Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Recurrent urethrovesical anastomotic strictures following artificial urinary sphincter implantation: a case report

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
31 Oct 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Stavros Tyritzis
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francesco Berardinelli
28 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andreas Skolarikos
20 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anastasios Anastasiadis
27 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Stavros Tyritzis
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francesco Berardinelli
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
3 Apr 2012 Editorially accepted
3 Apr 2012 Article published 10.1186/1752-1947-6-94

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement