Skip to main content

Importance of cerebral angiography in the evaluation of delayed carotid stent thrombosis: a case report

Abstract

Background

While noninvasive imaging is typically used during the initial assessment of carotid artery disease, digital subtraction angiography remains the gold standard for evaluating carotid stent thrombosis and stenosis (Krawisz in Cardiol Clin 39:539–549, 2021). This case highlights the importance of digital subtraction angiography for assessing carotid artery stent patency in place of non-invasive imaging.

Case presentation

We present a 61-year-old African American male patient with a history of right cervical internal carotid artery dissection that was treated with carotid artery stenting and endovascular thrombectomy, who developed recurrent right hemispheric infarcts related to delayed carotid stent thrombosis. Digital subtraction angiography found multiple filling defects consistent with extensive in-stent thrombosis not clearly observed with magnetic resonance angiography. Etiology was likely secondary to chronic antiplatelet noncompliance. Therefore, the patient was treated medically with a heparin drip, and dual antiplatelet therapy (dAPT) was restarted. At 1-month follow-up the patient did not report new motor or sensory deficits.

Conclusion

In the setting of delayed carotid stent thrombosis secondary to antiplatelet noncompliance, digital subtraction angiography may play an essential diagnostic role for early identification and determination of the most appropriate treatment.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Carotid stent thrombosis is an exceptionally rare and potentially fatal complication after carotid artery stenting (CAS), with limited reporting in the acute setting that usually manifests as a stroke secondary to thromboembolic mechanism [1]. This complication can be suspected with the worsening of neurologic deficit and a history of medication noncompliance. The scarcity of literature regarding carotid stent thrombosis is even more pronounced in the delayed setting. Furthermore, there is currently no established definition regarding the timeframe to distinguish delayed carotid stent thrombosis (dCSTh) from acute or subacute carotid stent thrombosis. Despite the acknowledged limitations of noninvasive imaging in the acute setting, there is uncertainty regarding diagnostic imaging recommendations for dCSTh. In this context, three additional factors should be considered: the time of thrombosis, severity of new neurologic deficit, and the extension of infarcted territory [2]. Consideration of these can aid in minimizing complication events, such as future embolic stroke or hemorrhagic transformation [2]. In addition to antiplatelet resistance [1, 2] or inadequate antiplatelet treatment [3], other possible risk factors for dCSTh are heparin resistance, diabetes mellitus [1], severe plaque protrusion [4], and early stent restenosis [5].

Case presentation

A 61-year-old, right-handed African American man presented to our emergency department with acute worsening of chronic left hemiparesis. He had a history of right middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 occlusion owing to right cervical internal carotid artery dissection that was treated with endovascular thrombectomy and emergent CAS with a 4 mm × 23 mm Enterprise stent 4 years prior. At the time, he was placed on dAPT and was recommended life-long aspirin; however, he was not fully compliant in the last year. On neurological examination, he was found to have left hemibody spasticity with left arm plegia. The left leg demonstrated partial weakness with drift at 5 seconds, with 3/5 strength and 5/5 strength on the right side. Magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography of the head revealed acute infarctions in the right MCA territory involving the right temporal lobe, right parietal lobe, and right precentral gyrus, abutting extensive chronic infarct in the right MCA territory (Fig.1a and b). Time-of-flight (TOF) MRA of the head and neck (without contrast) found loss of normal flow-related signal throughout the right carotid system and MCA (Fig. 2a), a finding consistent with cervical internal carotid artery occlusion. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was pursued to better characterize the lesion (Fig. 2b), which showed multiple filling defects at the stent level in the cervical and petrous right carotid segments, consistent with extensive dCSTh (as shown in Additional file 1: Video S1). There was no evidence of intracranial large vessel occlusion. Subsequently, the patient was treated medically with heparin drip because the patient was outside the window for thrombolysis, then dAPT was restarted when the patient was discharged. At 1-month follow-up, the patient denied worsening weakness or sensory problems, with good compliance of dAPT. On examination, the left arm had spasticity without movement and the left leg had drift, but it was maintained for 5 seconds with unstable gait and limited ambulation with a walker. He was transitioned from dAPT to combined therapy with aspirin plus apixaban.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Computerized tomography of the head without contrast showing chronic right middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory infarct including an area of evolving acute/subacute left temporal and parietal lobe ischemia. Shown better on b magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing acute right MCA territory infarct involving the right temporal lobe, right parietal lobe, and right precentral gyrus

Fig. 2
figure 2

Relevant neuroimaging showcasing key imaging findings. a Right cervicocerebral angiogram with multiple filling defects at the level of the carotid stent just proximal to the petrous bone. Further filling defects extending up through the peak petrous and cavernous segments suggests thrombosis. There is antegrade flow into the middle and anterior cerebral arteries. b Absent flow signal in the right cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) system thought to be pseudo-occlusion. c Right spectral carotid Doppler analysis showing blunting of the arterial waveform consistent with nonhemodynamically significant stenosis of 1–49% in the distal internal carotid artery

Discussion

CAS has become an important treatment approach for carotid artery stenosis in recent years [6]. However, dCSTh is a rare yet serious complication, with low-end estimates ranging from 2.7%, 2.6%, and 2.4% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively [7]. While noninvasive imaging techniques, such as MRA and Computerized Tomography Angiography, are typically used to detect carotid stent thrombosis and stenosis to avoid imaging procedural risks [8], DSA is crucial for assessing the patency of the carotid artery stent.

