Skip to main content

An uncommon encounter: crossed fused renal ectopia with singular ureter: a case report

Abstract

Background

Crossed fused renal ectopia (CFRE) is a common congenital anomaly where one kidney is positioned abnormally on the opposite side of the midline, often fused with the other kidney. However, single ureter draining crossed fused renal ectopia is a rare occurrence.

Case report

Here, we report a case of crossed fused renal ectopia with a single ureter in a 46-year-old Nepali male who presented with history of lithuria. Computed tomography revealed that the left kidney was situated on the right side and fused with the right kidney. The renal pelvises of both kidneys were fused, and a single ureter, located on the right side, was draining both kidneys into the bladder. The patient was advised to have regular follow-ups.

Conclusion

Crossed fused renal ectopia with a single ureter represents a rare renal anomaly. Asymptomatic patients can typically be managed conservatively. Regular follow-up is recommended to monitor renal function, calculus formation, infections, and malignant changes.

Peer Review reports

Background

Crossed fused renal ectopia (CFRE) commonly appears in routine imaging, where both kidneys are situated on one side of the body and are either partially or fully fused [1]. Typically, CFRE is drained by two ureters, each emptying into its respective side. However, CFRE drained by a single ureter is exceedingly rare, with very few reported cases documented in the literature [2]. In the majority of instances, CFRE remains asymptomatic and is often incidentally discovered during imaging studies. However, some cases may manifest with symptoms such as calculi and infection, attributed to the abnormal positioning of the pelvicalyceal system and ureter, leading to urinary stasis [3]. Moreover, CFRE may be associated with various urological and non-urological abnormalities, including vesicoureteral reflux, pelviureteric junction obstruction, undescended testis, tetralogy of Fallot, sacral agenesis, vaginal agenesis, and anal abnormalities [4].

Case report

A 46-year-old Nepali male presented to the outpatient department of a tertiary care center with a 2-year history of multiple episodes of lithuria. He reported experiencing right flank pain during the episodes of lithuria, describing it as dull and colicky, radiating to the groin region, moderate in intensity, and exacerbated by movement. Additionally, he mentioned experiencing undocumented fever during these episodes but had not sought medical assistance until now. At the time of presentation, the patient was asymptomatic, and physical and systemic examinations yielded normal results. Blood and urine investigations showed no apparent abnormalities. The patient had no other illnesses. He was mentally fine and stable. There was no history of hereditary and non-hereditary illness in the family. He was from a middle class family and could afford the hospital expenses.

Ultrasonography revealed the absence of the left kidney in the left renal fossa, with a malrotated, relatively large kidney observed on the right side. The possibility of crossed fused renal ectopia (CFRE) was suggested, leading to a recommendation for computed tomography (CT) urography. The CT urography confirmed right-sided CFRE (Fig. 1b) with a single ipsilateral ureter (Figs. 2, 3) with the left kidney located on the right side of the abdomen (Fig. 1a, b). The lower pole of the right kidney was fused with the upper pole of the left kidney, forming an “L”-type configuration (Fig. 1b). The renal pelvises of both kidneys were fused, and a single ureter on the ipsilateral side drained into the urinary bladder (Figs. 2, 3). Four renal arteries supplied the kidneys (Fig. 4a), and three renal veins drained them (Fig. 4b). The urinary bladder was essentially normal (Fig. 5). No calculi were present in the kidneys, ureter, or urinary bladder, and no other associated congenital anomalies were found. Echocardiography was performed to assess for cardiac anomalies, which showed normal results. Since the patient’s renal function remained intact and there were no issues stemming from the anomaly, he was counseled about the condition and advised to schedule regular follow-up appointments. The patient came to our outpatient department for a single follow-up visit after 6 months from the initial visit until the time we submitted this manuscript. He had no significant problems and exhibited good renal function.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography images in a soft tissue window. In a, a coronal section image at the level of bilateral renal fossa reveals the absence of the left kidney (purple arrow) and the presence of the right kidney (yellow arrow). b Displays an oblique reformatted image showing the right kidney formed by the fusion of two moieties (each shown by white and red arrows)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography coronal section delayed phase images with maximum intensity projection depicting normal contrast opacification of the calyces, pelvis, and ureter of the crossed fused renal ectopia right kidney (red arrow). Some of the calyces and pelvis are malrotated, with only one ureter present (yellow arrow). The urinary bladder is indicated by the blue arrow

Fig. 3
figure 3

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography coronal section delayed phase curved reformatted images reveal two moieties in the right kidney (shown by white and red arrows), with only one ureter present (yellow arrow). The urinary bladder is shown by the blue arrow. The left renal fossa and other potential ectopic sites show the absence of the kidney

Fig. 4
figure 4

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography coronal section images illustrate the vascular anatomy of the right kidney in a CFRE. a exhibits four arteries supplying the right kidney (green arrows), while b shows three veins draining the kidney (yellow arrows) into the inferior vena cava

Fig. 5
figure 5

A contrast-enhanced computed tomography axial section delayed phase image at the level of the urinary bladder demonstrates normal opacification of the bladder (blue arrow)

Discussion

Crossed fused renal ectopia (CFRE) ranks as the second most common renal fusion anomaly following horseshoe kidney, with an incidence ranging from 1 in 1300 to 1 in 7500 [3]. CFRE is characterized by the partial or complete fusion of both kidneys on the same side of the body. The occurrence of CFRE drained by a single ipsilateral ureter is a rare phenomenon, with only a few reported cases documented in the literature. McDonald and McClellan have identified six variations of CFRE [1, 2] (Table 1).

