Postpartum spontaneous dissection of the first obtuse marginal branch of the left circumflex coronary artery causing acute coronary syndrome: a case report and literature review
- Khurram Shahzad†1Email author,
- Long Cao1,
- Quara Tul Ain1,
- Jennifer Waddy1,
- Nawazish Khan1 and
- Rajasekhar Nekkanti1
© Shahzad et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 21 June 2012
Accepted: 22 January 2013
Published: 19 March 2013
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection is a rare but important cause of acute coronary syndrome. It can cause unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, and sudden death. The condition commonly affects young females with about one-third of the cases occurring during pregnancy and the peripartum period. The diagnosis may occasionally be overlooked as the patients are often young and have no risk factors for coronary artery disease.
Here we report the case of a 29-year-old African American woman who presented with acute coronary syndrome due to spontaneous dissection of the first obtuse marginal branch of the left circumflex coronary artery at three weeks post-partum and recovered requiring only medical management, possibly by longitudinal distribution of the intramural hematoma leading to good distal flow.
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection should be suspected in all young multiparous females presenting with chest pain in the peripartum period even in the absence of risk factors. Urgent diagnosis by angiography is required. It is recommended that treatment should be tailored to meet individual circumstances. Patients who present with single-vessel disease and hemodynamic stability, and who receive medical treatment with anticoagulation, nitrates and a beta-blocker, should experience good results.
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare cause of acute coronary syndrome with less understood pathophysiological mechanisms. Coronary artery dissection can occur spontaneously or as a consequence of chest trauma, cardiac surgery, coronary angiography, coronary intervention, or as an extension of aortic dissection. SCAD was first described in 1931, during autopsy findings in a 42-year-old woman who died after presenting with chest pain . Approximately 400 documented cases of SCAD have been reported. This is likely an underestimate due to a significant number of spontaneous dissections presenting with sudden death [2, 3]. The overall incidence of SCAD in angiographic series ranges from 0.28% to 1.1% [4, 5]. There is a predominance of SCAD in young women (70%) of which approximately 30% of cases occur in the peripartum period . The true etiopathological mechanisms remain unclear. Possible risk factors of the cases occurring in the peripartum period include hormonal changes, hemodynamic stress and changes in autoimmune status.
The left anterior descending (LAD) artery is the most frequent location of dissection. In angiographic and autopsy series, the LAD accounts for over 60% of coronary dissections [6, 7]. Involvement of the right coronary artery (RCA), left main coronary artery, and left circumflex (LCX) artery is uncommon.
The diagnosis of SCAD may occasionally be overlooked as the patients are often young and have no risk factors for coronary artery disease. Historically, most cases have been diagnosed on autopsy until the first angiographic diagnosis in 1978 . Because of the rarity of the condition, no management guidelines exist. Here we describe the clinical presentation and interesting angiographic findings in a case of acute coronary syndrome with dissection of the first obtuse marginal (OM1) branch of the LCX with a brief discussion of a possible mechanism of recovery in the context of current management options.
A 29-year-old African American woman was admitted with sudden onset of substernal chest pain. She was three weeks post-partum and this was her fifth baby. Her pregnancy and delivery was uneventful. Pain started while she was feeding her newborn. It was sharp, substernal, associated with shortness of breath (SOB) and diaphoresis. She also noticed left arm numbness and tingling. She had no past medical history of chest pain, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, connective tissue disease or heart failure. There was no family history of premature coronary artery disease (CAD). On admission, her electrocardiogram showed bigeminy without any ST-segment or T-wave changes. Cardiac enzymes were elevated with the peak troponin level of 31ng/ml. Based on this presentation, diagnosis of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) was made and the patient was started on heparin, clopidogrel (Plavix), beta-blocker, and nitrates. To rule out pulmonary embolism (PE) the patient underwent a computerized tomographic angiogram (CTA) of her chest, which was found to be normal. The patient was transferred to our facility for further management.
Peripartum dissection has been associated with the presence of eosinophils. Eosinophilic infiltrates have been described in the coronary artery adventitia in autopsy studies of SCAD without coronary atherosclerosis . Eosinophilic granules contain numerous lytic substances, including collagenase, peroxidase, major basic protein, and acid phosphatase. These substances may break down the medial-adventitial layers and lead to dissection. During labor and the peripartum period, eosinophils infiltrate the uterus and serum collagenase levels increase. The presence of eosinophils in dissected coronary arteries may be a systemic manifestation of this process . In animal studies, estrogen and progesterone can induce eosinophils to release granules that contain lytic substances [11, 12]. Elevations of estrogen and progesterone occur during pregnancy and the peripartum period. In addition, during pregnancy there are microstructural changes in the elastic and collagen fibers of the tunica media of the aorta that may be caused by hormonal and hemodynamic factors . These changes could also occur in the coronary arteries, possibly contributing to the predisposition to dissection in the peripartum period .
The location and distribution of dissection in our case is very important. The involvement of the OM1 branch, as in our case, had been rarely reported in literature. The longitudinal distribution of dissection from proximal to mid-distal end of the OM1 with normal distal flow can only explain the early recovery process but not the initial presentation of the patient. We hypothesize that maybe in our patient there was a development of hematoma coexisting with the arterial spasm or later development of spasm. The sheer pressure generated by the spasm, with the preexisting separation of wall layers, might have caused the longitudinal distribution of the hematoma with the decrease in the lumen blockage and improvement in the distal flow (Figure 2). This longitudinal distribution luckily not only saved the patient from undergoing coronary intervention, but also helped recovery with only medical management.
Management of SCAD depends on the clinical presentation and individual circumstances including site of the dissection, the number of vessels involved and the coronary flow status . Hemodynamic status, often related to the extent of the dissection, also determines management. Medical treatment and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are usually sufficient to restore coronary flow and stable hemodynamics . Surgery with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is considered in severe cases with multiple vessel disease, presentation with hemodynamic instability and/or in cases with failure of revascularization. In a series of 23 cases, Vanzetto et al.  reported that bypass was performed five times for four left main coronary dissections and one LAD coronary dissection and angioplasty eight times for proximal large trunk lesions, while ten distal dissections were managed medically.
Before the angiographic diagnosis during the acute phase, some patients are managed by thrombolysis. Thrombolytics have been accused of favoring intramedial hematoma extension and compression of the true lumen. They could indeed be harmful. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors are likewise contraindicated. Once the diagnosis of SCAD has been confirmed, in the case of stable hemodynamics and single-vessel disease affecting a limited territory, medical treatment is a reasonable option as was the case with our patient. Medical treatment involves anticoagulation with heparin for the first days, given the risk of thrombosis of the true channel due to slowed flow, antiplatelet therapy and beta-blockers. The combination of acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel may be preferable to monotherapy .
In case of medical management, close surveillance is necessary with angiographic control for the first three months. Evolution may be toward spontaneous cicatrization (in 50% of cases), persistent dissection with or without ischemia  or formation of a pseudoaneurysm .
SCAD is a rare but serious cause of acute coronary syndrome with the majority of cases associated with pregnancy. SCAD should be suspected in all young multiparous women presenting with chest pain in the peripartum period, even in the absence of risk factors. Urgent diagnosis by angiography is required. It is recommended that treatment should be tailored to meet individual circumstances. Presentation with single-vessel disease and hemodynamic stability, medical treatment with anticoagulation, nitrates and a beta-blocker should produce good results.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
Coronary artery bypass grafting
Coronary artery disease
Computerized tomographic angiogram
Left anterior descending
Left heart catheterization
Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
First obtuse marginal branch
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Right coronary artery
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection
Systemic lupus erythematosus
Shortness of breath.
