Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Persistent left superior vena cava mistaken for nodal metastasis: a case report

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Dec 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Dec 2008 Author responded Author comments - Vasilios Tzilas
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Dec 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Dec 2008 Author responded Author comments - Vasilios Tzilas
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Dec 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Dec 2008 Author responded Author comments - Vasilios Tzilas
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Dec 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Dec 2008 Author responded Author comments - Vasilios Tzilas
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Dec 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
13 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kostas Spiropoulos
12 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sven Fischer
24 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Vasilios Tzilas
Resubmission - Version 7
24 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 7
23 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Vasilios Tzilas
Resubmission - Version 8
23 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 8
10 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Vasilios Tzilas
Resubmission - Version 9
10 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
9 Jun 2010 Editorially accepted
9 Jun 2010 Article published 10.1186/1752-1947-4-174

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement