Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 Oct 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 2 Nov 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - KUMAR PERIASAMY |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 2 Nov 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 13 Nov 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - KUMAR PERIASAMY |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 13 Nov 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 23 Nov 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Carmont |
| 26 Nov 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francesco Oliva |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 24 Dec 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - KUMAR PERIASAMY |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 24 Dec 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 28 Jan 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - KUMAR PERIASAMY |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 28 Jan 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 6 Feb 2008 | Editorially accepted | |
| 6 Feb 2008 | Article published | 10.1186/1752-1947-2-38 |
You can find further information about peer review here.