Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Primary adenocarcinoma in the ileostomy of a woman with familial adenomatous polyposis: a case report and literature review

  • Ahmed Hammad1Email author,
  • Raed Tayyem2,
  • Peter J Milewski1 and
  • Shanmugavelu Gunasekaran1
Journal of Medical Case Reports20115:556

https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-5-556

Received: 16 June 2011

Accepted: 30 November 2011

Published: 30 November 2011

Abstract

Introduction

Ileal adenomas associated with familial adenomatous polyposis are a common finding. Many recent studies following panproctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis have confirmed the presence of multiple ileal adenomas and an increase in ileal mucosal proliferation. In this study, we present a case of invasive adenocarcinoma arising in a severely dysplastic tubulovillous adenoma in the ileostomy of a patient with familial adenomatous polyposis; also, we present a literature review. To the best of our knowledge, only very few cases have been reported in the literature.

Case presentation

A 59-year-old Caucasian woman developed a primary adenocarcinoma in her ileostomy, complicating the stoma 31 years after its formation.

Conclusions

Primary adenocarcinoma following panproctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis is a very rare clinical entity. The risk of developing adenocarcinoma in those patients increases with time. Patient education and medical examination of the stoma are of paramount importance and should be implemented early with the need of designing a surveillance protocol for early detection and management of ileal adenomas, especially in longstanding stomas.

Introduction

Ileal adenomas associated with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) are a common finding. Many recent studies following panproctocolectomy for FAP have confirmed the presence of multiple ileal adenomas and an increase in ileal mucosal proliferation. The management protocol for FAP is prophylactic colectomy with either restorative proctocolectomy with formation of ileal pouch reservoir or ileorectostomy. Panproctocolectomy and terminal ileostomy were the first-line management option in 1950s. Currently, this procedure is performed only for cases with recurrent rectal or ileal pouch adenocarcinoma. In this study, we present a case of adenocarcinoma in the ileostomy of a patient with FAP; in this case, invasive adenocarcinoma arising in a severely dysplastic tubulovillous adenoma was found. Also, we present a literature review. To the best of our knowledge, only 11 cases in English and one in German [1] have been reported so far.

Case presentation

A 59-year-old Caucasian woman with a previously diagnosed FAP had total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis 34 years ago followed three years later by resection of the rectal stump and fashioning of an end ileostomy in her left iliac fossa; neither the operative details nor the pathology reports were available. Her medical history shows that she has multiple medical comorbidities, including severe sero-negative rheumatoid arthritis, lumbar disc herniation, total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy., osteoarthritis in both hips, eczema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal calculi, and chronic renal disease stage 3.

Three years ago, she was referred to the colorectal clinic because of abnormal fungating growth at the stoma (Figure 1). She was listed for biopsy and diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Pathology from the ileostomy site revealed benign villous adenoma with high-grade epithelial dysplastic changes. The possibility of an invasive focus elsewhere in the lesion could not be excluded. The EGD revealed duodenal polyps, and a biopsy showed tubular adenoma.
Figure 1

A fungating growth visible at a stoma. This fungating growth at an end ileostomy was created 31 years ago, after a panproctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). An en bloc resection of the stoma showed an invasive and moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma arising in a severely dysplastic tubulovillous adenoma with foci of high-grade dysplasia at the mucocutaneous border.

A computed tomography scan of her chest, abdomen, and pelvis after oral and intravenous contrast showed no evidence of metastatic disease. Carcinoembryonic antigen was within normal range. After a discussion in the colorectal multi-disciplinary team meeting, a decision was made to keep the duodenal polyps under surveillance and to carry out a barium meal and follow through study. The results of the contrast study were clear; therefore, our patient underwent a laparotomy with en bloc small bowel resection with the ileostomy and safety margin of the skin around the stoma. About 45 cm of adherent small bowel was removed alone with the ileostomy specimen. The rest of the small bowel was examined and did not show any gross pathology. A new stoma was created in her right iliac fossa. She went home seven days after a smooth recovery from the operation.

Pathology showed an invasive, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma arising in a severely dysplastic tubulovillous adenoma with foci of high-grade dysplasia at the mucocutaneous border (Figure 2). The tumor infiltrated the submucosa and was focally present in the ileostomy stump. The remainder of the resected bowel was clear.
Figure 2

A picture of the pathology of a polypoid mass at an ileostomy. Sections from the ileostomy show an invasive and moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma arising in a severely dysplastic tubulovillous adenoma with foci of high-grade dysplasia at the mucocutaneous border.