Table 1 McDonald and McClellan classification of CFRE

The development of CFRE is intricately linked to the embryogenesis of the kidneys. Kidneys originate from the metanephros (of mesodermal origin) and the ureteric bud (derived from the Wolffian duct) [5]. While the embryogenesis of CFRE remains incompletely understood, two theories have been proposed: the ureteric theory and the mechanical theory [2]. According to the ureteric theory, excessive bending of the ureter and embryonal caudal end rotation of the metanephros prevent the ureter from meeting the metanephros on the same side, instead stimulating the metanephros of the contralateral side, resulting in CFRE. The mechanical theory suggests that an abnormally positioned umbilical artery obstructs the ascent of the developed kidney into its respective renal fossa. Consequently, the kidney follows the path of least resistance, leading to its placement on the contralateral side and the formation of CFRE.

However, the occurrence of CFRE drained by a single ureter cannot be fully explained by either of these theories, necessitating a reexamination of their premises. The arteries and veins associated with CFRE exhibit a wide range of variations [6]. CFRE is more commonly observed in males and typically affects the right side [7].

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) stands out as the most prevalent urological abnormality that commonly coexists with CFRE [4]. Alongside VUR, CFRE may be accompanied by other urogenital abnormalities such as pelviureteric junction obstruction (PUJO), hypospadias, undescended testis, and multicystic dysplastic kidney. Furthermore, CFRE may also present with non-urological abnormalities including tetralogy of Fallot, sacral agenesis, vaginal agenesis, and anal abnormalities.

The majority of CFRE cases are asymptomatic and often go undetected. However, some cases are incidentally discovered during imaging studies. CFRE can lead to urine stasis, fostering the development of renal calculi, infections, malignancies, and other complications [8]. In instances where CFRE is associated with VUR and PUJO, it may manifest as hydronephrosis [9]. Asymptomatic cases generally require no immediate intervention but necessitate regular follow-up to monitor renal function, assess for calculi formation, infections, and malignancies [10]. Surgical management is warranted for cases associated with VUR and PUJO. Treatment becomes imperative if calculi, infection, or malignancy are present at the time of diagnosis.

The biggest strength of this case report lies in its detailed documentation of a highly rare anomaly, accompanied by clear pictures. Few documentations exist to date describing this anomaly, making this manuscript a valuable reference for medical students, residents, and practitioners managing similar cases. However, our study has limitations. It focuses solely on a single case, necessitating further exploration of this anomaly’s characteristics and significance. Additional cases and longer-term follow-up studies are needed to deepen our understanding. Our follow-up period was limited to 6 months.

Conclusion

The presence of a single draining ureter in CFRE signifies a rare renal anomaly, prompting inquiries into ureteric and mechanical theories. CFRE exhibits diverse variations in arteries, veins, and the ureter, emphasizing the necessity of thorough comprehension before embarking on any urological surgical interventions. CFRE engenders urinary stasis, thereby promoting the formation of calculi and infection. Consequently, diligent follow-up is crucial for monitoring renal function and averting the onset of calculi and infection.

Availability of data and materials

The data and material are not available in public repository, since this is a case report.

References

  1. Babu CSR, Sharma V, Gupta OP. Renal fusion anomalies: a review of surgical anatomy. Anat Physiol. 2015;5:S5-001. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0940.S5-001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumawat G, Singla M, Mehta N, et al. Crossed complete fused left to right renal ectopia with solitary left ureter: a rare ‘case report.’ Afr J Urol. 2020;26:76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-020-00084-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Khanduri S, Tyagi E, Yadav VK, Pandey S, Yadav H, Khan M. Crossed fused renal ectopia with single ureter and single renal vein: a rare case. Cureus. 2019;11(1): e3914. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3914.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Reddy SJ, Shah MJ, Reddy BS, Chawla A, Singh A, Reddy BV. Crossed fused renal ectopia: a report of twelve cases at a tertiary health centre and literature review. Int J Res Med Sci. 2022;10:1161–8. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20221191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Calado AA, Macedo A Jr, Srougi M. Cake kidney drained by single ureter. Int Braz J Urol. 2004;30(4):321–2. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-55382004000400011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gite V, Dhakne B. Single ureter draining crossed fused renal ectopia with single renal vein: case report. Int Surg J. 2024;11:315–7. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20240194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bakshi S. Incidentally detected pancake kidney: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2020;14(1):129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-020-02455-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Habtemichael K, Mohammed S, Beyene B, Gebreegziabher F, Abdulaziz M. Crossed fused renal ectopia (pancake type) with single ureter: a case report. Urol Case Rep. 2021;39: 101784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eucr.2021.101784.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaur N, Saha S, Mriglani R, Saini P, Gupta A. Crossed fused renal ectopia with a single ureter: a rare anomaly. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2013;24(4):773–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/1319-2442.113881.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hajji F, Moufid K, Ghoundale O, Touiti D. A rare case of pelviureteric junction obstruction in the uncrossed kidney of a crossed fused renal ectopia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018;100(8):e1–3. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2018.0141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement to be made.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Prajwal Dahal: Conceptualization and manuscript writing. Kapil Dawadi: Literature search. Ongden Yonjen Tamang: Manuscript writing. Sabina Parajuli: Manuscript writing. Natasha Dhakal: Manuscript writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prajwal Dahal.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval is not required for this manuscript, since this is a case report. Consent to participate was obtained from the patient. A copy of the consent form is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they do not have any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dahal, P., Dawadi, K., Tamang, O.Y. et al. An uncommon encounter: crossed fused renal ectopia with singular ureter: a case report. J Med Case Reports 18, 352 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-024-04689-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-024-04689-8

Keywords