This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Paradoxical embolism following thromboaspiration of an arteriovenous fistula thrombosis: a case report
© Bentaarit et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 24 October 2009
Accepted: 28 October 2010
Published: 28 October 2010
Paradoxical embolism is an increasingly reported cause of arterial embolism. Several embolic sources have been described, but thrombosis of an arteriovenous fistula as a paradoxical emboligenic source has not, to the best of our knowledge, been reported.
A 50-year-old Caucasian woman received a renal graft for primary hyperoxaluria. After transplantation, she was maintained on daily hemodialysis. Thrombosis of her arteriovenous fistula occurred two weeks post-transplantation and was treated by thromboaspiration, which was partially successful. During a hemodialysis session immediately following thromboaspiration, she developed a coma with tetraplegia requiring intensive cardiorespiratory resuscitation. Brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed various hyperdense areas in the vertebrobasilar territory resulting from bilateral occlusion of posterior cerebral arteries. Transesophageal echocardiographic examination showed a patent foramen ovale, while pulse echography of the arteriovenous fistula revealed the persistence of extensive clots that were probably the embolic source. A paradoxical embolus through a patent foramen ovale was suggested because of the proximity of the neurological event to the thrombectomy procedure.
The risk of paradoxical embolism in a hemodialyzed patient with a patent foramen ovale deserves consideration and requires careful evaluation in situations of arteriovenous fistula thrombosis.
The foramen ovale is usually obliterated following the establishment of adult circulation, but remains patent in 25% of individuals . This potential communication between the venous and arterial circulation can allow thromboembolic material to bypass the lungs and enter the systemic circulation. Paradoxical embolism occurs when a thrombus from the venous circulation passes into the arterial circulation through an intracardiac or vascular defect. We describe a case of paradoxical embolization through a patent foramen ovale (PFO) following thromboaspiration for acute thrombosis of an arteriovenous (AV) fistula. Although the risk of pulmonary embolism in this setting is well documented , to the best of our knowledge, no paradoxical embolism after thromboaspiration has been reported.
A 50-year-old Caucasian woman was admitted for kidney transplantation. Renal history began at 10 years of age when she was hospitalized for several episodes of ureteral colic due to recurrent stone disease. She was married with four children. During each pregnancy, she was treated for hypertension. At 40 years of age, she was evaluated for severe arterial hypertension. Investigations revealed proteinuria (2 gr/24 h) and an increase in plasma creatinine (12 μmol/dL). Renal ultrasound showed multiple stones in the left kidney and bladder, while the right kidney was atrophied. The diagnosis of primary hyperoxaluria type I was established by the detection of the G170R mutation in the peroxisomal alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase (AGT) gene. The residual activity of AGT was less than 28% in biopsied liver tissue from our patient. As chronic renal failure progressed, our patient experienced, at 44 years of age, multiple embolic episodes involving the femoral arteries, hypogastric arteries, splenic artery and renal arteries, and requiring surgical thrombectomy. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed an intraventricular thrombus associated with hypokinesia of the apical region and the interventricular septum. Hematological studies including tests for thrombophilia (protein C and protein S deficiency, factor V Leiden, anti-thrombin III deficiency, and anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome) and serum homocysteine concentrations yielded normal results. An electrocardiogram did not reveal any signs of atrial fibrillation or myocardial infarction.
Our patient was discharged from the intensive care department with stable renal function (serum creatinine at 15 μmol/dL) two months after admission. The serum oxalate concentration was 2.15 μmol/dL (normal: below 33 μmol/dL). Neurological evaluation six months after the stroke showed the persistence of weakness predominantly in the inferior limbs, as well as dysarthria, anterograde amnesia and hyperemotivity.
The number of patients maintained on periodic hemodialysis is increasing due to the improvement of the long term survival of this patient population and because of an exponential increase of diabetic kidney disease. Currently, the management of AV fistula thrombosis is essentially based on thromboaspiration performed by an interventional radiologist. This technique is commonly endowed with a high rate of success and a low rate of complications .
Pulmonary embolisms as well as fatal paradoxical embolism of the brain after percutaneous thrombolysis of a hemodialysis graft have been reported . These complications remain rare, as shown by the finding that in a large series totaling 1460 cases treated by mechanical thrombolysis, no symptomatic pulmonary or systemic embolisms occurred . Nonetheless, the morbidity and mortality rates are more significant in patients with paradoxical embolism .
