Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Necrotizing fasciitis – a diagnostic dilemma: two case reports

  • Mitrakrishnan Rayno Navinan1Email author,
  • Jevon Yudhishdran1,
  • Thambyaiah Kandeepan1 and
  • Aruna Kulatunga1
Journal of Medical Case Reports20148:229

DOI: 10.1186/1752-1947-8-229

Received: 26 February 2014

Accepted: 22 April 2014

Published: 25 June 2014

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Feb 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - amrinderjit kanwar
31 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vijay Malpathak
8 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Rayno Navinan
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vijay Malpathak
16 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - amrinderjit kanwar
17 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Rayno Navinan
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
22 Apr 2014 Editorially accepted
25 Jun 2014 Article published 10.1186/1752-1947-8-229

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Hospital of Sri Lanka

Advertisement