Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Post coital aortic dissection: a case report

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Mar 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Apr 2007 Author responded Author comments - Gareth Morris-Stiff
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Apr 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wing Tai Siu
29 Jun 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Klompas
24 Jul 2007 Author responded Author comments - Gareth Morris-Stiff
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Jul 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Sep 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Klompas
25 Oct 2007 Author responded Author comments - Gareth Morris-Stiff
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Oct 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
7 Dec 2007 Author responded Author comments - Gareth Morris-Stiff
Resubmission - Version 6
7 Dec 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 6
20 Dec 2007 Author responded Author comments - Gareth Morris-Stiff
Resubmission - Version 7
20 Dec 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 7
30 Dec 2007 Author responded Author comments - Gareth Morris-Stiff
Resubmission - Version 8
30 Dec 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
16 Jan 2008 Editorially accepted
16 Jan 2008 Article published 10.1186/1752-1947-2-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement