Skip to main content


  • Case report
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Use of intra-medullary stacked nailing in the reduction of proximal plastic deformity in a pediatric Monteggia fracture: a case report

Journal of Medical Case Reports20115:153

  • Received: 29 November 2010
  • Accepted: 16 April 2011
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports



In a Monteggia fracture dislocation, it is important to reduce the ulnar fracture completely. Extensive plastic deformation of the proximal ulna may make reduction by closed manipulation impossible.

Case presentation

We report the case of a four-year-old Caucasian boy in whom the plastic deformation of the proximal ulna was reduced, and this reduction was maintained, using intra-medullary stacked nailing.


The technique of stacked nailing is a useful addition to the armamentarium in the management of the potentially awkward Monteggia fracture.


  • Radial Head
  • Forearm Fracture
  • Ulnar Fracture
  • Radial Head Dislocation
  • Monteggia Fracture


A Monteggia fracture is a fracture of the ulna associated with a radio-capitellar dislocation [1, 2]. Pediatric Monteggia injuries, in contrast to those of adults, are usually managed effectively by closed reduction [1]. In a recent one-year series of forearm fractures in Glasgow, Monteggia fracture dislocations accounted for only a minority of injuries (4 ex 317) [3]. Though uncommon, it is vital to recognize the radio-capitellar dissociation early. The ulnar fracture is usually apparent on clinical and radiological assessment, but up to 50% of radio-capitellar dissociations are missed by senior house officers and 25% are not recognized by senior radiologists [4]. In our center, a review of Monteggia fracture dislocations between 1992 and 2001 showed that about 20% (eight of 39) were initially missed [5]. Adequate treatment is important for achieving good results and to avoid secondary corrective surgery, as missed Monteggia lesions or chronic radial head dislocations may require later reconstruction, which is fraught with potential complications [6].

The current classification of the Monteggia lesion proposed by Bado [2] is widely accepted as standard for adult lesions. The classification scheme of Letts et al. [7] for pediatric Monteggia fractures emphasizes the character of the ulnar fracture: A = anterior bend, B = anterior greenstick, C = anterior complete, D = posterior and E = lateral. A stable anatomic reduction of the ulnar fracture usually results in reduction of the radial head [8]. Of the options for the Monteggia fracture dislocation in children, the most common is a manipulative reduction with long-arm cast immobilization in elbow flexion. When the fracture dislocation is unstable or becomes displaced, open reduction and/or internal fixation may be indicated [911]. Ring et al. [8] also emphasized the importance of the type of ulnar fracture and that plastic deformation of the ulna must be reduced.

De la Garza [12] alluded to the technique of using multiple pins, nesting them within the medullary canal to stabilize the ulna. Ulnar intra-medullary wires can also be used to treat complete transverse and short oblique fractures to prevent angular deformity. These procedures can be done either via an antegrade approach by passing the intra-medullary nail through the olecranon or by using a retrograde approach through the distal ulnar metaphysis. However, if the ulnar fracture is comminuted or has a long, oblique pattern, plate and screw fixation may be required. There may also be a need to remove interposed soft tissue or bony fragments to allow for radial head reduction [10].

Thus it is important to reduce the ulnar fracture, but in patients with extensive proximal plastic deformity, this may prove impossible by manipulation alone. Here we present a case involving the use of a technique that allows for closed reduction and stabilization.

Case presentation

A four-year-old Caucasian boy with no medical history presented to our emergency department with a right forearm fracture after falling out of a tree. His neurovasculature was intact. Radiography showed a fracture of the proximal ulnar metaphysis with marked varus angulation and dislocation of the radial head both anteriorly and laterally (Figure 1), a combined Bado [2] types I and III Monteggia fracture dislocation. There was no associated distal fracture.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Injury films showing extensive plastic bowing of the proximal ulna and a radio-capitellar dislocation.

A closed reduction was attempted on the following day in the surgical theater, but the proximal ulnar fracture was irreducible by manipulation. Therefore, a percutaneous technique using intra-medullary diaphyseal wiring was performed (Figure 2). Initially, a 1 cm incision over the olecranon served as an entry point for two antegrade K-wires into the proximal fragment. These were used as a joystick to reduce the plastic bow of the ulna and were then advanced down the medulla (Figure 3). A third K-wire was inserted in a similar fashion, resulting in a tight intra-medullary fit that reduced the ulna and the radio-capitellar joint concomitantly (Figure 4). A plaster of Paris cast was applied to maintain the right forearm in mid-supination and 100° degree flexion.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Image intensifier anteroposterior and lateral views after attempted manipulation of the right elbow. Although the position is marginally improved, there is still extensive plastic deformation of the ulna as well as radio-capitellar dislocation.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Image intensifier lateral views showing reduction maneuver using K-wires. Serial views show the use of two proximal K-wires as a joystick to reduce the proximal ulnar deformity.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Image intensifier anteroposterior and lateral views of stacked nailing of the right elbow. A third K-wire provided an intra-medullary jam fit, which both reduces and stabilizes the Monteggia fracture dislocation.

