Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
23 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
27 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Eduardo Luis De Vito |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
27 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
10 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Bach |
13 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Georgios Kouliatsis |
15 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paschalis Steiropoulos |
20 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Miguel Goncalves |
3 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Eduardo Luis De Vito |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
3 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
21 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Eduardo Luis De Vito |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
21 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
31 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Eduardo Luis De Vito |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
31 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
15 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Eduardo Luis De Vito |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
15 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
1 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Eduardo Luis De Vito |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
1 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
30 Jan 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
30 Jan 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1752-1947-6-42 |
You can find further information about peer review here.