This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A novel diagnostic sign of hip fracture mechanism in ground level falls: two case reports and review of the literature
© Kelly and Kelly; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 29 August 2011
Accepted: 2 February 2012
Published: 29 May 2012
Most elderly hip fractures are the result of a ground level fall. Defining high risk falls and fracture mechanisms are important to develop successful hip fracture prevention programs. This case series presents a previously unreported diagnostic sign and for the first time documents a hip fracture mechanism for a knee impact injury from a ground level fall in two elderly patients.
Case 1 was a 65-year-old Caucasian woman who fell forward with initial contact to her left knee, sustaining an impacted femoral neck fracture of her ipsilateral left hip. Case 2 was a 92-year-old Caucasian woman who fell bending forward, impacting her left knee and sustaining a comminuted intertrochanteric fracture of her ipsilateral left hip. The fractures occurred as a result of unprotected ground level falls in a forward direction with initial impact to the knee. The knee contusions were located near Gerdy’s tubercle and appear characteristic of a direct impact injury.
The physical finding of a small localized site of impact and/or contusion in the anterior aspect of the knee in both of these patients with radiographic evidence of an ipsilateral hip fracture would strongly suggest that a knee impact injury can transmit enough energy to the proximal femur by axial loading to result in the hip fracture. The physical finding described is a reliable indicator of this hip fracture mechanism.
A simple ground level fall can have serious consequences. More than 90% of hip fractures in the elderly population are the result of a ground level fall [1–4]. Current hip fracture prevention strategies in this age group are based mostly on the prevention of osteoporosis, decreasing the number and severity of falls, and protection of the proximal femur when a fall occurs . Understanding the relationships between fall characteristics and hip fracture mechanisms is critical to developing successful prevention programs.
Investigators studying hip fracture mechanisms have concluded that the most common mechanism of hip fracture in the elderly is a sideways fall with lateral hip impact [6–11]. To date there has been no reliable physical finding or radiographic feature on which to base these conclusions or to define fracture mechanisms objectively.
The cases of two patients presenting with a distinct and previously unreported physical finding indicating a hip fracture mechanism are described. An in-depth review of the literature would suggest that this is not only a characteristic finding, but one of clinical importance.
The knee contusions on both patients healed without any further treatment and neither had any knee symptoms at follow-up three months later.
Despite frequent falls in the elderly, only about 1% result in hip fracture [3, 4]. A hip fracture occurs when the energy absorbed around the proximal femur exceeds a critical threshold . Certain fall characteristics are associated with increased risk of hip fracture. Combinations of biomechanical and clinical fracture studies, fall simulation and clinical fall studies provide important information about these high risk falls and the mechanisms of how fractures occur.
There is general agreement that most elderly hip fractures are the result of a sideways fall and impact occurring near or around the hip [6–10]. No investigator in these studies reported any objective finding to conclude a hip fracture mechanism. They determined the hip area to be the site of impact from the patients’ reported histories, and/or the reports of independent witnesses to the fall. The weaknesses of these studies include the potential for preconceived bias of fall direction and impact location coming from patients dealing with a painful hip condition and the inability of some elderly patients to describe the circumstances of the fall when dealing with a life-threatening, traumatic event .
One study did perform physical examinations that included the recording of bruises and hematomas . The association of physical findings with fall mechanics was carefully studied. This study documented the finding of a fresh subcutaneous hematoma in the trochanteric region of the hip in some patients and analyzed lucid patient and independent eyewitness responses. They were able to conclude that the typical hip fracture is the result of a fall and a subsequent impact on the greater trochanter of the proximal femur. The majority (76%) of their patients with hip fractures reported that they had fallen directly to the side. In 56% of these patients, a fresh subcutaneous hematoma was present. Such a hematoma was present in 6% of controls (patients who fell without sustaining a hip fracture).
The physical finding of a subcutaneous hip hematoma is an important objective finding to help document the direction of the fall and the impact area. However, the clinical significance of this physical finding can vary greatly and its documentation has occurred only in this one study . Hematomas in the area of the hip can occur without direct impact in association with extracapsular hip fractures resulting from rotational or indirect trauma. Some patients with a hip fracture and direct impact will show no signs of hematoma; while others will present with a hip hematoma, show no evidence of a hip fracture and have no history of impact .
The present series documents two cases of ground level falls in which both patients describe falling directly forward in an unprotected manner, with initial and isolated direct anterior knee impact. Both patients presented with nearly identical, circular and localized anterior knee contusions near Gerdy’s tubercle. Neither patient had any physical finding indicating other impact sites. This is the first description in the literature of a physical finding of this nature and location found in association with an ipsilateral hip fracture in the elderly.
Investigators of ground level falls and hip fracture mechanisms have concluded that direction of fall is a key determinant of a safe landing. Fall direction influences impact sites as well as a series of responses. A sideways fall is associated with a higher risk of hip fracture than a fall in any other direction. It exposes the hip to unusual direct impact landing forces and decreases the chances of knee and hand protective responses to absorb energy. Conversely, falling forward, hitting the hand(s) and/or the knee(s), seems to ensure a safer landing [6–10]. Despite this evidence, a ground level fall in a forward direction accounts for nearly 8% to 10% of all hip fractures . The mechanism of hip fracture in these cases has never been documented.
