Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: An unusual variant of choledochal cyst: a case report

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Jan 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Javaid Sadiq
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Javaid Sadiq
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
7 Aug 2008 Author responded Author comments - Javaid Sadiq
Resubmission - Version 5
7 Aug 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
9 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mohamed Fahmy
9 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amin Gohary
2 Oct 2008 Author responded Author comments - Javaid Sadiq
Resubmission - Version 7
2 Oct 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
9 Feb 2009 Editorially accepted
9 Feb 2009 Article published 10.1186/1752-1947-3-54

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement