Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Severe hydrops in the infant of a Rhesus D-positive mother due to anti-c antibodies diagnosed antenatally: a case report

  • Shilpa Singla1Email author,
  • Sunesh Kumar1,
  • Kallol Kumar Roy1,
  • Jai Bhagwan Sharma1 and
  • Garima Kachhawa1
Journal of Medical Case Reports20104:57

https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-4-57

Received: 11 October 2008

Accepted: 18 February 2010

Published: 18 February 2010

Abstract

Introduction

Rhesus haemolytic disease of the newborn is a prototype of maternal isoimmunisation and fetal haemolytic disease. There are other rare blood group antigens capable of causing alloimmunisation and haemolytic disease such as c, C, E, Kell and Duffy. In India, after the confirmation of a newborn's blood group, antibodies are screened only if the mother is Rehsus D-negative negative and the father is Rhesus D-positive. Hydrops in Rhesus positive women are investigated along the lines of non-immune hydrops.

Case presentation

We report the case of a patient from India where irregular antibodies were requested for an O-positive 26-year-old mother in order to investigate fetal hydrops. Anti-c antibody was revealed and the fetus was treated successfully with compatible O negative and c negative intrauterine blood transfusions. The baby was treated postnatally with double volume exchange transfusion with the same compatible blood, and was discharged 30 days after birth.

Conclusion

We highlight the importance of conducting irregular antibody screening for women with significant obstetric history and fetal hydrops. This could assist in diagnosing and successfully treating the fetus with appropriate antigen negative cross-matched compatible blood. We note, however, that anti-c immunoglobulin is not yet readily available.

Introduction

Haemolytic disease of the newborn is a well-recognised entity because of the isoimmunisation of Rhesus D-negative mother in an Rh-positive fetus. Severe degrees of fetal hemolysis result in fetal hydrops [1]. Although anti-Rh(D) was once the major etiology of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN), the widespread adoption of antenatal and postnatal Rhesus immunoglobulin has resulted in a marked decrease in the prevalence of alloimmunisation due to the RhD antigen present during pregnancy. Maternal alloimmunisation to other red cell antigens remains the cause of fetal disease since no prophylactic immunoglobulins are available to prevent the formation of these antibodies [2].

Mild to severe cases of fetal haemolytic disease have been reported when anti-c, C, e, E, or Kell, Kidd, Duffy, MNS, Lutheran, Diego, Xg, P antibodies, as well as other private and public blood group systems found in the sera of mothers [3]. It is recommended that routine red cell antibody screening be done at the first appointment in pregnant mothers and, if no antibodies are detected, once more in the third trimester between 28 and 36 weeks [4]. The guidelines state that further testing is unnecessary, since immunisation during late pregnancy is unlikely to result in an antibody concentration that would be sufficient to cause severe haemolytic disease of the neonate [4].

However, in the majority of transfusion and antenatal care centres in India and other developing countries, routine antenatal antibody screening is done only for Rh(D)-negative mothers to screen for Anti-D antibodies. Hence, there may be a serious delay in diagnosing HDFN due to the rarity of antigens [5]. The first case of haemolytic disease of the newborn due to anti-c antibodies in India was published in a retrospective diagnosis made in 2007. Fetal affection was noted to be of a milder variety, where the baby was managed only with intravenous immunoglobulin and phototherapy [5].

Here we report the first known case of antenatally diagnosed anti-c antibodies that resulted in severe fetal hydrops, thus requiring multiple in utero and ex utero transfusions.

Case presentation

A 26-year-old Indian woman was admitted to our gastroenterology unit with extrahepatic portal vein obstruction with features of massive malena at 29 weeks of gestation. She had a previous pregnancy that resulted in a single offspring. She was referred for an antenatal check-up to our obstetric unit, where after clinical examination, an ultrasonography was performed which revealed gross fetal hydrops. She was transferred to our obstetric unit for further evaluation and management.

Her prenatal course was complicated by recurrent episodes of hematemesis and malena for 10 years prior to admission and she was previously diagnosed with esophageal varices. She had a history of multiple blood transfusions and sclerotherapy sessions. Her first pregnancy was 2 years prior to admission, in which she had regular supervised antenatal checkups on her first and second trimesters with a normal anomaly scan. Her pregnancy was complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus that was controlled through diet. She had episodes of recurrent malena in this pregnancy. Her third trimester was unsupervised at home and she was admitted to a local private practitioner at the onset of her labour. She underwent caesarean section for meconium-stained liquor. She delivered a grossly normal male baby with jaundice at birth. Details pertaining to the baby are not available, but the baby had received a blood transfusion on the third day of life and died on the seventh day.

Her present pregnancy was a spontaneous conception. Her first and second trimester antenatal checkups were with a private practitioner in her hometown. She presented in the gastroenterology department of our institute at 29 weeks of gestation with massive malena and anemia. Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy revealed the presence of grade II esophageal varices for which sclerotherapy was done. She was given three units of packed red blood cells to raise her haemoglobin from 6 gm% to 10 gm%. Upon obstetric referral, ultrasonography at 30 weeks and 5 days revealed severe fetal hydrops. Doppler studies were suggestive of fetal anemia. She was given corticosteroids for fetal lung maturity. At 31 weeks, cordocentesis was done and intravascular intrauterine fetal transfusion with O-negative cross-matched blood was given. Since she was Rhesus (D) O type positive, non-immune hydrops was suspected. Fetal blood was thus sent for blood grouping, haemoglobin, haematocrit, TORCH serology, parvovirus B19 serology, haemoglobin electrophoresis, G6PD enzyme assay and karyotype.

The results of fetal echocardiography were normal. Fetal blood group was A-positive and was negative in workup for non-immune hydrops. Maternal serum indirect Coomb's test was positive, thus leading to a suspicion of the presence of non-anti-D antibodies. A special request was sent to the blood bank to screen for uncommon rare blood groups and non-D antibodies. Anti-c was detected in maternal serum in 1:4 dilutions.

Maternal blood was resent to the blood bank to establish exact Rhesus haplotype, which was determined to be R1R1 (CDe/CDe). The fetus was monitored with bi-weekly biophysical profiling and a second intrauterine transfusion was given one week later with compatible O-negative and c-negative cross-matched blood. At 32 weeks and 5 days, an emergency caesarean section was done due to poor biophysical profile.

A grossly hydropic female baby with a birth weight of 1.6 kg was born with massive ascites, hepatosplenomegaly, pallor and hypotonia. At birth, 150 ml of ascitic tap was done and the baby was transferred to the nursery on bag and tube ventilation. Her cord blood hematocrit was 15 and total serum bilirubin was 6.5 mg/dl. A partial exchange transfusion followed by double volume exchange transfusion with O-positive, c-negative blood was performed. Intravenous immunoglobulin in doses of 1 gram/kg was administered after the exchange. The baby required intense phototherapy for 4 days. By the second week, she developed conjugated hyperbilirubinemia due to inspissated bile syndrome, which resolved on its own. The baby was then managed conservatively and was discharged in stable condition on the 30th day of her life.

The fetal rhesus haplotype was established finally as cDe/cDe. The source of maternal isoimmunisation may be either fetomaternal haemorrhage in the mother s current or previous pregnancy or from multiple blood transfusions.

Discussion

Fetal hydrops may be classified as either immune or non-immune. Non-immune hydrops result from reasons other than antigen to antibody incompatibility. Immune hydrops results from maternal antibodies that are capable of crossing the placenta to react with fetal antigen, thus causing a reaction that manifests as fetal haemolysis. In the largest retrospective review on the etiology of hydrops [6] involving 598 patients, the cause of hydrops was established unclearly in 26.3% of cases, isoimmunisation in 4.5% of cases, and non-immune etiology in 69.2% of cases. When isoimmunisation is identified as the cause, Rhesus antigens were responsible for 4.2% of cases. There were only two cases due to non-Rh antigens, one each due to Kell and to Duffy [6].

Out of 49 known Rhesus antigens, only 5 (c, C, D, e, E) are well known. There is no d antigen. Besides this, there are other rare blood group systems like Kell, Duffy (Fya and FYb), Kidd (JKa and JKb), and the M and N system [7].

CDe is the most common haplotype in Caucasians (42%), Native Americans (44%) and Asians (70%) [8]. In various retrospective studies, haemolytic disease of the newborn has been reported due to Anti-c antibodies [911]. The frequency of D and Non-D antigens differ in different populations with respect to their ethnic origin [1214].

It is important to check that patients with anti-c antibodies do not have any additional antibodies for although these might not compound any HDFN, they would certainly delay the provision of compatible blood for transfusion [9]. Bowell et al. (1986) observed a strong co-association of anti-c with anti-E in 41% of their subject population [9]. Perinatal mortality due to anti-c alone is usually much lower than that of Anti-D (1 in 250,000 versus 1 in 25,600 births, respectively) [15].

However, the combination of anti-c and anti-E antigens can cause the occurrence of severe fetal and neonatal haemolytic disease [3].

The management of anti-c isoimmunisation or isoimmunisation with any other irregular red blood cell antibody is similar to the management of anti-D isoimmunised pregnancy, with a specification that blood used for fetal and/or neonatal transfusion should be negative for its respective antibody. Critical titre needs to be standardized with respect to individual laboratories. In a series by Hackney et al. [11], a critical titre of 1:32 without supplementation with ultrasound and a critical titre of 1:16 supplemented with ultrasonographic features of hydrops were considered significant. In our patient, a dilution titre of 1:4 was associated with fetal hydrops and no other irregular antibody or any other cause of non-immune hydrops could be attributed. There was a significant improvement in fetal and neonatal anemia following transfusion with c-negative blood, attributing it as the sole cause of fetal haemolysis and hydrops. However, fetal and/or neonatal direct Coomb s test (DCT) positivity does not necessarily correlate with a severe haemolytic disease. DCT may be negative in anti-c isoimmunisation as this antibody is often present in small titres [9]. Serologic evaluation of maternal antibodies thus remains the cornerstone of management as approximately only 50% of antigen positive fetuses require a more invasive testing [11].

