Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
5 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - ahmad separham |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
5 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
22 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - ahmad separham |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
22 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
26 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - ahmad separham |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
26 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
26 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - ahmad separham |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
26 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
25 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jagdish Butany |
11 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Katerina Linhartova |
21 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - ahmad separham |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
21 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
28 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - ahmad separham |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
28 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
16 Jan 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
16 Jan 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1752-1947-6-12 |
You can find further information about peer review here.