This case emphasizes the importance of DSA as the gold standard confirmatory test for carotid stent thrombosis and stenosis because it can identify discrepancies with noninvasive imaging [9] [such as ultrasound (Fig. 2c) or MRA]. Understanding the diagnostic discrepancy between DSA and other noninvasive imaging is crucial to defining whether medical treatment, open or an endovascular approach is needed. In addition, it is important to note that DSA provides information about collateral flow, atherosclerotic features, and severity of plaque morphology [8]. By emphasizing in the presence or absence of these radiologic features along the carotid arteries, DSA offers systematic assessment of atherosclerotic and stent morphology, defining its patency, plaque characteristics, collateral circulation, and grade of intracranial atherosclerotic disease [10].

A multicenter retrospective analysis from 2018 demonstrated that with reviewing the DSA, medical or surgical decisions changed in 107 of 243 cases (47%) in the setting of carotid stenosis [9]. Nonetheless, the use of noninvasive imaging has increased due to safety and the ability to obtain high resolution images of the carotid arteries [8]. Additionally, TOF MRA is an option in patients with gadolinium contrast contraindication but is less accurate in identifying moderate-to-severe carotid stenosis [8] or partial thrombosis when compared with DSA.

Furthermore, this case highlights the importance of continued life-long antiplatelet use. Despite the scarce available data around the etiology of carotid stent thrombosis, resistance to antiplatelet therapy or discontinuation are believed to be the main causes of stent thrombosis [2], as was inferred with our patient. Inherent or acquired thrombotic disorders like essential thrombocythemia or chronic atrial fibrillation, respectively, are other less common etiologies to be considered [2].

Conclusion

dCSTh is an uncommon but serious CAS complication that should be considered in the setting of dAPT noncompliance or antiplatelet therapy resistance. Although noninvasive imaging methods are commonly employed to assess carotid artery disease, it is crucial to consistently consider DSA as it provides essential insights into stent patency, collateral blood flow, atherosclerotic characteristics, and the extent of plaque morphology [8].

Availability of data and materials

No new data were created or analyzed during this study.

Abbreviations

MCA:

Middle cerebral artery

ICA:

Internal carotid artery

CAS:

Carotid artery stenting

dAPT:

Dual antiplatelet therapy

TOF MRA:

Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiogram

dCSTh:

Delayed carotid stent thrombosis

MRA:

Magnetic resonance angiography

DSA:

Digital subtraction angiography

References

  1. Iancu A, Grosz C, Lazar A. Acute carotid stent thrombosis: review of the literature and long-term follow-up. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2010;2:110–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moulakakis KG, Mylonas SN, Lazaris A, Tsivgoulis G, Kakisis J, Sfyroeras GS, et al. Acute carotid stent thrombosis: a comprehensive review. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2016;50(7):511–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaturvedi S, Sohrab S, Tselis A. Carotid stent thrombosis: report of 2 fatal cases. Stroke. 2001;32(11):2700–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Setacci C, de Donato G, Setacci F, Chisci E, Cappelli A, Pieraccini M, et al. Surgical management of acute carotid thrombosis after carotid stenting: a report of three cases. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42(5):993–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Okazaki T, Satomi J, Satoh K, Hirasawa M, Nagahiro S. Rescue revascularization therapy with a stent-in-stent technique for acute intracranial internal carotid artery occlusion. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2005;45(5):253–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brott TG, Howard G, Roubin GS, Meschia JF, Mackey A, Brooks W, et al. Long-term results of stenting versus endarterectomy for carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(11):1021–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wholey MH, Al-Mubarek N, Wholey MH. Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry. Cathet Cardio Intervent. 2003;60(2):259–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Krawisz AK, Carroll BJ, Secemsky EA. Risk stratification and management of extracranial carotid artery disease. Cardiol Clin. 2021;39(4):539–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Felbaum DR, Maxwell C, Naydin S, Ringer A, Hanel RA, Sauvageau E, et al. Carotid stenosis: utility of diagnostic angiography. World Neurosurg. 2019;121:e962–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Adla T, Adlova R. Multimodality imaging of carotid stenosis. Int J Angiol. 2015;24(3):179–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Every author participated equally in the evaluation of clinical history and images, as well as in the creation of the manuscript and bibliographic management.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Felipe Daza-Ovalle.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

Dr. Zaki Masoud, Dr. Juan Felipe Daza-Ovalle, and Dr. Charles Esenwa have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Video S1. DSA shows multiple filling defects at the stent level in the cervical and petrous right carotid segments.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Masoud, Z., Daza-Ovalle, J.F. & Esenwa, C. Importance of cerebral angiography in the evaluation of delayed carotid stent thrombosis: a case report. J Med Case Reports 18, 109 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-024-04379-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-024-04379-5

Keywords