The only mechanism of injury to reasonably account for the hip fractures found in our two patients is an axial loading of the ipsilateral femur through direct knee impact. This occurred as a result of low energy unprotected forward falls. Significant hip injuries, including fractures and dislocations, have been well documented in high energy trauma from direct anterior knee impact axial loading of the femur .
The so-called dashboard knee injury has been studied, usually under the circumstances of motor vehicle accidents and, generally, in a younger population. The fracture tolerance of the hip relative to that of the knee and thigh for knee impact conditions has been particularly investigated. Results show that the hip is the weakest part of the knee-thigh-hip complex when the knee strikes the knee bolster during a frontal vehicle impact, and that hip flexion and adduction from the neutral driving posture significantly reduce hip fracture tolerance . Hip injuries result from the dissipation of a large amount of energy about the hip joint. Clinically, these forces are first transmitted through the knee en route to the hip. There is evidence of substantial forces being directly applied to the knee  in these high energy situations.
A recent study by Yamamoto et al. clarifies some of the various mechanisms of hip fracture in the elderly and investigates methods of fracture prevention. They developed a fall simulation system and have studied various unprotected falls (slip, trip and faint) that result in direct anterior knee contact. Their results show that a knee grounding fall caused a higher risk of hip fracture than the risk by a lateral impact on the greater trochanter. These findings support the mechanical relationship between the physical finding of knee impact and hip fracture found in the present review and indicate an axial loading mechanism.
The physical finding of a small localized site of impact and/or contusion in an anterior knee location in both patients with radiologic evidence of an ipsilateral hip fracture would strongly suggest that a knee impact injury can transmit enough energy to the proximal femur by axial loading to result in the hip fracture. This physical finding (Knee Impact Sign), described herein, is a reliable indicator of this hip fracture mechanism. This sign should be looked for in the evaluation of patients, particularly the elderly, in whom hip trauma or fracture is suspected.
The conclusions reached in this case series in no way conflict with the current hip fracture literature, but add to our understanding of these fractures. We remain in agreement that most hip fractures are the result of a sideways fall with impact occurring at or near the hip. There is an opportunity for further study and future biomechanical investigations to define better the nature and true frequency of the association of this physical sign and hip fractures.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this case series and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Grisso JA, Kelsey JL, Strom BL, Ghiu GY, Maislin G, O’Brien LA, Hoffman S, Kaplan F: Risk factors for falls as a cause of hip fracture in women. N Engl J Med. 1991, 324: 1326-1331. 10.1056/NEJM199105093241905.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hedlund D, Lindgren U: Trauma type, age and gender as determinants of hip fracture. J Orthop Res. 1987, 5: 242-246. 10.1002/jor.1100050210.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tinetti ME, Speechley M, Ginter SF: Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. N Engl J Med. 1988, 319: 1701-1707. 10.1056/NEJM198812293192604.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nevitt MC, Cummings SR, Kidd S, Black D: Risk factors for recurrent nonsyncopal falls: a prospective study. JAMA. 1989, 261: 2663-2668. 10.1001/jama.1989.03420180087036.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kannus P, Parkkari J, Sievanen H, Heinonen A, Vuori I, Järvinen M: Epidemiology of hip fractures. Bone. 1996, 18: 57s-63s. 10.1016/8756-3282(95)00381-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cummings SR, Nevitt MC: A hypothesis: the causes of hip fractures. J Gerontol. 1989, 44: M107-M111.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Greenspan SL, Myers ER, Maitland LA, Resnick NM, Hayes WC: Fall severity and bone mineral density as risk factors for hip fracture in ambulatory elderly. JAMA. 1994, 271: 128-133. 10.1001/jama.1994.03510260060029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wei TS, Hu CH, Wang SH, Hwang KL: Fall characteristics, functional mobility, and bone mineral density as risk factors of hip fracture in the community-dwelling ambulatory elderly. Osteoporos Int. 2001, 12: 1050-1055. 10.1007/PL00004184.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hayes WC, Myers ER, Morris JN, Gerhart TN, Yett HS, Lipsitz LA: Impact near the hip dominates fracture risk in elderly nursing home residents who fall. Calcif Tissue Int. 1993, 52: 192-198. 10.1007/BF00298717.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz AV, Kelsey JL, Sidney S, Grisso JA: Characteristics of falls and risk of hip fracture in elderly men. Osteoporos Int. 1998, 8: 240-246. 10.1007/s001980050060.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Parkkari J, Kannus P, Palvanen M, Natri A, Vainio J, Aho H, Vuori I, Järvinen M: Majority of hip fractures occur as a result of a fall and impact on the greater trochanter of the femur: a prospective controlled hip fracture study with 206 consecutive patients. Calcif Tissue Int. 1999, 65: 181-187.Google Scholar
- Schmidt GL, Sciull R, Altman GT: Knee injury in patients experiencing a high-energy traumatic ipsilateral hip dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005, 87: 1200-1204. 10.2106/JBJS.D.02306.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rupp JD, Schneider LW: Injuries to the hip joint in frontal motor-vehicle crashes: biomechanical and real-world perspectives. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004, 35: 493-504.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamamoto S, Tanaka E, Kubouchi Y, Ikeda T, Mizuno K, Harada A, Okuizumi H: Biomechanical evaluations of hip fracture mechanism in pedestrian fall accident. Trans Japan Soc Mech Engrs. 2006, 72: 1799-1807. 10.1299/kikaia.72.1799.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.