- Pretty H: Dissecting aneurysm of coronary artery in a woman aged 42. Br Med J. 1931, 1: 667-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jorgensen MB, Aharonian V, Mansukhani P, Mahrer PR: Spontaneous coronary dissection: a cluster of cases with this rare finding. Am Heart J. 1994, 127: 1382-1387. 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90060-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thayer JO, Healy EW, Maggs PR: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987, 44: 97-102. 10.1016/S0003-4975(10)62372-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nishikawa H, Nakanishi S, Nishiyama S, Nishimura S, Seki A, Yamaguchi H: Primary coronary artery dissection observed at coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol. 1988, 61: 645-648. 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90782-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hering D, Piper C, Hohmann C, Schultheiss HP, Horstkotte D: Incidence, etiology and therapy of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. A prospective monocenter study of 3800 consecutive patients. Z Kardiol. 1998, 87: 961-970. 10.1007/s003920050253.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- DeMaio SJ, Kinsella SH, Silvermann ME: Clinical course and long-term prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Am J Cardiol. 1989, 64: 471-474. 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90423-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thompson EA, Ferraris S, Gress T, Ferraris V: Gender differences and predictors of mortality in spontaneous coronary dissection: a review of reported cases. J Invasive Cardiol. 2005, 17: 59-61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ciraulo DA, Chesne RB: Coronary arterial dissection: an unrecognized cause of myocardial infarction, with subsequent coronary arterial patency. Chest. 1978, 73: 677-679. 10.1378/chest.73.5.677.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robinowitz M, Virmani R, McAllister H: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection and eosinophilic inflammation: a cause and effect relationship?. Am J Med. 1982, 72: 923-928. 10.1016/0002-9343(82)90853-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Borczuk AC, van Hoeven KH, Factor SM: Review and hypothesis: The eosinophil and peripartum heart disease (myocarditis and coronary artery dissection) - coincidence or pathogenetic significance?. Cardiovas Res. 1997, 33: 527-532. 10.1016/S0008-6363(96)00257-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tchernitchin AN, Barrera J, Arroyo P, Mena MA, Vilches K, Grunert G: Degranulatory action of estradiol on blood eosinophil leukocytes in vivo and in vitro. Agents Actions. 1985, 17: 60-66. 10.1007/BF01966683.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grunert G, Tchernitchin AN: Effect of progesterone on the non-genomic response to estrogen in the rat. J Endocrinol. 1982, 94: 307-315. 10.1677/joe.0.0940307.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Manalo-Estrella P, Barker AE: Histopathologic findings in human aortic media associated with pregnancy. Arch Pathol. 1967, 83: 336-341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kamran M, Guptan A, Bogal M: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: case series and review. J Invasive Cardiol. 2008, 10: 553-559.Google Scholar
- Jaffe BD: Cocaine–induced coronary artery dissection. N Engl J Med. 1994, 330: 550-551. 10.1056/NEJM199402243300808.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mark DB, Kong Y, Whalen RE: Variant angina and coronary artery dissection. Am J Cardiol. 1985, 56: 485-486. 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90894-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gleich G: Current understanding of eosinophil function. Hosp Practice. 1988, 15: 97-120.Google Scholar
- Kamineni R, Sadhu A, Alpert J: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: report of two cases and a 50-year review of the literature. Cardiol Rev. 2002, 10: 279-284. 10.1097/00045415-200209000-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Auer J, Punzengruber C, Berent R, Weber T, Lamm G, Hartl P, Eber B: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection involving the left main stem: assessment by intravascular ultrasound. Heart. 2004, 90: e39-10.1136/hrt.2004.035659.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mulvany NJ, Ranson DL, Pilbeam MC: Isolated dissection of the coronary artery: a postmortem study of seven cases. Pathology. 2001, 33: 307-311.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sherif HM, Nguyen HC, Sarter BH, West JT, Lucente E, Fink DM, Quesada-Rojas A, Banbury MK: Spontaneous coronary dissection in late pregnancy: a multidisciplinary approach to management. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008, 85: 1793-1794. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.11.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Motreff P, Souteyrand G, Dauphin C, Eschalier R, Cassagnes J, Lusson JR: Management of spontaneous coronary artery dissection: review of the literature and discussion based on a series of 12 young women with acute coronary syndrome. Cardiology. 2010, 115: 10-18. 10.1159/000244608.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vanzetto G, Berger-Coz E, Barone-Rochette G, Chavanon O, Bouvaist H, Hacini R, Blin D, Machecourt J: Prevalence, therapeutic management and medium-term prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection: results from a database of 11,605 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009, 35: 250-254. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.10.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maeder M, Ammann P, Drack G, Rickli H: Pregnancy-associated spontaneous coronary artery dissection: impact of medical treatment. Case report and systematic review. Z Kardiol. 2005, 94: 829-835. 10.1007/s00392-005-0302-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koller PT, Cliffe CM: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001, 53: 577-579.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aqel RA, Zoghbi GJ, Iskandrian A: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection, aneurysms, and pseudoaneurysms: a review. Echocardiography. 2004, 21: 175-182. 10.1111/j.0742-2822.2004.03050.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.