Cleidocranial dysplasia presenting with retained deciduous teeth in a 15-year-old girl: a case report
© C et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 6 September 2010
Accepted: 19 January 2012
Published: 19 January 2012
Cleidocranial dysplasia is a rare congenital defect of autosomal dominant inheritance caused by mutations in the Cbfa1 gene, also called Runx2, located on the short arm of chromosome 6. It primarily affects bones which undergo intramembranous ossification. This condition is of clinical significance to dentistry due to the involvement of the facial bones, altered eruption patterns and multiple supernumerary teeth.
Our patient, a 15-year-old Indian girl, presented with the typical features of prolonged retention of deciduous dentition and delayed eruption of permanent teeth, that is, mandibular prognathism along with other skeletal abnormalities like shrugged shoulder and the absence of clavicles. A multidisciplinary approach was followed, comprising orthodontic, surgical and pedodontic teams for management.
Successful treatment of such a case lies in a holistic approach that takes care of all aspects, including the primary pathology, the deformity itself and even the psychological angle.
Cleidocranial dysplasia is a rare congenital defect of autosomal dominance inheritance [1–3] that primarily affects bones which undergo intramembranous ossification. It was first described by Marie and Sainton in 1898 . Cleidocranial dysplasia, also known as Marie and Sainton disease  or cleidocranial dysostosis , is associated with a spontaneous mutation in the gene encoding for transcription factor core binding factor alpha 1 (Cbfa1), which is essential for osteoblast and odontoblast differentiation as well as for bone and tooth formation . The gene has been mapped to chromosome 6p21 .
The pathology relating to this condition is due to an early developmental disorder of mesenchyme or connective tissue. This causes retarded ossification of bone precursors, especially at junctions, which can lead to defective ossification, or even failure of ossification, of portions of the skeletal structure.
Cleidocranial dysplasia presents with skeletal defects, partial or complete absence of the clavicles, late closure of fontanelles, presence of open skull sutures and multiple wormian bones [2, 8]. The maxilla is also underdeveloped along with ill-formed paranasal sinuses. This condition is of clinical significance to dentistry due to the involvement of the facial bones, altered eruption patterns and multiple supernumerary teeth. It manifests itself as a condition in which teeth fail to erupt, which is thought to be due to the absence of cellular cementum and an increase in the amount of acellular cementum of the roots of the affected teeth .
Under an aggressive oral hygiene maintenance program, our patient is followed-up periodically for further treatment.
Cleidocranial dysplasia is a well defined clinical phenotype arising from deregulation of intramembranous and endochondral ossification due to a mutation in Cbfa1. Hypermobility of the shoulders, abnormal clavicles, wormian bones and supernumerary teeth are seen to be consistent features of cleidocranial dysplasia. In our case, the pathognomonic features, like the absence of clavicles, broad skull sutures and numerous impacted and supernumerary teeth, were present [2, 5].
It has been suggested that 70% of patients with cleidocranial dysplasia have a point mutation involving Runx2 and 13% have a deletion. In patients whose mutations are not found by traditional sequencing, the deletion/duplication assay, either Reverse transcription - quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) or Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), needs to be done [10–12]. Though it has been reported that individuals with central core disease could have cytogenetically visible complex chromosome rearrangements , in the present case the chromosomal analysis and gene mapping were normal. In order to identify the mutations in the Runx2, molecular genetic analysis is recommended.
Dental findings in cleidocranial dysplasia are characterized by a decreased eruptive force of both primary and permanent dentition, prolonged retention of primary teeth  and an increase in odontogenesis leading to an excessive number of supernumerary teeth . It has been proposed that the supernumerary teeth should be diagnosed and removed as early as possible because they will impede the normal eruption of permanent teeth . This suggestion was followed in our case. Further, an anomaly in the eruption of the anterior teeth may interfere with facial aesthetics and lead to other clinical problems.
The treatment objective in our case was to consider both the physical and psychological aspects of our patient. Redistribution of the space in her oral cavity and guidance of the permanent teeth to erupt in a proper alignment were planned. These were achieved by extracting the retained teeth and surgical exposure followed by orthodontic traction for the eruption of the permanent teeth . Simultaneously, the psychological well-being of our patient was taken care of through behavior management methods and counseling, ultimately resulting in an improvement in her self-image and confidence.
Stabilization of the periodontal health of her permanent teeth and necessary orthodontic treatment will be continued in further follow-up appointments .
Cleidocranial dysplasia patients with compromised aesthetics are usually seen as an unexpected event in the course of observing or treating a patient. Early diagnosis allows proper orientation to the treatment and offers a better life quality. A holistic approach takes care of all the aspects, including the primary pathology and the psychological aspects.
Written informed consent was obtained from our patient's parents for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Tanaka JL, Ono E, Filho EM, Castilho JC, Moraes LC, Moraes ME: Cleidocranial dysplasia: importance of radiographic images in diagnosis of the condition. J Oral Sci. 2006, 48 (3): 161-166. 10.2334/josnusd.48.161.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brueton LA, Reeve A, Ellis R, Husband P, Thomson EM, Kingston HM: Apparent cleidocranial dysplasia associated with abnormalities of 8q22 in three individuals. Am J Med Genet. 1992, 43 (3): 612-618. 10.1002/ajmg.1320430322.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dard M: Histology of alveolar bone and primary tooth roots in a case of cleidocranial dysplasia. Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol. 1993, 36 (3-4): 101-107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marie P, Sainton P: Sur la dysostose cleido-cranienne hereditaire. Rev Neurol. 1898, 6: 835-838.Google Scholar
- Kalliala E, Taskinen PJ: Cleidocranial dysostosis: report of six typical cases and one atypical case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1962, 14: 808-822.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen S, Santos L, Wu Y, Vuous R, Gay I, Schulze J, Chuang HH, MacDougall M: Altered gene expression in human cleidocranial dysplasia dental pulp cells. Arch Oral Biol. 2005, 50: 227-236. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2004.10.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mundlos S: Cleidocranial dysplasia: clinical and molecular genetics. J Med Genet. 1999, 36 (3): 177-182.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- De Nguyen T, Turcotte JY: Cleidocranial dysplasia: review of literature and presentation of a case. J Can Dent Assoc. 1994, 60 (12): 1073-1078.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Counts AL, Rohrer MD, Prasad H, Bolen P: An assessment of root cementum in cleidocranial dysplasia. Angle Orthodont. 2001, 71: 293-298.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mendoza-Londono R, Lee B: Cleidocranial dysplasia. GeneReviews. 2006, 1-18.Google Scholar
- Markovic MD: At the crossroads of facial genetics. Eur J Orthodont. 1992, 14: 469-481.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee MT, Tsai AC, Chou CH, Sun FM, Huang LC, Yen P, Lin CC, Liu CY, Wu JY, Chen YT, Tsai FJ: Intragenic microdeletion of RUNX2 is a novel mechanism for cleidocranial dysplasia. Genomic Med. 2008, 2 (1-2): 45-49. 10.1007/s11568-008-9024-y.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Purandare SM, Mendoza-Londono R, Yatsenko SA, Napierala D, Scott DA, Sibai T, Casas K, Wilson P, Lee J, Muneer R, Leonard JC, Ramji FG, Lachman R, Li S, Stankiewicz P, Lee B, Mulvihill JJ: De novo three-way chromosome translocation 46, XY, t(4;621)(p16;p21.1;q21) in a male with cleidocranial dysplasia. Am J Med Genet A. 2008, 146A (4): 453-458. 10.1002/ajmg.a.31750.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Quinn PD, Lewis J, Levin LM: Surgical management of a patient with cleidocranial dysplasia: a case report. Special Care Dent. 1992, 12 (3): 131-133. 10.1111/j.1754-4505.1992.tb00429.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Golan I, Baumert U, Hrala BP, Mossig D: Early craniofacial signs of cleidocranial dysplasia. Int J Pediatr Dent. 2004, 14: 49-53. 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2004.00501.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tanaka E, Watanabe M, Nagaoka K, Yamaguchi K, Tanne K: Orthodontic traction of an impacted maxillary central incisor. J Clin Orthod. 2001, 35: 375-378.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bayram M, Ozer M, Senar I: Bilaterally impacted maxillary central incisors: surgical exposure and orthodontic treatment: a case report. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2002, 7: 98-105.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.