The clinical diagnosis of paradoxical embolism requires the presence of deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism, an intracardiac defect with a right-to-left shunt, associated with the absence of an emboligenic source in the left side of the heart. In our patient, the timing of the paradoxical embolism, which occurred after a thromboaspiration procedure for AV fistula thrombosis, the absence of an arterial emboligenic source and the documentation of a PFO with left-to-right shunt by TEE strongly suggest that the brain emboli arose from the thrombosed AV fistula. The severity of the paradoxical embolism made it impossible to perform contrast or bubble echocardiography to visualize the inversion of the shunt in the early phase of the stroke. Paradoxical embolism results from the inversion of the shunt, caused by an acute increase in right atrial pressure, in our case a possible direct consequence of the thromboaspiration procedure through venous migration of the clots or hemodynamic changes. When right atrial pressure exceeds that of the left, the inversion of the shunt (right-to-left) occurs through the PFO. More rarely, an acute elevation of right atrial pressure can occur in the setting of chronic pulmonary heart disease or Valsalva maneuver. In our patient, pulse echography did not detect any vein thrombosis, except that of the AV fistula. Paradoxical embolism is frequently associated with pulmonary embolism, which is a common cause of increased right atrial pressure.
Given that the prevalence of PFO is 25% in the general population, the possibility of a paradoxical embolism must be suspected in patients who present with arterial embolism without a clearly identified cause such as atrial fibrillation, carotid artery stenosis or cholesterol embolism. A PFO has been diagnosed in 50% of patients with stroke compared with 15% of control subjects . The most frequent sites of paradoxical embolism are the extremities (50%) and the brain (40%), while the heart, spleen and kidney are more rarely affected .
In this case, multiple emboli occurring while our patient displayed moderate renal failure probably arose from the intraventricular thrombus revealed by transthoracic echocardiography. In retrospect, it is possible that this mural thrombus may have masked a pre-existing PFO. A paradoxical embolism revealing a vermicular thrombus trapped in the PFO with floating parts in the right and left atrium, complicating a deep-vein thrombosis of the right superficial femoral vein, has recently been reported in an 85-year-old woman . Paradoxical embolism involving multiple organs has also been reported .
The diagnosis of PFO is best accomplished by contrast or bubble TEE because it more accurately reveals PFOs with a right-to-left atrial shunt. Its sensitivity and its specificity approach 96% .
The treatment of paradoxical embolism includes anti-platelet agents, systemic anticoagulation and closure of the PFO . In its acute phase, paradoxical embolism is usually treated by thrombolytic and heparin therapy, followed by anti-vitamin-K therapy, which should be continued for three to six months. Anti-vitamin-K therapy should be continued indefinitely in the following situations: (i) recurrent paradoxical embolism; (ii) persistent PFO; (iii) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-induced pulmonary hypertension that leads to increased right atrial pressure and shunting through the PFO. Given the prevalence of PFO in the general population, closure is indicated only in some pathological situations such as recurrent paradoxical embolism or when systemic anti-coagulation is contraindicated. Closure can be accomplished by percutaneous or surgical methods.
The severity and potential fatal outcome of paradoxical embolism raises the question of PFO screening in patients treated by hemodialysis. When a patient with a PFO with a known right-to-left shunt develops thrombosis of an AV fistula, it is advisable for the interventional radiologist and the surgeon to choose the technique that presents the lowest risk of embolization, while informing the patient of the potential risk.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the journal's Editor-in-Chief.
- Desai AJ, Fuller CJ, Jesurum JT, Reisman M: Patent foramen ovale and cerebrovascular diseases. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2006, 3: 446-455. 10.1038/ncpcardio0597.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Briefel GR, Regan F, Petronis JD: Cerebral embolism after mechanical thrombolysis of a clotted hemodialysis access. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999, 34: 341-343. 10.1016/S0272-6386(99)70365-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bush RL, Lin PH, Lumsden AB: Management of thrombosed dialysis access: thrombectomy versus thrombolysis. Semin Vasc Surg. 2004, 17: 32-39. 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2003.11.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beathard GA, Welch BR, Maidment HJ: Mechanical thrombolysis for the treatment of thrombosed hemodialysis access grafts. Radiology. 1996, 200: 711-716.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Webster MW, Chancellor AM, Smith HJ, Swift DL, Sharpe DN, Bass NM, Glasgow GL: Patent foramen ovale in young stroke patients. Lancet. 1988, 2: 11-12. 10.1016/S0140-6736(88)92944-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gill TJ, Campbell CC: Radial artery occlusion by a paradoxical embolism: a case report. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1995, 20: 406-407. 10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80096-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dorr M, Hummel A: Images in clinical medicine. Paradoxical embolism--thrombus in a patent foramen ovale. N Engl J Med. 2007, 357: 2285-10.1056/NEJMicm066931.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Turedi S, Gunduz A, Eroglu O, Hos G, Durmus I, Gokce M, Bulbul Y: Paradoxical embolism involving 4 organ systems (pulmonary, renal, splenic, and hepatic artery). Am J Emerg Med. 2007, 25: e731-733.Google Scholar
- Chen WJ, Kuan P, Lien WP, Lin FY: Detection of patent foramen ovale by contrast transesophageal echocardiography. Chest. 1992, 101: 1515-1520. 10.1378/chest.101.6.1515.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nendaz M, Sarasin FP, Bogousslavsky J: How to prevent stroke recurrence in patients with patent foramen ovale: anticoagulants, antiaggregants, foramen closure, or nothing?. Eur Neurol. 1997, 37: 199-204. 10.1159/000117442.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.