Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Postoperative brachial artery entrapment associated with pediatric supracondylar fracture of the humerus: a case report

  • David Latz1Email author,
  • Jan Grassmann1,
  • Erik Schiffner1,
  • Sebastian Gehrmann1,
  • Mansur Duran2,
  • Joachim Windolf1 and
  • Pascal Jungbluth1
Journal of Medical Case Reports201711:69

DOI: 10.1186/s13256-017-1240-4

Received: 10 October 2016

Accepted: 8 February 2017

Published: 14 March 2017

Abstract

Background

Severely displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children are frequently associated with complications including neurovascular injuries, non-union, or compartment syndrome. In the current literature, no report exists about postoperative brachial artery entrapment in combination with an inconspicuous preoperative neurovascular examination.

Case presentation

We present a case of a 6-year-old white boy with a pulseless radial and ulnar artery after open reduction and internal fixation of a severely displaced supracondylar fracture of his right humerus (Gartland type III) using four K-wires. Remarkably, the preoperative neurovascular examination was inconspicuous. Doppler ultrasound of his brachial artery revealed no pulse when his elbow was in flexion and a faint pulse when it was in full extension 10 hours postoperatively. Revision surgery was performed immediately. On intraoperative examination, a kinking of his brachial artery caused by an entrapment of the tunica externa in the reduced fracture was seen and the artery was released by microsurgical arteriolysis immediately. At the final follow-up examination, positive palpable pulse with good capillary filling and, according to Flynn’s criteria, an excellent recovery of elbow function was observed 3 months postoperatively.

Conclusions

This case demonstrates a rare complication of postoperative artery entrapment with inconspicuous preoperative neurovascular examination. It strongly emphasizes the need for a standardized postoperative neurovascular assessment with fully flexed as well as fully extended elbow.

Keywords

Case report Pediatric supracondylar fracture of the humerus Gartland type III Neurovascular complications Entrapment of the brachial artery Open K-wire fixation

Background

Supracondylar fractures of the humerus are common elbow fractures in children [14]. Gartland’s classification based on the degree of displacement of the distal fragment is used frequently [5]. Fractures with complete displacement of the distal fragment (Gartland type III) are frequently associated with various complications such as neurovascular injuries, non-union, or compartment syndrome that can lead to a Volkmann’s contracture or even amputation of the affected limb [3, 58]. Preoperative neurovascular assessment scores (for example, Liverpool Upper-limb Fracture Assessment) have already been proposed to optimize evaluation of children presenting with upper limb injuries in Accident and emergency (A&E) departments [9]. The following case presents a rare vascular complication despite an inconspicuous preoperative neurovascular examination and emphasizes the importance of a thorough postoperative neurovascular assessment.

Case presentation

A 6-year-old white boy presented to our A&E department after a fall on his extended right arm from a height of 1 m. An initial examination revealed a severely displaced right elbow without penetration of the skin. A physical examination was hindered by his anxiety and pain. However, according to Liverpool Upper-limb Fracture Assessment, his neurovascular examination was reported as unremarkable. Palpable radial and ulnar pulses as well as no sensorimotor deficit were obtained. Radiographs in two planes showed a posterolaterally displaced supracondylar fracture of his humerus classified as Gartland type III (Fig. 1a). Surgical efforts under general anesthesia were initiated immediately. An initial attempt of closed reduction was unsuccessful. Hence, open reduction and internal fixation using four K-wires were performed immediately (Fig. 1b). No intraoperative complications were reported. On postoperative examination, arterial pulses were palpable in elbow extension with unaffected capillary filling. His arm was immobilized in a long-arm cast with elbow flexion of 90°. Reevaluation of his arterial pulses after immobilization was not documented.
Fig. 1

