Open Peer Review Reports for: Necrotizing fasciitis – a diagnostic dilemma: two case reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 Feb 2014 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 27 Mar 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - amrinderjit kanwar |
| 31 Mar 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vijay Malpathak |
| 8 Apr 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Rayno Navinan |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 8 Apr 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 14 Apr 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vijay Malpathak |
| 16 Apr 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - amrinderjit kanwar |
| 17 Apr 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Rayno Navinan |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 17 Apr 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 22 Apr 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 25 Jun 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1752-1947-8-229 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
