Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Osteoid osteoma of a metacarpal bone: A case report and review of the literature

  • Efstathios Chronopoulos1,
  • Fragiskos N Xypnitos1,
  • Vassilios S Nikolaou1Email author,
  • Nicolas Efstathopoulos1 and
  • Dimitrios Korres1
Journal of Medical Case Reports20082:285

DOI: 10.1186/1752-1947-2-285

Received: 01 January 2008

Accepted: 27 August 2008

Published: 27 August 2008

Abstract

Introduction

Osteoid osteoma is a benign tumor of the growing skeleton. It presents with pain, which is usually worse at night. The radiographic features consist of a central oval or round nidus surrounded first by a radiolucent area followed by another area of sclerotic bone. In the hand, osteoid osteoma is more commonly located in the phalanges and carpal bones. The metacarpals are the least common sites for osteoid osteoma.

Case presentation

We present a case of an osteoid osteoma of the left third metacarpal bone in a 36-year-old woman. The clinical and radiographic findings along with the surgical management of the lesion are presented. The pain disappeared immediately after the operation. At the 2-year follow-up, the patient was pain-free and there was no evidence of recurrence.

Conclusion

Physicians should be aware of the unusual presence and the atypical clinical presentation of this benign lesion in the metacarpal bones of the hand.

Introduction

Osteoid osteoma is a benign bone tumor of the growing skeleton representing approximately 10% of all benign bone neoplasias [1]. It usually affects children and young adults [1]. Heine in 1927 [2], Bergstrand in 1930 [3], and Jaffe in 1935 [4] identified osteoid osteoma as a clinical entity. Pain is often the only symptom of the disease and is typically described as mild and intermittent at first, becoming more constant and severe at night [5]. When the lesions appear in the hand, diagnosis is challenging for three reasons: first, the typical pain pattern may be absent; second, lesions in the hand may have unusual clinical signs and radiographic presentations; and third, histologic features may differ from classic osteoid osteomas, which occur in the long bones [6]. The metacarpals in particular are not a common site for osteoid osteoma and the diagnosis is often missed in the initial examination. We report a case of an osteoid osteoma in the third metacarpal, and describe the clinical presentation, radiological findings and successful outcome after surgical excision of the lesion.

Case presentation

A 36-year-old woman was referred to our clinic in May 2005 with a 1-year history of pain in her left hand. The pain was constant but increased at night and after manual labor, and was reduced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. There was no history of injury.

There was a tender swelling of the head of the third metacarpal bone in the dorsum of the left hand at physical examination. The range of motion was not limited and there were no sensory disturbances. The grip strength of the left hand was slightly reduced, mainly due to pain.

Blood count and biochemical profile were within the reference ranges. The radiograph showed an oval nidus surrounded by a radiolucent ring (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Plain radiography of the left hand. A small, oval, radiolucent lesion partially surrounded by sclerotic bone (left). No signs of recurrence at the 2-year follow-up (right).

Computed tomography (CT) of the left hand clearly showed an oval radiolucent zone at the head of the third metacarpal bone and marked sclerosis around the lesion (Fig. 2). The history and clinical and radiographic findings pointed to the diagnosis of an osteoid osteoma of the head of the third metacarpal bone in the left hand. The patient was operated on 30 days later, by a dorsal approach (Fig. 3a), under a brachial plexus block. An en bloc excision of the nidus was performed using a small curette. A high-speed burr was also used to remove the sclerotic bone inside the lesion (Fig. 3b). The defect was filled with an autogenous cancellous bone graft (Fig. 3c). The hand was immobilized postoperatively with a splint.
Figure 2

Computed tomography showing the radiolucent zone and the marked sclerosis around the lesion (arrow).

Figure 3

Surgical procedure. (a) Dorsal approach at the third metacarpal head. (b) Resection of the dorsal sclerotic bone. (c) The defect filled with an autogenous cancellous bone graft.

Histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma. The pain disappeared immediately after the operation. At the 2-year follow-up, the patient was pain-free and there was no evidence of recurrence (Fig. 1).

Discussion

Osteoid osteoma is a benign bone tumor of the growing skeleton representing approximately 10% of all benign bone neoplasias. It usually affects children and young adults. Normally the tumor does not exceed 1 cm in diameter [7]. The radiographic characteristic of osteoid osteoma is the central nidus, a 2 to 10 mm focus of osteoid nested in a more radiolucent fibrous stroma, surrounded by marginal sclerosis.

Osteoid osteoma usually occurs in the second and third decade of life. Male patients are more often affected than female patients by a ratio of 2:1, and the tumor is rare in the African-American population. It has a predilection for the lower extremity, with half or more of the lesions occurring in the femur and tibia, near the end of the shaft. Of the remaining lesions, approximately 30% are equally distributed among the spine, hand and foot [8].

Localization in the hand occurs with an incidence of only about 8% of all reported cases. Nevertheless, osteoid osteoma of the hand is well described in the literature. Allieu and Lussiez [9] and Ambrosia et al. [10] reported the largest series of hand osteoid osteomas. The phalanges are the most frequent sites for osteoid osteoma in the hand [1113], followed by the carpal bones. The metacarpals are the least common sites for osteoid osteoma [1416].

Trauma has been considered to be a contributing factor, although for others the correlation between injury and the onset of osteoid osteoma remains unclear [11]. Carroll [11] asserted that there is no direct correlation between them, but many cases have been reported in which an injury precedes the onset of the lesion. Kendrick and Evarts [17] reported that 15 out of their 36 cases had had an episode of initial trauma, and the incidence reported by Bednar et al. [18] was 11 out of 46 cases. Baron et al. [19] described 15 patients with post-traumatic osteoid osteoma. Uda et al. [14] reported a case of an osteoid osteoma of the metacarpal bone presenting after an injury.

Clinically, patients usually present with pain and swelling. The pain, which occurs in about 80% of patients, is more severe at night and is often relieved with salicylates or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents that inhibit the production of prostaglandins by the lesion [20]. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the intensity of pain. Nerve endings might be stimulated by the high pressure owing to the increased blood flow within the tumor [21]. Nerve fibers, which are presumed to be components of the autonomic nervous system, are identified in the fibrous zone around the nidus [22]. Prostaglandins may directly stimulate free nerve endings inside or close to the tumor by lowering the nociceptive threshold [23]. A painless osteoid osteoma in a metacarpal has been reported by Basu et al. [15], nevertheless, all other metacarpal osteoid osteomas reported to date have presented with pain [7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 23], as in our patient.

The diagnosis of an osteoid osteoma in the metacarpals may be difficult and is usually based on clinical and radiographic findings. Conventional radiographs can show the nidus as a small lytic spot surrounded by a radiolucent ring. However, about a quarter of osteoid osteomas are not detected on plain radiographs alone. In such cases, CT, bone scintigraphy, magnetic resonance imaging and angiography are useful in making the correct diagnosis [20]. Surgical treatment including excision of the nidus is usually curative [7], and is the treatment of choice. Recently, minimally invasive techniques, such as percutaneous trephine or drill resection [24, 25], with or without the subsequent injection of ethanol [26, 27] and thermal destruction with laser photocoagulation [28] or radiofrequency ablation [29], have been used for the removal or destruction of the nidus.

Recurrence of an osteoid osteoma is likely due to incomplete excision [30, 31]. Usually, such recurrences have been recorded after curettage or drilling and rarely after an en bloc excision. Carroll [11] has stressed the need for careful radiological and microscopic control at the time of operation. Patients may experience a symptom-free interval after unsuccessful surgery. Recurrence of symptoms may indicate the presence of a second osteoid osteoma. Although such cases are rare, lesions with as many as three distinct nidi have been reported [32]. Most recurrences occur in the first 7 months after primary treatment [33] and have been associated with a nidus diameter of 1.0 to 1.5 cm [34].

Conclusion

Osteoid osteomas of the hand are challenging to diagnose for several reasons. First, the typical pain pattern may be absent. Second, lesions in the hand may have unusual clinical signs and radiographic presentations. Third, histologic features may differ from classic osteoid osteomas, which occur in the long bones.

Osteoid osteomas of the metacarpal bones, although unusual, should be considered in the differential diagnosis of chronic pain in the hand of a young patient, presenting with or without a history of previous injury.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Abbreviations

CT: 

Computed tomography.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
2nd Orthopedic Department, Konstantopoulion Hospital, Athens University