Radiographs in two planes: a preoperative and b postoperative after 6 weeks

Ten hours after surgery, he complained of acute pain in his right forearm. A physical examination revealed a coldness of his right forearm with poor capillary filling and absent arterial pulses while immobilized in the long-arm cast with elbow flexed to 90°. The cast was removed and Doppler ultrasound revealed that there was no pulse while his elbow was in flexion and faint pulses with his elbow in extension. The immediately performed revision surgery (transverse arteriotomy and exploration with a Fogarty catheter) revealed no arterial thrombosis. After extending the surgical approach a kinking of his brachial artery caused by an entrapment of the tunica externa in the reduced fracture was observed (Fig. 2a). It was released with microsurgical arteriolysis (Fig. 2b). Immediately, his radial and ulnar pulses were palpable with good capillary filling.
Fig. 2

a Entrapment of the brachial artery (yellow arrow) and b after microsurgical arteriolysis

Postoperative immobilization was achieved using a long-arm cast with the elbow at 90° flexion for 6 weeks. Implant removal at 6 weeks was followed by intensive physical therapy to increase the range of motion (ROM). At the final follow-up examination at 3 months, the subjective elbow function had fully recovered. He had positive palpable pulses, a warm forearm with good capillary filling and, according to Flynn’s criteria [2, 10], an excellent recovery of elbow function as compared to the healthy contralateral side with 100 % ROM in extension/flexion 10-0-150°, pronation/supination 90-0-90°, and no loss of carrying angle were observed. Figure 3 gives an overview of the case.
Fig. 3

Timeline. A&E Accident and emergency

Discussion

Gartland type III fractures are highly correlated with primary neurovascular lesions [1114]. Posteromedial displacement is associated with radial nerve injuries, whereas posterolateral displacement is associated with median nerve injuries. Brachial artery injuries occur in both types of displacement equally [15, 16]. Typical vascular injuries are intimal tear, thrombus formation, and division or spasm of the vessel [17, 18]. The initial therapy of pediatric supracondylar fractures with an absent radial pulse and a cold white hand is closed reduction and fixation with K-wires. If the initial attempt is unsuccessful in restoring the pulse, open reduction and vascular exploration is mandated [19]. Management of children with absence of their radial pulse with a well-perfused hand is still controversial [1921]. Remarkably, no difference between early surgical treatment (8 hours or less following injury) and delayed surgical treatment (more than 8 hours following injury), with regard to the perioperative complication rates, is reported [22]. Due to serious primary neurovascular lesions and difficult physical examination in young patients, a standardized neurovascular assessment has already been proposed [9]. In the current literature, only a few reports about delayed neurovascular complications exist [2325]. In fact, an excellent clinical long-term outcome can be expected if postoperative circulatory failure is treated immediately [24]. In general, artery entrapment syndromes, for example caused by a humeral bony spur, are usually clinically unapparent and symptoms only occur with specific movements, such as extension or flexion of the elbow [26, 27]. Arguably, a thorough postoperative neurovascular assessment with fully flexed as well as fully extended elbow can detect a postoperative artery entrapment.

Conclusions

This case demonstrates a rare complication of a postoperative brachial artery entrapment despite inconspicuous preoperative neurovascular examination. This strongly emphasizes the need for a standardized postoperative neurovascular assessment in a full range of elbow motion.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Authors’ contributions

DL, JG, SG, MD, ES, JW, and particularly PJ were major contributors concerning the management of the patient, review of the articles, and manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s legal guardian for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable. The patient was examined as part of regular consultation and hospitalization.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Trauma and Hand Surgery, University Hospital
(2)
Department of Vascular Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital

