Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
22 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
29 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Ekart |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
29 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
25 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dwarakanathan Ranganathan |
23 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - alessandra palmisano |
11 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Ekart |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
11 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
24 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - alessandra palmisano |
27 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dwarakanathan Ranganathan |
31 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Ekart |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
31 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
4 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Ekart |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
4 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
11 Aug 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
18 Sep 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1752-1947-6-309 |
You can find further information about peer review here.