As discovered at a follow-up one year ago, she had developed a polypoid mass at the ileostomy site (Figure 3). The results of a limited endoscopic examination of the small bowel up to 50 cm through the stoma were clear. She underwent further wide excision of the terminal ileum and refashioning of the stoma. The specimen was reported as benign tubular adenoma. The follow-up plan was to review our patient every six months in the clinic with an EGD examination every six months.
Figure 3

A recurrent polypoid mass visible at a stoma. The recurrent polypoid mass is shown at an ileostomy site two years after an en bloc resection. A wide excision of the terminal ileum and refashioning of the stoma were undertaken. The specimen was reported as benign tubular adenoma.

Discussion

FAP is an autosomal dominant inherited disease characterized by the presence of hundreds of adenomatous polyps in the colon and rectum. The annual reported incidence ranges from one in 5000 to one in 17,000 live births [2]. The incidence of small bowel malignancy is very low in the general population (seven per 1,000,000) [3]. Suarez and colleagues [4] estimated the incidence of the adenocarcinoma in all ileostomies in Britain to be two to four per 1000, indicating that ileostomies are more prone to malignant changes. In addition, many cases of adenoma in the ileal pouch after proctocolectomy for FAP have been reported and some of them have progressed to adenocarcinoma [57].

Many factors have been implicated in the malignant transformation of the ileostomy mucosa: colonic metaplasia and dysplasia of ileal mucosa, chronic irritation due to either physical or chemical trauma, ileitis, and development of chronic inflammatory polyps and malignant transformation in a pre-existing benign adenoma. In this case, we believe that the invasive adenocarcinoma was secondary to malignant transformation in a pre-existing adenoma as evident by the pathology report.

Table 1 summarizes the case reports that we were able to find. There were 13 patients (seven men and six women), and the median age was 57 years (range of 42 to 75). The median interval between stoma formation and presenting adenocarcinoma was 25 years (range of nine to 42). None of the patients had lymph node metastasis at the time of presentation. Three patients showed local skin invasion (23%). No deaths were recorded after three years of follow-up. However, two patients had a recurrence that was excised locally. The treatment was constant in all cases and included en bloc resection of the terminal ileum with its mesentery, surrounding stoma skin, and relocation of a new ileostomy. Our patient was followed up to 18 months without evidence of malignant recurrence. However, she developed a benign adenomatous polyp, which was locally excised with refashioning of the stoma.
Table 1

Primary adenocarcinoma of an ileostomy in familial adenomatous polyps

Study

Age, years

Sex

Duration, years

Tumor description

Lymph nodes

Pathology

Follow-up

Roth and Logio [8] (1982)

44

Male

9

Ulcerating polypoid mass 2 × 3 cm

N

Moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma

involving the ileostomy skin

Not stated

Ross et al. [9] (1987)

56

Female

32

Raised mass 12 × 12 cm

N

Mucinous adenocarcinoma

22 months

Primrose et al. [10] (1988)

72

Female

25

Friable mass

N

Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma

two years

Suarez et al. [4] (1988)

40

Male

29

Polypoid mass

N

Moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma

with mucocutaneous invasion

one year

Gilson and Sollenberger [11] (1992)

69

Male

40

Mass 2 × 5 cm

N

Moderately differentiated mucinous adenocarcinoma

two years

Johnson et al. [12] (1993)

65

Male

25

Polypoid exophytic mass 3.5 × 3 cm

N

Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma

one year

Lux et al. [1] (1993)

42

Male

15

Mass 12 × 12 cm

N

Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma

Not stated

Mimura et al. [13] (1999)

54

Male

21

Polypoid mass 6 × 4 × 2 cm

N

Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma

three years

Iizuka et al. [14] (2002)

55

Female

14

Polypoid mass extending from 1 to 9 o'clock

N

Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma

23 months

Hata et al. [15] (2003)

57

Female

42

Circumferential cauliflower-like polyps

N

Well-differentiated to moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma in adenoma

two years

Shenoy and Cassim [16] (2009)

60

Male

24

Polypoid mass

N

Adenocarcinoma in tubulovillous adenoma

Not stated

Matsushima [17] (2009)

75

Female

Not stated

Fungating mass

N

Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma

32 months

Present case (2010)

59

Female

34

Circumferential polypoid neoplasm 4.5 cm

N

Moderately differentiated mucinous adenocarcinoma infiltrating the deep dermis

one year

This table summarizes 13 case reports of primary adenocarcinoma of an ileostomy in familial adenomatous polyps. N, negative.

