Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
22 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
4 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Mehrangiz Hatami |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
4 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
5 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Mehrangiz Hatami |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
5 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
5 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Mehrangiz Hatami |
8 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Donahoe |
8 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bharat Ved Prakash |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
5 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
14 Jul 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Mehrangiz Hatami |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
14 Jul 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
22 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bharat Ved Prakash |
26 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Donahoe |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 10 | |
Publishing | ||
22 May 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
29 Jul 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1752-1947-8-263 |
You can find further information about peer review here.