This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Unusual presentation of eosinophilic fasciitis: two case reports and a review of the literature
© Danis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 21 September 2009
Accepted: 8 February 2010
Published: 8 February 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Sep 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Sep 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Tanya Costa|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Sep 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Oct 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - saeedeh farajzadeh|
|19 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Masutaka Furue|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Jan 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Tanya Costa|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|14 Jan 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 Feb 2010||Editorially accepted|
|8 Feb 2010||Article published||10.1186/1752-1947-4-46|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.