategy.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Abbreviations

CT: 

Computed tomography

GBM: 

Glioblastoma multiforme

HES: 

Hematoxylin and eosin stain

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neurosurgery, Avicenne University Hospital
(2)
Department of Anatomopathology, Avicenne University Hospital
(3)
Department of Neuroradiology, Avicenne University Hospital

References

  1. Grahovac G, Tomac D, Lambasa S: Cerebellar glioblastomas: pathophysiology, clinical presentation and management. Acta Neurochir. 2009, 151: 653-657. 10.1007/s00701-009-0286-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Demir MK, Hakan T, Akinci O, Berkman Z: Primary cerebellar glioblastoma multiforme. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2005, 11: 83-86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Mattos JP, Marenco HA, Campos JM, Faria AV, Queiroz LS, Borges G, de Oliveira E: Cerebellar glioblastoma multiforme in adult. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2006, 64: 132-135. 10.1590/S0004-282X2006000100028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kuroiwa T, Numaguchi Y, Rothman MI, Zoarski GH, Morikawa M, Zagardo MT, Kristt DA: Posterior fossa glioblastoma multiforme: MR findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995, 16: 583-589.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Stark AM, Nabavi A, Mehdorn HM, Blomer U: Glioblastoma multiforme-report of 267 cases treated at a single institution. Surg Neurol. 2005, 63: 162-169. 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.01.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hur H, Jung S, Jung TY, Kim IY: Cerebellar glioblastoma multiforme in an adult. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2008, 43: 194-197. 10.3340/jkns.2008.43.4.194.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Kulkarni AV, Becker LE, Jay V, Armstrong DC, Drake JM: Primary cerebellar glioblastomas multiforme in children. Report of four cases. J Neurosurg. 1999, 90: 546-550. 10.3171/jns.1999.90.3.0546.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dohmann GJ, Dunsmore RH: Glioblastoma multiforme of the cerebellum. Surg Neurol. 1975, 3: 219-223.Google Scholar
  9. Benjamin R, Capparella J, Brown A: Classification of glioblastoma multiforme in adults by molecular genetics. Cancer J. 2003, 9: 82-90. 10.1097/00130404-200303000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ohgaki H, Kleihues P: Genetic pathways to primary and secondary glioblastoma. Am J Pathol. 2007, 170: 1445-1453. 10.2353/ajpath.2007.070011.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Maat-Schieman ML, Bots GT, Thomeer RT, Vielvoye GJ: Malignant astrocytoma following radiotherapy for craniopharyngioma. Br J Radiol. 1985, 58: 480-482. 10.1259/0007-1285-58-689-480.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Schmidbauer M, Budka H, Bruckner R, Vorkapic P: Glioblastoma developing at the site of a cerebellar medulloblastoma treated 6 years earlier. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1987, 67: 915-918. 10.3171/jns.1987.67.6.0915.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Law M, Cha S, Knopp EA, Johnson G, Arnett J, Litt AW: High-grade gliomas and solitary metastases: differentiation by using perfusion and proton spectroscopic MR imaging. Radiology. 2002, 222: 715-721. 10.1148/radiol.2223010558.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Yung WK, Prados MD, Yaya-Tur R, Rosenfeld SS, Brada M, Friedman HS, Albright R, Olson J, Chang SM, O’Neill AM, Friedman AH, Bruner J, Yue N, Dugan M, Zaknoen S, Levin VA: Multicenter phase II trial of Temozolomide in patients with Anaplastic astrocytoma or anaplastic oligoastrocytoma at first relapse. Temodal Brain Tumour Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999, 17: 2762-2771.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Stupp R, Mason WP, Van Den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, Curschmann J, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Gorlia T, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Eisenhauer E, Mirimanoff RO, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor and Radiotherapy Groups, National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group: Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant Temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352: 987-996. 10.1056/NEJMoa043330.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© El Maaqili et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.