Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
1 May 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
1 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Amélie CHATRIAN |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
1 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
8 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Amélie CHATRIAN |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
8 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
14 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Levent Tutuncu |
21 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - mustafa kara |
22 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ulun Ulug |
27 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Amélie CHATRIAN |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
27 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
30 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Amélie CHATRIAN |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
30 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
3 Oct 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
22 Nov 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1752-1947-6-395 |
You can find further information about peer review here.