Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Aug 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
3 Sep 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Papadimos |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
3 Sep 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
10 Sep 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Papadimos |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
10 Sep 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
10 Sep 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Papadimos |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
10 Sep 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
12 Sep 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Papadimos |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
12 Sep 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
12 Sep 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Papadimos |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
12 Sep 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
23 Oct 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alan Taylor |
31 Jan 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jean Karl Soler |
17 Feb 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Papadimos |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
17 Feb 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
9 May 2008 | Editorially accepted | |
9 May 2008 | Article published | 10.1186/1752-1947-2-150 |
You can find further information about peer review here.