Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13 May 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 2 Jun 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Timothy de Klerk |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 2 Jun 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 23 Jul 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Timothy de Klerk |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 23 Jul 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 30 Sep 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Timothy de Klerk |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 30 Sep 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 17 Dec 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Noel Horgan |
| 23 Jan 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nathan Radcliffe |
| 6 Feb 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Timothy de Klerk |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 6 Feb 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
| Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
| 8 May 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Timothy de Klerk |
| Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
| 8 May 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
| Publishing | ||
| 29 May 2008 | Editorially accepted | |
| 29 May 2008 | Article published | 10.1186/1752-1947-2-182 |
You can find further information about peer review here.