References

  1. Resnick D, Niwayama G: Tumors and tumor like diseases. Diagnosis of Bone Joint Disorders. 1988, Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 3621-3635.Google Scholar
  2. Heine J: Einheilender Knochensequester und der Grundphalanx des Ringfingers. Arch Klin Chir. 1927, 146: 737-Google Scholar
  3. Bergstrand H: Über eine eigenartige, wahrscheinlich bisher nicht beschriebene osteoblastische Krankheit in den langen Knochen der Hand und des Fusses. Acta Radiol. 1930, 11: 596-10.3109/00016923009132949.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Jaffe H: A benign osteoblastic tumor composed of osteoid and atypical bone. Arch Surg. 1935, 709-Google Scholar
  5. Greenspan A: Benign bone-forming lesions: osteoma, osteoid osteoma, and osteoblastoma. Clinical, imaging, pathologic, and differential considerations. Skeletal Radiol. 1993, 22: 485-500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Burger IM, McCarthy EF: Phalangeal osteoid osteomas in the hand: a diagnostic problem. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004, 427: 198-203. 10.1097/01.blo.0000142623.97901.39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. De Smet L, Fabry G: Osteoid osteoma of the hand and carpus: peculiar presentations and imaging. Acta Orthop Belg. 1995, 61: 113-116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kransdorf MJ, Stull MA, Gilkey FW, Moser RP: Osteoid osteoma. Radiographics. 1991, 11: 671-696.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Allieu Y, Lussiez B: Osteoid osteoma of the hand. Apropos of 46 cases. Ann Chir Main. 1988, 7: 298-304. 10.1016/S0753-9053(88)80026-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ambrosia JM, Wold LE, Amadio PC: Osteoid osteoma of the hand and wrist. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1987, 12: 794-800.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Carroll RE: Osteoid osteoma in the hand. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1953, 35A: 888-893.Google Scholar
  12. Muren C, Hoglund M, Engkvist O, Juhlin L: Osteoid osteomas of the hand. Report of three cases and review of the literature. Acta Radiol. 1991, 32: 62-66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Wachtl SW, Exner GU, von Hochstetter A, Sennwald G: Osteoid osteoma of the hand. Case representation with special reference to magnetic resonance tomography and literature review. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1995, 133: 76-78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Uda H, Mizuzeki T, Tsuge K: Osteoid osteoma of the metacarpal bone presenting after an injury. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2002, 36: 238-242. 10.1080/02844310260259932.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Basu S, Basu P, Dowell JK: Painless osteoid osteoma in a metacarpal. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1999, 24: 133-134.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kallio E: Osteoid osteoma of the metacarpal and metatarsal bones. Acta Orthop Scand. 1963, 33: 246-252.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kendrick JI, Evarts CM: Osteoid-osteoma: a critical analysis of 40 tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1967, 54: 51-59. 10.1097/00003086-196709000-00007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bednar MS, McCormack RR, Glasser D, Weiland AJ: Osteoid osteoma of the upper extremity. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1993, 18: 1019-1025. 10.1016/0363-5023(93)90395-J.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Baron D, Soulier C, Kermabon C, Leroy JP, Le Goff P: Post-traumatic osteoid osteoma. Apropos of 2 cases and review of the literature. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic. 1992, 59: 271-275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Healey JH, Ghelman B: Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma. Current concepts and recent advances. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986, 204: 76-85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Golding JS: The natural history of osteoid osteoma; with a report of twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1954, 36B (2): 218-229.Google Scholar
  22. Sherman MS, McFarland G: Mechanism of pain in osteoid osteomas. South Med J. 1965, 58: 163-166.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Greco F, Tamburrelli F, Ciabattoni G: Prostaglandins in osteoid osteoma. Int Orthop. 1991, 15: 35-37. 10.1007/BF00210531.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Towbin R, Kaye R, Meza MP, Pollock AN, Yaw K, Moreland M: Osteoid osteoma: percutaneous excision using a CT-guided coaxial technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995, 164: 945-949.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ward WG, Eckardt JJ, Shayestehfar S, Mirra J, Grogan T, Oppenheim W: Osteoid osteoma diagnosis and management with low morbidity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993, 291: 229-235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Adam G, Neuerburg J, Vorwerk D, Forst J, Gunther RW: Percutaneous treatment of osteoid osteomas: combination of drill biopsy and subsequent ethanol injection. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 1997, 1: 281-284.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Duda SH, Schnatterbeck P, Harer T, Giehl J, Bohm P, Claussen CD: Treatment of osteoid osteoma with CT-guided drilling and ethanol instillation. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1997, 122: 507-510.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gangi A, Dietemann JL, Guth S, Vinclair L, Sibilia J, Mortazavi R, Steib JP, Roy C: Percutaneous laser photocoagulation of spinal osteoid osteomas under CT guidance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998, 19: 1955-1958.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. de Berg JC, Pattynama PM, Obermann WR, Bode PJ, Vielvoye GJ, Taminiau AH: Percutaneous computed-tomography-guided thermocoagulation for osteoid osteomas. Lancet. 1995, 346: 350-351. 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92228-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Norman A: Persistence or recurrence of pain: a sign of surgical failure is osteoid-osteoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978, 130: 263-266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Voto SJ, Cook AJ, Weiner DS, Ewing JW, Arrington LE: Treatment of osteoid osteoma by computed tomography guided excision in the pediatric patient. J Pediatr Orthop. 1990, 10: 510-513.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Glynn JJ, Lichtenstein L: Osteoid-osteoma with multicentric nidus. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973, 55: 855-858.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Vanderschueren GM, Taminiau AH, Obermann WR, Bloem JL: Osteoid osteoma: clinical results with thermocoagulation. Radiology. 2002, 224: 82-86. 10.1148/radiol.2241011135.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lindner NJ, Ozaki T, Roedl R, Gosheger G, Winkelmann W, Wortler K: Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in osteoid osteoma. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001, 83: 391-396. 10.1302/0301-620X.83B3.11679.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Chronopoulos et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.