Tenosynovial giant cell tumors as accidental findings after episodes of distortion of the ankle: two case reports
© Illian et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 6 May 2008
Accepted: 15 December 2009
Published: 15 December 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 May 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Jun 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Christian Illian|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 Jun 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|6 Jan 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gunter Spahn|
|14 Jan 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Luthje|
|3 May 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Christian Illian|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|3 May 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|26 Nov 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Christian Illian|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|26 Nov 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|15 Dec 2009||Editorially accepted|
|15 Dec 2009||Article published||10.1186/1752-1947-3-9331|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.