- Case report
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Laparoscopic management of a cavitated noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn of a unicornuate uterus: a case report
© Zapardiel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 22 September 2009
- Accepted: 19 July 2010
- Published: 19 July 2010
A unicornuate uterus with a rudimentary horn is the most uncommon uterine anomaly of the female genital tract. It has an estimated frequency of one in 100,000 among the fertile female population. This anomaly results from the abnormal maturation of one Müllerian duct with the normal development of the contralateral one.
We report here the case of a 14-year-old Caucasian girl who came to our hospital with intense dysmenorrhea. Imaging techniques revealed a unicornuate uterus with a rudimentary horn and a large hematosalpinx. We performed a laparoscopic removal of this uterine anomaly without any complication in the postoperative period.
In our case report, we demonstrate that laparoscopy is the best approach for the treatment of IIb Müllerian abnormalities. Laparoscopy resulted in anatomical and reproductive results equivalent to those offered by a laparotomic approach, but with the additional advantages of minimally invasive surgery, such as better cosmetic results and postoperative period, which are essential for very young patients.
- Fallopian Tube
- Female Genital Tract
- Vaginal Septum
- Rudimentary Horn
A unicornuate uterus with a rudimentary horn is the most uncommon uterine anomaly of the female genital tract. It has an estimated frequency of one in 100,000 among the fertile female population . This anomaly results from the abnormal maturation of one Müllerian duct with the normal development of the contralateral one. There are few cases published and just one short case series . We report the case of a laparoscopic removal of this uterine anomaly that was associated with a large hematosalpinx.
Uterine Müllerian abnormalities occur when the embryo is just 20 mm long. All the anatomical variations are classified by the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. A unicornuate uterus with a noncommunicating rudimentary horn belongs to group II-b, which may be differentiated by a complete uterine septum bicollis with an obstructed longitudinal vaginal septum. This is diagnosed by a physical vaginal exploration as we did in this case. This subtype of anomaly is associated with endometriosis, by means of a retrograde menstruation, and also with renal abnormalities, both of which should be assessed before any treatment [3, 4]. It is not clear whether a unicornuate uterus occurs more often on the right side. While some manuscripts report a frequency of 80% for the right-sided type, others report an estimated frequency of 62% . In our present case, we observed a right-sided malformation with a firm attachment to the unicornuate uterus. In such cases, it is mandatory to perform a complete and strict preoperative evaluation and diagnosis. These patients usually present with diffuse pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea caused by hematometra in the cavitated rudimentary horn (such as the one described in our patient) endometriosis, pyometra, or torsion of the abnormal portion or the Fallopian tube. These patients also have a higher rate of ectopic pregnancies and miscarriage, as well as preterm deliveries when they succeed in getting pregnant . With regards to imaging techniques, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) seems to be the gold standard for the diagnosis of Müllerian abnormalities, although three-dimensional sonography is able to achieve comparable results [2, 3, 5]. We performed both techniques for the diagnosis of this patient. These techniques provided us with a detailed structure of the anatomical anomaly, allowing us to plan the surgical procedure in advance.
The surgical technique of choice has to be adapted to the type of malformation. In the case of a rudimentary uterine horn firmly joined to a unicornuate uterus, some details need to be kept in mind: First, there is not a well-defined limit between the unicornuate uterus and the rudimentary horn in some cases, which means the surgeon must proceed with extreme caution. Hysteroscopic transillumination can be useful in such a case, since opening the uterine cavity may affect future reproduction . Second, the Fallopian tube on the side of the rudimentary horn must be removed in order to avoid tubal pregnancies . Finally, it is important to consider that the ipsilateral ureter is closer to the uterine body, with a higher risk of lesion during rudimentary horn removal, and should be identified before the dissection . Thus, we first removed the Fallopian tube with the hematosalpinx to have better access to the rudimentary horn. Subsequently, a careful dissection of the rudimentary horn was carried out with the precautions previously described. Finally, we sutured the myometrium in multiple layers and then the visceral peritoneum. No hysteroscopy was used in our patient.
Our report demonstrates the superior performance of laparoscopy for the treatment of IIb Müllerian abnormalies. Laparoscopy resulted in anatomical and reproductive results equivalent to those offered by a laparotomic approach, but with the additional advantages of minimally invasive surgery, that is less scarring and a shorter postoperative period, which are essential for very young patients.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's mother for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Atmaca R, Germen AT, Burak F, Kafkasli A: Acute abdomen in a case with noncommunicating rudimentary horn and unicornuate uterus. JSLS. 2005, 9: 235-237.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fedele L, Bianchi S, Zanconato G: Laparoscopic removal of the cavitated noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn: surgical aspects in 10 cases. Fertil Steril. 2005, 83: 432-436. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.07.966.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Falcone T, Gidwani G, Paraiso M: Anatomical variation in the rudimentary horns of a unicornuate uterus: implications for laparoscopic surgery. Hum Reprod. 1997, 12: 263-265. 10.1093/humrep/12.2.263.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chang CY, Chang SY, Changchien CC: Hematometra of the rudimentary horn of a unicornuate uterus resulting from cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001, 185: 1263-1264. 10.1067/mob.2001.116684.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perrotin F, Bertrand J, Body G: Laparoscopic surgery of unicornuate uterus with rudimentary uterine horn. Hum Reprod. 1999, 14: 931-933. 10.1093/humrep/14.4.931.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.