A case of penile fracture with complete urethral disruption during sexual intercourse: a case report
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|9 Dec 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|14 Mar 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephen Beck|
|29 Mar 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Evangelos Liatsikos|
|5 Apr 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Klemen Jagodic|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|5 Apr 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|Resubmission - Version 8|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 8|
|Resubmission - Version 9|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 9|
|Resubmission - Version 10|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 10|
|1 May 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Klemen Jagodic|
|Resubmission - Version 11|
|1 May 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 11|
|2 May 2007||Editorially accepted|
|2 May 2007||Article published||10.1186/1752-1947-1-14|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.