Conclusions

The number of reported cases for primary adenocarcinoma following panproctocolectomy for FAP is small. Nevertheless, it is expected that the numbers will increase in longstanding ileostomies in parallel with the duration of the stoma. Patient education and medical examination of the stoma should be implemented early with the need of designing a surveillance protocol for early detection and management of ileal adenomas, especially in longstanding stomas. Surgery should include an en bloc resection of the ileum with a generous margin of the surrounding skin and relocation of the stoma.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Abbreviations

EGD: 

esophagogastroduodenoscopy

FAP: 

familial adenomatous polyposis.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge M Madkour, who participated in patient care and helped in delivering data to the patient.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Withybush General Hospital
(2)
Whittington Hospital

References

  1. Lux N, Wedell J, Busch M, van Calker H: Adenocarcinoma of the ileostomy after total proctocolectomy in familial polyposis. A case report and synthesis of previously published cases [in German]. Chirurg. 1993, 64: 416-418.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Utsunomiya J, Lynch HT: Hereditary Colorectal Cancer: International Symposium Proceedings. 1990, Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. KView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Barclay TH, Schapira DV: Malignant tumors of the small intestine. Cancer. 1983, 51: 878-881. 10.1002/1097-0142(19830301)51:5<878::AID-CNCR2820510521>3.0.CO;2-V.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Suarez V, Alexander-Williams J, O'Connor HJ, Campos A, Fuggle WJ, Thompson H, Enker WE, Greenstein AJ: Carcinoma developing in ileostomies after 25 or more years. Gastroenterology. 1988, 95: 205-208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Tajika M, Nakamura T, Nakahara O, Kawai H, Komori K, Hirai T, Kato T, Bhatia V, Baba H, Yamao K: Prevalence of adenomas and carcinomas in the ileal pouch after proctocolectomy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009, 13: 1266-1273. 10.1007/s11605-009-0871-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Parc YR, Olschwang S, Desaint B, Schmitt G, Parc RG, Tiret E: Familial adenomatous polyposis: prevalence of adenomas in the ileal pouch after restorative proctocolectomy. Ann Surg. 2001, 233: 360-364. 10.1097/00000658-200103000-00009.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Friederich P, de Jong AE, Mathus-Vliegen LM, Dekker E, Krieken HH, Dees J, Nagengast FM, Vasen HF: Risk of developing adenomas and carcinomas in the ileal pouch in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008, 6: 1237-1242. 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.06.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Roth JA, Logio T: Carcinoma arising in an ileostomy stoma: an unusual complication of adenomatous polyposis coli. Cancer. 1982, 49: 2180-2184. 10.1002/1097-0142(19820515)49:10<2180::AID-CNCR2820491033>3.0.CO;2-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ross DS, Bussing R, Dietrich J: Carcinoma arising in an ileostomy. IMJ Ill Med J. 1987, 172: 163-166.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Primrose JN, Quirke P, Johnston D: Carcinoma of the ileostomy in a patient with familial adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg. 1988, 75: 384-10.1002/bjs.1800750430.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gilson TP, Sollenberger LL: Adenocarcinoma of an ileostomy in a patient with familial adenomatous polyposis. Report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992, 35: 261-265. 10.1007/BF02051020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson JA, Talton DS, Poole GV: Adenocarcinoma of a Brooke ileostomy for adenomatous polyposis coli. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993, 88: 1122-1124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mimura T, Kuramoto S, Yamasaki K, Kaminishi M: Familial adenomatous polyposis: a case report and histologic mucin study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1999, 28: 372-376. 10.1097/00004836-199906000-00021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Iizuka T, Sawada T, Hayakawa K, Hashimoto M, Udagawa H, Watanabe G: Successful local excision of ileostomy adenocarcinoma after colectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis: report of a case. Surg Today. 2002, 32: 638-641. 10.1007/s005950200116.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hata K, Watanabe T, Kawamura YJ, Ishigami H, Kanazawa T, Tada T, Zhao B, Koketsu S, Nagawa H: K-ras mutation and loss of heterozygosity at 17p with beta-catenin accumulation in intramucosal carcinoma of the ileostomy in familial adenomatous polyposis: a case report. Dig Dis Sci. 2003, 48: 2310-2314.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Shenoy S, Cassim R: Ileostomy adenocarcinoma associated with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP): new problem in old disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009, 24: 1475-1476. 10.1007/s00384-009-0739-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Matsushima K: Two different types of polypoid lesion at ileostomy site. Surgery. 2009, 145: 337-338. 10.1016/j.surg.2007.08.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Hammad et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.