Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
1 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
4 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - PETER SZKUP |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
4 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
28 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Irene Asouhidou |
4 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Boyle |
22 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - PETER SZKUP |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
22 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
4 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - PETER SZKUP |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
4 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
2 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Irene Asouhidou |
3 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Boyle |
30 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - PETER SZKUP |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
30 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
31 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - PETER SZKUP |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
31 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
3 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - PETER SZKUP |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
3 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
9 Mar 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
9 Mar 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1752-1947-6-82 |
You can find further information about peer review here.