Open Access

Leiomyosarcoma of the base of the tongue and free edge of the epiglottis: a case report

Journal of Medical Case Reports20126:400

DOI: 10.1186/1752-1947-6-400

Received: 9 February 2012

Accepted: 18 September 2012

Published: 23 November 2012

Abstract

Introduction

We present the case of a man with a leiomyosarcoma of the base of the tongue. We feel this case is important as this kind of pathology, though rare, can occur at a site where carcinomas are more frequent.

Case presentation

A 77-year-old Caucasian man had been reporting difficulty in swallowing and hoarseness for a month before admission to our department. After several preliminary tests, including a biopsy which was positive for a malignant epithelial neoplasm which required further immunohistochemical study, we decided to operate, removing the base of our patient’s tongue and performing a total laryngectomy. Histological examination of the specimen revealed a high-grade leiomyosarcoma of the base of the tongue and of the free edge of the epiglottis.

Conclusions

We wish to stress the rarity of this clinical case, related to the site of implantation of the tumor, as confirmed by the difficulties in finding reference to this topic in the international literature. In fact, several cases of leiomyosarcoma have been described, but in different locations from that seen in our patient’s case.

Keywords

Base of the tongue Free edge of the epiglottis Leiomyosarcoma Surgery

Introduction

Soft tissue sarcomas account for approximately 0.7 percent of all malignant neoplasms, and leiomyosarcomas have been reported to account for 3 percent to 7 percent of soft tissue sarcomas [1, 2]. The most frequent sites of occurrence are the uterine myometrium, gastrointestinal tract and skin [3]. The highest incidence occurs between 40 and 49 years of age. In fact, its presentation is unusual in children or in older patients. Women are more affected than men because of the uterine association. Leiomyosarcomas are infrequent in the oral cavity and oropharynx, but when present they are usually localized on the tongue, lips and palate [4]. The prognosis is poor, with a high percentage of recurrence or metastasis. The most common sites of metastasis include the lungs, bone, brain and the lymph nodes. This neoplasm is an extremely rare mesenchymal lesion in the oral cavity and oropharynx, with unusual bone location because of the paucity of smooth muscle in that site [5, 6]. When it occurs in these locations, it appears as a slow-growth mass, symptomatic only in exceptional cases [7]. The main symptoms are pain, teeth mobility, or even difficulty in chewing, usually when the tumor is located in the tongue, lips or palate [8]. Due to its unspecific clinical presentation, diagnosis is made after histological study [9], where the typical small smooth muscle cells are seen, being of uniform size and with no features of malignancy. In order to achieve more specific analysis and more precise differential diagnosis immunohistochemical studies must be carried out. Surgery is the only effective treatment at this time. It is important to perform a complete resection in order to avoid recurrences [8]. This is usually easily achieved due to its characteristics as a well-circumscribed tumor. Here, we describe a case of leiomyosarcoma of the base of the tongue. From a histological point of view this is a rare kind of pathology in a site where carcinomas are more frequent.

Case presentation

We present the case of a 77-year-old Caucasian man with a leiomyosarcoma of the base of the tongue. He had reported difficulty in swallowing and hoarseness for a month before admission to our department. He also reported a history of dyspnea during exercise and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treated with salmeterol 50μg (two puffs/day). He was a long-term smoker, with lipid disorders and allergy to aspirin.

Endoscopy and a computed tomography scan showed a mass on the basis of the tongue (Figure 1), on which a biopsy was performed. The biopsy results indicated a malignant epithelial neoplasm, which required further immunohistochemical studies, ulcerated and infiltrative with spindle cells on the base of the tongue and free edge of the epiglottis.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-1947-6-400/MediaObjects/13256_2012_Article_2372_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Computed tomography image demonstrating the mass.

Our patient was hospitalized and underwent surgery. Before the operation, we performed a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) procedure to facilitate the nutrition of our patient after the intervention, since removal of the tongue base can be associated with difficulties in swallowing.

After insertion of a central venous line in the right subclavian vein our patient underwent surgery consisting of a tracheostomy performed under general anesthesia, preparation of a cervical flap, bilateral neck dissections (levels 2 to 4) on which an extemporaneous examination was performed (proving negative for lymph node metastases), isolation of the hypoglossal nerves and examination of their entry into the tongue base to preserve these structures, total laryngectomy extended to the base of the tongue, preparation of a myofascial flap of the left pectoralis major muscle (chosen because our patient is right-handed) and its positioning at the base of the tongue, placement of drainages and trachea tube and dressing.

The definitive histological examination performed on surgical specimens (Figure 2) showed leiomyosarcoma of the base of the tongue and free edge of the epiglottis and the absence of neoplastic infiltration of surgical resection margins. Immunohistochemical studies performed on the biopsy confirmed the same diagnosis.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-1947-6-400/MediaObjects/13256_2012_Article_2372_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Posterior macroscopic view of the surgical specimen.

Our patient had a regular post-operative course and was discharged from our clinic, able to use both PEG enteral and mouth feeding.

To date, about eight months after surgery, our patient remains disease free.

Discussion

Leiomyosarcoma is a malignant neoplasm that originates from smooth muscle. It frequently occurs in the uterine myometrium, gastrointestinal tract, retroperitoneum, skin and subcutaneous tissue. It rarely occurs in the head and neck, probably because of the paucity of smooth muscle tissue in these sites [5]. The most common sites of leiomyosarcoma in the oral cavity and oropharynx are the tunica media of blood vessels, the ductus lingualis, the circumvallate papillae, the myoepithelial cells or the undifferentiated mesenchymal cells. Other locations include the lips, tongue, and hard and soft palate. The most common sites of leiomyosarcomas include the maxilla and mandible [10].

