This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Necrotizing fasciitis – a diagnostic dilemma: two case reports
© Navinan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 26 February 2014
Accepted: 22 April 2014
Published: 25 June 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 Feb 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - amrinderjit kanwar|
|31 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vijay Malpathak|
|8 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Rayno Navinan|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vijay Malpathak|
|16 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - amrinderjit kanwar|
|17 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Rayno Navinan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Apr 2014||Editorially accepted|
|25 Jun 2014||Article published||10.1186/1752-1947-8-229|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.