Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
26 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
28 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - E.M. Manoj |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
28 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
17 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - E.M. Manoj |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
17 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
3 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Teresa Ferrari |
8 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ian Clifton |
9 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - E.M. Manoj |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
9 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
19 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - E.M. Manoj |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
19 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
12 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - E.M. Manoj |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
12 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
12 Jul 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
12 Jul 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1752-1947-6-195 |
You can find further information about peer review here.