Post-operatively, he attended weekly clinic appointments with serial radiographs confirming continued reduction (Figure 5). After the forearm had been immobilized for six weeks, the K-wires were removed with the boy under general anesthesia.
Figure 5
Figure 5

Anteroposterior and lateral views showing healing of the elbow 6 weeks after the operation.


In our present case report, the problem was one of proximal ulnar bowing with substantial plastic deformity which was irreducible by manipulation alone. Two K-wires inserted longitudinally into the proximal fragment were used as a joystick to partially reduce the ulnar bowing, which was further reduced by passing the K-wires distally. A third K-wire was then added as a jam fit, as is done in the technique of bundle nailing with intra-medullary wires.

The technique described above is similar to that named after Hackethal [13] for his description of stacked nailing as applied to the humerus. Intra-medullary K-wire stabilization is technically easy and minimally invasive. Rabinovich et al. [14] suggested that nailing of the skeletally immature ulna can be safely accomplished via antegrade insertion through the olecranon apophysis. Although this approach was successful in our patient with combined Bado types I and III fractures, we have no experience in using this technique in other Bado type fractures (such as the rare type IV fracture, in which there is an associated radial shaft fracture). However, in accordance with the Letts et al. classification scheme [7], we suggest that it is largely the character of the ulnar fracture that determines the strategy for reduction and/or fixation; that is, whatever the direction of the radio-capitellar dislocation and whatever associated injuries there are, if there is proximal plastic deformity of the ulna that does not yield to manipulation, then this technique may be useful.

In conclusion, in the context of potentially problematic plastic deformation, we have extended the use of stacked nailing to perform both the reduction and stabilization of a pediatric Monteggia fracture dislocation.








Authors’ Affiliations

University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK
Orthopaedic Department, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Dalnair Street, Yorkhill, Glasgow, G3 8SJ, UK


  1. Rodgers WB, Waters PM, Hall JE: Chronic Monteggia lesions in children: complications and results of reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996, 78: 1322-1329.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bado JL: The Monteggia lesion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1967, 50: 71-86. 10.1097/00003086-196701000-00008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell SW, McLaughlin D, Huntley JS: Paediatric forearm fractures in the West of Scotland [Abstract 1857]. J Bone Joint Surg Br.Google Scholar
  4. Gleeson AP, Beattie TF: Monteggia fracture-dislocation in children. J Accid Emerg Med. 1994, 11: 192-194.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. David-West KS, Wilson NI, Sherlock DA, Bennet GC: Missed Monteggia injuries. Injury. 2005, 36: 1206-1209. 10.1016/j.injury.2004.12.033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nakamura K, Hirachi K, Uchiyama S, Takahara M, Minami A, Imaeda T, Kato H: Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes after open reduction for missed Monteggia fracture-dislocations in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009, 91: 1394-1404. 10.2106/JBJS.H.00644.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Letts M, Locht R, Wiens J: Monteggia fracture-dislocations in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985, 67: 724-727.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ring D, Jupiter JB, Waters PM: Monteggia fractures in children and adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998, 6: 215-224.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wilkins KE: Changes in the management of Monteggia fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002, 22: 548-554. 10.1097/00004694-200207000-00025.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Pesl T, Havránek P: [Monteggia lesions in the growing skeleton: principles of therapy] [in Czech]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010, 77: 32-38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Güven M, Eren A, Kadioğlu B, Yavuz U, Kilinçoğlu V, Ozkan K: [The results of treatment in pediatric Monteggia equivalent lesions] [in Turkish]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2008, 42: 90-96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. De la Garza JF: Monteggia fracture-dislocation in children. Rockwood and Wilkins' Fractures in Children. Edited by: Beaty JH, Kasser JR. 2006, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 491-541. 6Google Scholar
  13. Hackethal KH: [Bundle nailing: a method of marrow nailing of long tubular bones] [in German]. Langenbecks Arch Klin Chir Ver Dtsch Z Chir. 1961, 298: 1001-1003. 10.1007/BF02435415.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rabinovich A, Adili A, Mah J: Outcomes of intramedullary nail fixation through the olecranon apophysis in skeletally immature forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005, 25: 565-569. 10.1097/01.bpo.0000173249.04561.10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Lim and Huntley; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.