References

  1. Davis RT, Gorczyca JT, Pugh K. Supracondylar humerus fractures in children. Comparison of operative treatment methods. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;376:49–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Sahu RL. Percutaneous K-wire fixation in paediatric supracondylar fractures of humerus: A retrospective study. Niger Med J. 2013;54:329–34. doi:10.4103/0300-1652.122355.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Houshian S, Mehdi B, Larsen SM. The epidemiology of elbow fracture in children: analysis of 355 fractures, with special reference to supracondylar humerus fractures. J Orthop Sci. 2001;6:312–5. doi:10.1007/s007760100024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. James D, Gajendran M, Paraseth TK. Functional and radiological correlation in surgically managed severe supracondylar humerus fracture in a pediatric cohort using pediatric outcomes data collection instrument upper extremity scale: A report from a level V trauma center in rural Central India. CHRISMED J Health Res. 2017;4:43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Alton TB, Werner SE, Gee AO. Classifications in brief: the Gartland classification of supracondylar humerus fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:738–41. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-4033-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. von Laer LR. Der radiale Fixateur externe zur Behandlung suprakondylarer Humerusfrakturen im Wachstumsalter. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 1997;9:265–76. doi:10.1007/s00064-006-0098-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Dormans JP, Squillante R, Sharf H. Acute neurovascular complications with supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1995;20:1–4. doi:10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80046-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Gosens T, Bongers KJ. Neurovascular complications and functional outcome in displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Injury. 2003;34:267–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mayne AI, Perry DC, Stables G, et al. Documentation of neurovascular status in supracondylar fractures and the development of an assessment proforma. Emerg Med J. 2013;30:480–2. doi:10.1136/emermed-2012-201293.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Flynn JC, Matthews JG, Benoit RL. Blind pinning of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Sixteen years’ experience with long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56:263–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Shaw BA, Kasser JR, Emans JB, et al. Management of vascular injuries in displaced supracondylar humerus fractures without arteriography. J Orthop Trauma. 1990;4:25–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Abbott MD, Buchler L, Loder RT, et al. Gartland type III supracondylar humerus fractures: outcome and complications as related to operative timing and pin configuration. J Child Orthop. 2014;8:473–7. doi:10.1007/s11832-014-0624-x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Rasool MN, Naidoo KS. Supracondylar fractures: posterolateral type with brachialis muscle penetration and neurovascular injury. J Pediatr Orthop. 1999;19:518–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mooney III JF, Hosseinzadeh P, Oetgen M, et al. AAOS Appropriate Use Criteria: Management of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures With Vascular Injury. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016;24:e24–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Eren A, Güven M, Erol B, et al. Correlation between posteromedial or posterolateral displacement and cubitus varus deformity in supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Child Orthop. 2008;2:85–9. doi:10.1007/s11832-008-0088-y.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Campbell CC, Waters PM, Emans JB, et al. Neurovascular injury and displacement in type III supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 1995;15:47–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mohammadzadeh MA, Mohammadzadeh M, Mohammadzadeh A, et al. Arterial damage accompanying supracondylar fractures of the humerus. Trauma Mon. 2012;16:160–3. doi:10.5812/kowsar.22517464.3273.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumar R, Trikha V, Malhotra R. A study of vascular injuries in pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2001;9:37–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Garbuz DS, Leitch K, Wright JG. The treatment of supracondylar fractures in children with an absent radial pulse. J Pediatr Orthop. 1996;16:594–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Korompilias AV, Lykissas MG, Mitsionis GI, et al. Treatment of pink pulseless hand following supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Int Orthop. 2009;33:237–41. doi:10.1007/s00264-007-0509-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Badkoobehi H, Choi PD, Bae DS, et al. Management of the pulseless pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:937–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mehlman CT, Strub WM, Roy DR, et al. The effect of surgical timing on the perioperative complications of treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A:323–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ege T, Turkkan S, Gunay C, et al. Late onset brachial artery thrombosis and total temporary peripheral neuropathy in a child with humerus supracondylar fracture: a case report. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2015;21:75–8. doi:10.5505/tjtes.2015.92072.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Reigstad O, Thorkildsen R, Grimsgaard C, et al. Supracondylar fractures with circulatory failure after reduction, pinning, and entrapment of the brachial artery: excellent results more than 1 year after open exploration and revascularization. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25:26–30. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181db276a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pandey K, Maravi L, Turkar R. Management of postoperative vascular compromise in supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children. Orthop J MP Chapter. 2015;21(2):70.Google Scholar
  26. Meda N, Verma H, Tripathi RK. Ischemic brachial artery entrapment syndrome by supracondylar humeral bony spur. J Vasc Surg Cases. 2015;1:116–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Halha H, Enon B, Chevalier J-M, et al. Brachial artery entrapment: Compression by the supracondylar process. Ann Vasc Surg. 1987;1:479–82. doi:10.1007/bf02732675.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement