Open Access

Case reports: A helping hand to generalists

Journal of Medical Case Reports20082:311

https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-2-311

Received: 23 September 2008

Accepted: 26 September 2008

Published: 26 September 2008

Abstract

Clinical decision making can be challenging for both generalists and specialists. Case reports may assist the decision making process either by providing guidance to generalists on identifying rarer conditions or a searchable database for looking up seemingly disparate symptoms. This editorial highlights the innovations being implemented by Journal of Medical Case Reports and Cases Journal in developing an educational resource to help clinicians in decision-making.

If you are a generalist (in general practice/family medicine in my case) you will see a great number of patients with a wide range of symptoms. Even if you are not, throughout your career you are likely to see patients with conditions outside of your area of expertise. In many cases, their symptoms will add up to what we would recognise as a 'medical' condition, but in up to 19% they are vague, non-specific and/or contradictory and the management of patients with such undefined symptoms can pose a daunting challenge [1]. One of the big fears with such patients is that we are missing something, and dealing with undefined symptoms can be unsettling. We will all have our own ways of dealing with patients with such symptoms and one of the avenues open to us all is to use time [2]. Time may allow the symptoms to 'mature' and evolve into a more recognisable pattern, thus allowing us to clinch the diagnosis. Time also allows us to (for example) look things up and this is where I feel Journal of Medical Case Reports (JMCR) and Cases Journal may provide a helping hand to the generalist.

No generalist can ever expect to know everything about every condition. The research evidence clearly shows that doctors are 'good' at dealing with conditions they treat on a regular basis and potentially over-diagnose those that they have seen recently [3]. One of the key skills is in these circumstance is in knowing when and where to look things up [4].

For the rarer conditions that clinicians dread missing, many may find that JMCR provides a useful resource that highlights key learning points for generalists. The team at JMCR are working on ways for authors who publish in the journal not only to highlight that a case they report might be of interest to generalists, but also to provide key pointers on how the condition they report on might be picked up by generalists.

When clinicians are faced with a set of seemingly puzzling symptoms, then a search of the forthcoming JMCR and Cases Journal database of cases may help to provide an answer. One of the best features of this database will be that, unlike a textbook, it is updated on a very regular basis through the constant stream of submissions from around the world of cases with educational value. As such, it forms an up-to-date database that will allow clinicians access the latest information.

More importantly this database will be made up of 'real' medical cases and so unlike a textbook the history, signs, investigatory results, treatment and outcome(s) described are neither an approximation nor an 'on average' summation of a condition. In other words, learning can take place from authentic cases and not artificial 'archetypal' ones.

At present, specialists contribute the vast majority of the cases to both JMCR and Cases Journal. This likely reflects the different ethos and professional development requirements between specialist and generalists. The publication of rare or unusual medical cases might intuitively seem to be the domain and responsibility of specialist (or even sub-specialists) as such cases may describe a new condition and so help to advance our knowledge [5]. But two points are worth making here; firstly that the first clinician to see a 'rare' or novel condition may well be a generalist (something which is most likely in health care systems that have a strong and established primary care system). Secondly, we all have a responsibility to add to the medical corpus of knowledge that will further help us to care for the patients we care for.

So the next time you see a patient, ask yourself this question, "Is there anything I have learnt from this consultation that might help my fellow clinicians?" If the answer is yes, you might well have the seeds of an interesting case report and the chance to make a difference by adding to our knowledge base and improving patient care.

You can find out more on how to contribute to the journals by reading the journals' instructions for authors, at http://www.jmedicalcasereports.com/info/instructions/ and http://www.casesjournal.com/info/instructions/. To stay up to date with the case reports published in these journals, why not sign up for our regular email alerts? You can do so for JMCR online at http://jmedicalcasereports.com/alerts/ and for Cases Journal at http://casesjournal.com/alerts/. You can search JMCR's growing archive of case reports online at http://www.jmedicalcasereports.com/search.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Elizabeth Slade, Michael Kidd and the peer-reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

No specific funding was provided for this editorial. GW is funded as a Walport Clinical Lecturer by the United Kingdom's Department of Health (via University College London).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Walport Clinical Lecturer and GP Principal, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London Medical School

References

  1. Peveler R, Kilkenny L, Kinmouth A-L: Medically unexplained physical symptoms in primary care: A comparison of self-report screening questionnaires and clinical opinion. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1997, 42 (3): 245-252. 10.1016/S0022-3999(96)00292-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. O'Flynn N, Ridsdale L: Headache in primary care: how important is diagnosis to management?. British Journal of General Practice. 2002, 52 (480): 569-573.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Sox H, Blatt M, Higgins M, Marton K: Medical Decision Making. 2007, Philadelphia: ACP PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Fraser S, Greenhalgh T: Coping with complexity: educating for capability. BMJ. 2001, 323 (7316): 799-803. 10.1136/bmj.323.7316.799.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Mahajan R, Hunter J: Volume 100: Case reports: should they be confined to the dustbin?. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2008, 100 (6): 744-746. 10.1093/bja/aen128.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Wong; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement