Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Ovarian cryopreservation after laparoscopic ovariectomy using the Endo-GIA stapling device and LAPRO-clip absorbable ligating clip in a woman: a case report

  • Isabelle Roux1,
  • Michaël Grynberg1, 2,
  • Jenna Linehan1,
  • Alexandra Messner3 and
  • Xavier Deffieux1, 2, 4Email author
Journal of Medical Case Reports20115:48

https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-5-48

Received: 22 April 2010

Accepted: 3 February 2011

Published: 3 February 2011

Abstract

Introduction

Several options are available for preserving fertility before cytotoxic treatment, including ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Most reported surgical techniques include electrocoagulation. Our hypothesis is that avoidance of electrocoagulation may decrease ovarian cortex injury during cryopreservation procedures.

Case presentation

We report a laparoscopic technique of whole-ovary removal without coagulation using Endo-GIA forceps and clips. Laparoscopic ovariectomy was performed for cryopreservation in a 37-year-old Caucasian woman with breast cancer and for whom chemotherapy was planned. The procedure was completed quickly and without complication. This Endo-GIA procedure was of short duration with a short period of ischemia before freezing.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic ovariectomy using the Endo-GIA stapling device procedure without coagulation may diminish ovary injury before ovarian cryopreservation.

Introduction

Several options are available for preserving fertility before cytotoxic treatment, namely embryo cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation and ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Embryo cryopreservation results in good pregnancy rates, but the patient needs to be of pubertal or postpubertal age, have a partner and be able to undergo a cycle of ovarian stimulation [1]. Ovarian stimulation is not possible when chemotherapy cannot be delayed or when stimulation is contraindicated. Ovarian tissue transplantation after cryopreservation is an option despite being an experimental technique with few live births reported [2]. Either a part of cortical tissue [3] or whole ovary can be removed.

Case presentation

We report a laparoscopic ovariectomy technique performed for cryopreservation in a 37 year-old Caucasian woman with breast cancer and for whom chemotherapy was planned. Despite being informed of the poor outcome in women of her age, this woman elected to undergo combined techniques for fertility preservation. As an adjuvant to the tissue preservation, immature oocyte retrieval was performed one day before the surgery. During laparoscopy, the ureter and the iliac vessels were identified. Through the medial 12-mm trocar, the Endo-GIA Roticulator (Tyco Healthcare, Covidien, Elancourt, France) was used to cut the infundibulopelvic ligament and mesovarium (Figures 1 and 2). The utero-ovarian ligament was then clamped with two vascular absorbable clips (Figure 3). The removed ovary was immediately handed over to a biologist team that was present in the operating room. No complications were reported from this procedure. Pathology revealed "normal" ovarian tissue. Our hypothesis is that avoidance of electrocoagulation may decrease ovarian cortex injury during cryopreservation procedure. There are no precise data demonstrating that electrocoagulation causes damage to the ovarian tissue in the course of ovarian tissue harvesting and cryopreservation. However, many experimental studies have shown that electrocoagulation (monopolar and bipolar energies) may be associated with damage to ovarian tissue. For example, ovarian drilling, especially bipolar electrocoagulation, causes extensive destruction of the ovary [4]. Furthermore, some data suggest that bipolar electrocoagulation of the ovarian parenchyma during laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy adversely affects ovarian function [5, 6]. These data show possible impact of electrocoagulatory ovarian tissue damage on the outcome of ovarian tissue harvesting and reimplantation. Further studies should assess ovarian tissue damage and the results of ovarian cryopreservation according to the ovarian removal procedure (Endo-GIA vs. electrocoagulatory).
Figure 1

The Endo-GIA Roticulator is used to cut the infundibulopelvic ligament and mesovarium.

Figure 2

Cutting the mesovarium using the Endo-GIA stapling device.

Figure 3

Clamping the utero-ovarian ligament using vascular absorbable clips.

This Endo-GIA procedure was of short duration with a short period of ischemia before freezing. Furthermore, it is known that the Endo-GIA stapling device requires significantly less time than electrocoagulation [7]. However, some centers do not remove a whole ovary for ovarian tissue cryopreservation; instead, they remove only half to two-thirds of one macroscopically normal ovary's cortex. The Endo-GIA removal procedure cannot be used in these cases.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic ovariectomy using the Endo-GIA stapling device procedure without coagulation is an optional ovariectomy technique that should diminish ovary injury before ovarian cryopreservation.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review from the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
AP-HP, Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction, Hôpital Antoine Béclère
(2)
Faculté de Médecine Paris Sud, Univ Paris-Sud
(3)
AP-HP, Department of Reproductive Biology, Antoine Béclère Hospital
(4)
ER6, UPMC

References

  1. American Society for Reproductive Medicine, The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology: Ovarian tissue and oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2008, 90 (suppl): S241-S246.Google Scholar
  2. Donnez J, Dolmans MM, Demylle D, Jadoul P, Pirard C, Squifflet J, Martinez-Madrid B, Van Langendonckt A: Livebirth after orthotopic transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue. Lancet. 2004, 36: 1405-1410. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17222-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Meirow D, Fasouliotis SJ, Nugent D, Schenker JG, Gosden RG, Rutherford AJ: A laparoscopic technique for obtaining ovarian cortical biopsy specimens for fertility conservation in patients with cancer. Fertil Steril. 1999, 71: 948-951. 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00067-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hendriks ML, van der Valk P, Lambalk CB, Broeckaert MA, Homburg R, Hompes PG: Extensive tissue damage of bovine ovaries after bipolar ovarian drilling compared to monopolar electrocoagulation or carbon dioxide laser. Fertil Steril. 2010, 93 (3): 969-75. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.046.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Zanconato G, Bergamini V, Berlanda N: Bipolar electrocoagulation versus suture of solitary ovary after laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometriomas. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004, 11 (3): 344-347. 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60048-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Li CZ, Liu B, Wen ZQ, Sun Q: The impact of electrocoagulation on ovarian reserve after laparoscopic excision of ovarian cysts: a prospective clinical study of 191 patients. Fertil Steril. 2009, 92 (4): 1428-1435. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.071.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sharp HT, Dorsey JH, Holtz PM, Melick CF: Electrocoagulation versus the Endo GIA in LAVH. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996, 3 (4 suppl): S45-S46. 10.1016/S1074-3804(96)80291-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Roux et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement