- Case report
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Biliary peritonitis caused by a leaking T-tube fistula disconnected at the point of contact with the anterior abdominal wall: a case report
© Nikolić et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
- Received: 27 March 2008
- Accepted: 16 September 2008
- Published: 16 September 2008
Operations on the common bile duct may lead to potentially serious complications such as biliary peritonitis. T-tube insertion is performed to reduce the risk of this occurring postoperatively. Biliary leakage at the point of insertion into the common bile duct, or along the fistula, can sometimes occur after T-tube removal and this has been reported extensively in the literature. We report a case where the site at which the T-tube fistula leaked proved to be the point of contact between the fistula and the anterior abdominal wall, a previously unreported complication.
A 36-year-old sub-Saharan African woman presented with gallstone-induced pancreatitis and, once her symptoms settled, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed, common bile duct stones were removed and a T-tube was inserted. Three weeks later, T-tube removal led to biliary peritonitis due to the disconnection of the T-tube fistula which was recannulated laparoscopically using a Latex drain.
This case highlights a previously unreported mechanism for bile leak following T-tube removal caused by detachment of a fistula tract at its contact point with the anterior abdominal wall. Hepatobiliary surgeons should be aware of this mechanism of biliary leakage and the use of laparoscopy to recannulate the fistula.
- Common Bile Duct
- Bile Leak
- Anterior Abdominal Wall
- Biliary Leakage
- Common Bile Duct Exploration
The placement of a T-tube to drain the biliary system is a widely used alternative to primary closure of choledochotomy following Common Bile Duct (CBD) exploration, especially in a non-dilated system. T-tubes are used to ensure decompression of the biliary tree by creating a fibrous fistula to the anterior abdominal wall. This permits healing of the choledochotomy incision and reduces the risk of bile leak and stricture formation [1, 2]. A small bile discharge from the dermal ostium of the fistula may still be observed but usually stops within 24 hours after removal of the tube without causing biliary peritonitis . As long as there is no distal CBD obstruction, normal intra-abdominal pressure will cause compression and obliteration of the fistula lumen. We describe a case where the fistula tract failed to adhere to the anterior abdominal wall, causing a leak after removal of the T-tube.
A 36-year-old sub-Saharan African woman presented to the Accident and Emergency department with a 7-hour history of vomiting and central abdominal pain radiating to the back. There were no respiratory, cardiovascular or urinary symptoms, and past medical history was unremarkable. The blood results included an amylase of 3070 U/litre and an abdominal ultrasound showed multiple tiny gallstones confined to a thin-walled gallbladder with normal pancreas, liver, kidneys and spleen. A diagnosis of gallstone-induced pancreatitis was made and laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed 5 days later, once her symptoms had settled. An on-table cholangiogram demonstrated a filling defect at the distal end of the CBD with no duodenal filling. Laparoscopic CBD exploration was undertaken and two stones were removed from the distal CBD using a Dormia basket through the choledochoscope. A Latex 12-Fr T-tube was inserted into the CBD at the end of the procedure. The patient made an uneventful recovery postoperatively and was discharged with the T-tube spigotted and left in situ.
Biliary peritonitis is regarded as a rare but serious complication of elective T-tube removal after CBD exploration. Incidence reported in the literature varies from 0.8 to 5% in elective removal of T-tubes, rising to 24% in cases of liver transplants .
Historically, a latex T-tube has always been used during open exploration, specifically to encourage a vigorous inflammatory reaction around it causing formation of a biliary fistula. This makes T-tube removal much safer by reducing the potential for intraperitoneal bile leak. The fistula closes rapidly after removal of the T-tube as long as there is no distal CBD obstruction. More recently, silicone-coated or polyethylene T-tubes have become available, but these are less irritant and the resulting fistula tends to be less mature, increasing the risk of a leak after T-tube removal. We do not recommend use of these newer T-tubes after CBD exploration unless the patient has a latex allergy.
This case is novel since the site of the bile leak was distal, at the point of contact between fistula and anterior abdominal wall. Usually biliary leakage occurs through lack of complete fibrous T-tube fistula formation or through proximal fistula disruption during the removal process . Identification of the location of the leak as described was important for three reasons: first, it provided an accurate diagnosis; second, it confirmed that the usual leak point (i.e. the junction between fistula and CBD) was intact and did not therefore require a further T-tube placement, and third, it allowed a simple therapeutic manoeuvre by re-intubating the fistula opening.
It may be suggested that the fistula was disrupted from the abdominal wall during insufflation at the time of laparoscopy. However, this does not explain the clinical presentation before laparoscopy. We knew there was no leak before T-tube removal because of a normal T-tube cholangiogram and lack of abdominal symptoms. The patient suffered upper abdominal pain soon after removal of the T-tube, developing biliary peritonitis along with raised inflammatory markers (white cell count and C-reactive protein). This indicates a leak at the time of T-tube removal which was subsequently confirmed at laparoscopy with a pool of bile on the surface of the abdominal viscera. Bile was clearly observed emanating directly from the distal fistula opening.
The literature has been reviewed in view of factors which affect the risk of biliary leakage.
T-tubes versus choledochorrhaphy
The first option is to avoid T-tube insertion altogether and perform a choledochorrhaphy (primary closure of the choledochotomy). In the past, this was rarely advised as it was thought to increase the risk of stricture formation and prevent postoperative CBD decompression. However, research has recently suggested that primary closure may be as safe as T-tube usage , although it should be avoided if the CBD is not significantly dilated. The other benefit of T-tubes is the ease of postoperative visualisation of retained CBD stones (T-tube cholangiogram).
Duration of T-tube insertion
Many factors may affect the risk of symptomatic bile leakage following T-tube removal. Ellis  originally suggested that T-tubes should be removed 10 days after operation. It has been suggested that leaving T-tubes in situ for longer periods allows maturation of the temporary biliary cutaneous fistula, thus potentially reducing the risk of leakage . However, there is no experimental evidence to prove this hypothesis. Indeed, one study has shown that leaving T-tubes in situ for longer periods, such as 1 month postoperatively does not provide protection against increased rates of bile leakage . In this case, the T-tube was removed after 3 weeks, in line with common practice in the UK.
Experimental evidence demonstrates that the material used for manufacturing T-tubes affects the quality of fibrous fistula formed [6, 7]. This finding is supported by clinical evidence that polyvinyl chloride (PVC) or hypoallergenic latex T-tubes (such as those coated with silicon) increase rates of biliary peritonitis compared to red rubber or normal latex T-tubes, as the former take longer to form a mature tract . In our case, therefore, the standard latex T-tube used is unlikely to be of aetiological significance.
The hypothesis that an increased inflammatory response leads to the formation of a stronger fistulous tract may explain the increased rates of symptomatic bile leaks in immunocompromised patients, such as those undergoing liver transplantation . In our case, there was no past medical history of diabetes or steroid use and no medical evidence of occult immunosuppressive pathologies, although an HIV test was not performed.
T-tube removal technique
Goodwin et al.  reported a significant reduction in bile leakage and subsequent biliary peritonitis after T-tube removal in liver transplant patients when the tube was removed along a wire (Seldinger method). This technique is generally only recommended in high-risk patients in whom bile leakage is anticipated following T-tube removal, especially in immunocompromised patients following liver transplantation.
This case and our review of the literature highlight a previously unreported mechanism for bile leak following T-tube removal caused by dehiscence of a fistula tract at its contact point with the anterior abdominal wall. Hepatobiliary surgeons should be aware of this mechanism of biliary leakage and the use of laparoscopy to recannulate the fistula with a satisfactory outcome.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Wills VL, Gibson K, Karihaloot C, Jorgensen JO: Complications of biliary T-tubes after choledochotomy. ANZ J Surg. 2002, 72 (3): 177-180. 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02308.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ellis H: Choledocholithiasis. Maingot's Abdominal Operations. Edited by: Schwartz S, Ellis H. 1985, Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1883-1907.Google Scholar
- Lazaridis C, Papaziogas B, Patsas A, Galanis I, Paraskevas G, Argiriadou H, Papaziogas T: Detection of tract formation for prevention of bile peritonitis after T-tube removal. Case report. Acta Chir Belg. 2005, 105 (2): 210-212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maghsoudi H, Garadaghi A, Jafary GA: Biliary peritonitis requiring reoperation after removal of T-tubes from the common bile duct. Am J Surg. 2005, 190 (3): 430-433. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.04.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gurusamy KS, Samraj K: Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after open common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, 1Google Scholar
- Koivusalo A, Eskelinen M, Wolff H, Talva M, Mäkisalo H: Development of T-tube tracts in piglets: effect of insertion method and material of T-tubes. Res Exp Med (Berl). 1997, 197 (1): 53-56. 10.1007/s004330050055.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Apalakis A: An experimental evaluation of the types of material used for bile duct drainage tubes. Br J Surg. 1976, 63 (6): 440-445. 10.1002/bjs.1800630608.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Winstone NE, Golby MG, Lawson LJ, Windsor CW: Biliary peritonitis: a hazard of polyvinyl chloride T-tubes. Lancet. 1965, 1: 843-844. 10.1016/S0140-6736(65)91376-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sakorafas GH, Stafyla V, Tsiotos GG: Biliary peritonitis due to fistulous tract rupture following a T-tube removal. N Z Med J. 2005, 118 (1217): U1522-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goodwin SC, Bittner CA, Patel MC, Noronha MA, Chao K, Sayre JW: Technique for reduction of bile peritonitis after T-tube removal in liver transplant patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1998, 9: 986-990. 10.1016/S1051-0443(98)70437-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.