Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 18 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Maximilian J Hartel |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 18 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 25 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Haymo Thiel |
| 7 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vijayakumar Javalkar |
| 8 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Wuerz |
| 12 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Maximilian J Hartel |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 12 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 13 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Haymo Thiel |
| 19 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Wuerz |
| 29 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vijayakumar Javalkar |
| 12 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Maximilian J Hartel |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 12 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 25 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Maximilian J Hartel |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 25 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 2 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Maximilian J Hartel |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 2 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 27 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 27 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1752-1947-5-529 |
You can find further information about peer review here.