Our experience in the management of our patient was similar to that of other authors [3, 5, 11]. However, instead of the traditional method of spectrophotometric evaluation of amniotic fluid OD 450 to assess fetal bilirubin due to severity of haemolysis, anemia was assessed using the more modern method of colour Doppler ultrasound and of plotting peak systolic velocity of the middle cerebral artery on Mari charts [16]. However, fetal anemia may not have been severe enough to be detected by Mari s criteria of the middle cerebral artery peak velocity, which highlights the usefulness of the traditional Liley curve and the Queenan charts.

Through this case report, we want to emphasize the potential developing immune hydrops due to irregular red blood cell antibodies. This contribution to the literature is of particular importance since there is an observed paucity of data on the prevalence of irregular antibodies in the Indian population, despite having one of the highest obstetric loads in the world.

Conclusions

There is a need to impose properly formulated protocols to screen pregnant women with unfavourable obstetric history of late trimester mishaps and pregnancies with fetal hydrops. Blood bank guidelines for the screening of maternal serum antibodies and facilities have to be updated to decrease the occurrence of preventable perinatal morbidity and mortality.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient and from the mother on behalf of the infant for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Abbreviations

DCT: 

direct Coombs test

GI: 

gastrointestinal

G6PD: 

Glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase

HDFN: 

haemolytic disease of the fetus and/or newborn

OD: 

optical density.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences

References

  1. Klein HG, Anstee DJ: Haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Mollison s Blood Transfusion in Clinical Medicine. Edited by: Klein HG, Anstee DJ. 2005, United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 496-545. full_text. 11View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Moise KJ: Fetal anemia due to non-Rhesus-D red-cell alloimmunisation. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008, 13: 207-214. 10.1016/j.siny.2008.02.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Babinszki A, Berkowitz RL: Haemolytic disease of the newborn caused by anti-c, anti-E and anti-Fya antibodies: report of five cases. Prenat Diagn. 1999, 19: 533-536. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199906)19:6<533::AID-PD570>3.0.CO;2-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Voak D, Mitchell R, Bowel P, Letsky E, de Silva M, Whittle M: Guidelines for blood grouping and red cell antibody testing during pregnancy. British Committee for Standards in Haematology, Blood Transfusion Task Force. Transfus Med. 1996, 6: 71-74. 10.1046/j.1365-3148.1996.d01-518.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Thakral B, Agrawal SK, Dhawan HK, Saluja K, Dutta S, Marwaha N: First report from India of haemolytic disease of newborn by anti-c and anti-E in Rh (D) positive mothers. Hematology. 2007, 12: 377-380. 10.1080/10245330701448438.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Abrams ME, Meredith KS, Kinnard P, Clark RH: Hydrops fetalis: a retrospective review of cases reported to a large national database and identification of risk factors associated with death. Pediatrics. 2007, 120: 84-89. 10.1542/peds.2006-3680.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dean L, editor : Blood groups and red cell antigens. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine(US), NCBI. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bookshelf/br.fcgi?book=rbcantigen]
  8. Reid ME, Lomas-Francis C: The Blood Group Antigen FactsBook. 2004, New York: Elsevier Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowell PJ, Brown SE, Dike AE, Inskip MJ: The significance of anti-c alloimmunisation in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986, 93: 1044-1048.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Astrup J, Kornstad L: Presence of anti-c in the serum of 42 women giving birth to c positive babies: serological and clinical findings. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1977, 56: 185-188. 10.3109/00016347709162118.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hackney DN, Knudtson EJ, Rossi KQ, Krugh D, O'Shaughnessy RW: Management of pregnancies complicated by anti-c isoimmunisation. Obstet Gynecol. 2004, 103: 24-30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gottvall T, Filbey D: Alloimmunisation in pregnancy during the years 1992-2005 in the central west region of Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008, 87: 843-848. 10.1080/00016340802268880.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Wu YJ, Wu Y, Chen BC, Liu Y: Detection and analysis of anti-Rh blood group antibodies. Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008, 24: 604-606.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lenkiewicz B, Zupańska B: ignificance of alloantibodies other than anti-D haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDF/N). Ginekol Pol. 2003, 74: S48-54.Google Scholar
  15. Clarke CA, Mollison PL: Deaths from Rh haemolytic disease of fetus and newborn, 1977-1987. J R Coll Phys. 1989, 23: 181-184.Google Scholar
  16. Mari G: Noninvasive diagnosis by Doppler ultrasonography of fetal anemia due to maternal red cell alloimmunisation. N Engl J Med. 2000, 342: 9-14. 10.1056/NEJM200001063420102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Singla et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.