Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
16 Aug 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
17 Aug 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Kaemmer |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
17 Aug 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
7 Sep 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Kaemmer |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
7 Sep 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
11 Nov 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Darren Booi |
13 Nov 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Long |
10 Dec 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Kaemmer |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
10 Dec 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
10 Jan 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Darren Booi |
18 Feb 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Kaemmer |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
18 Feb 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
7 Mar 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Kaemmer |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
7 Mar 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
3 Apr 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Kaemmer |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
3 Apr 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
16 Apr 2008 | Editorially accepted | |
16 Apr 2008 | Article published | 10.1186/1752-1947-2-108 |
You can find further information about peer review here.