Primary leiomyosarcoma of the tongue is a rare lesion. The cause of leiomyosarcoma remains unknown, although cases have been associated with trauma, estrogenic stimulation, ionizing irradiation and Epstein-Barr virus [11, 12]. Diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma is based on pathologic criteria. The histological criteria are based on a typical pattern of interlacing bundles of smooth muscle cells with a high mitotic rate, pleomorphism, and bizarre cell forms; these are all indicative of malignancy. The differential diagnosis includes several types of tumor characterized by prominent spindle cell features and may be extremely difficult when these tumors display atypical morpho-architectural features and/or arise in uncommon sites. Immunohistochemistry or electron microscopy are accepted as useful tools for confirming the diagnosis [1315]. In our patient’s case it was not possible to make a definitive diagnosis on biopsy. Initially atypical cells, atypical mitoses and fusiform aspects led us to a diagnosis of poorly differentiated epidermoid carcinoma with spindle cell aspects (Figure 3). Combining morphological and immunohistochemical studies we came to the final diagnosis. In fact, test results for cytokines AE1 and AE2 were negative (excluding the diagnosis of carcinoma), vimentin and smooth muscle actin were positive (confirming the sarcomatous nature of the lesion), and the proliferation index ‘MIB1’ was quantified to 60 percent (Figure 4). To date, we only know of 20 cases reported (including our patient’s case) of primary leiomyosarcoma of the tongue (Table 1) (Figure 5) [1533].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-1947-6-400/MediaObjects/13256_2012_Article_2372_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Histological examination of biopsy: (a) necrosis and atypia of the tumor; (b) plurinucleate cells; (c) cell with atypical mitosis;(d) fusiform aspects.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-1947-6-400/MediaObjects/13256_2012_Article_2372_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Immunohistochemical studies: (a) cytokines AE1 and AE2 negative; (b) vimentin positive; (c) smooth muscle actin positive, (d) proliferation index ‘MIB1’ was 60 percent.

Table 1

Previously recorded cases of leiomyosarcoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx

Authors

Date

Sex

Age

Location

Treatment

Blanc et al. Gaz Hebd Med Chir 21: 611 [16]

1884

M

33

Tongue

-

Glas et al. Wien Klin Wscher 18:168 [17]

1905

M

44

Tongue

-

Stout et al. Am J Cancer 34:31 (case 1) [18]

1938

M

50

Tongue

-

Stout et al. Am J Cancer 34:31 (case 2) [18]

1938

W

29

Base of tongue

-

Burford et al. Am J Orthhod 30:395 [19]

1944

M

32

Base of tongue

-

Yannopoulo et al. Cancer 15: 958 [20]

1962

M

1

Tip of tongue

Excision

Bertelli et al. Oral Surg 19: 771 [21]

1965

M

43

Tip of tongue

-

MacDonald et al. Br J Oral Surg 6:207 [22]

1969

W

11

Dorsum of tongue

Excision

Goldberg et al. J Oral Surg 28:608 [23]

1970

M

54

Tip of tongue

Excision

Lack et al. Pediatr Pathol 6:181 [24]

1986

M

2.5

Base of tongue

Excision and chemiotherapy

Aydin et al. Oral Oncol Eur F Cancer 30B(5):351 [25]

1994

M

70

Base of tongue

Radiation therapy

Mayall et al. J Laryngol Otol 108:617 [26]

1994

M

60

Tip of tongue

Excision

Piattelli et al. J Oral Maxil Surg 53 M:698 [27]

1995

W

80

Lateral border of tongue

Patient rejected treatment

Lo Muzio et al. Oral Oncol 36:519 [28]

2000

M

67

Lateral border of tongue

Excision

Vora et al. Oto H N Surg 128:601 [29]

2003

W

62

Lateral border of tongue

Excision

Yang et al. Int J Oral Maxil Surg 35:469 [30]

2006

W

54

Tip of tongue

Excision

Castaldi et al. Acta Radiol 47:514 [31]

2006

W

52

Lateral border of tongue

Excision

Crossman et al. Br J Oral Maxil Surg 46:e69 [32]

2008

W

46

Lateral border of tongue

Excision

Pires et al. Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Edod 109:e31 [33]

2010

M

55

Lateral border of tongue

Excision

Present work

2011

M

77

Base of tongue

Excision

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-1947-6-400/MediaObjects/13256_2012_Article_2372_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Locations of leiomyosarcomas as reported in the literature (see also Table 1 ).

Table 1 provides a general overview on this topic and leads to a number of observations.

The age of these patients ranged from one to 80 years with a peak between the fifth or sixth decade of life, and there seems to be a slight gender predilection for men as seen in our experience. The sites of origin of the tumor lesions in the tongue include the tip, the lateral border and the base (Figure 5). It is interesting to note that our patient is one of the oldest of the five patients described with sarcoma of the base of the tongue.

The main treatment is excision with sufficient tumor free borders and post-operative irradiation when necessary. Radical neck dissection is reserved for cases with regional node involvement. Chemotherapy is generally reserved for palliative care and occasionally improves the survival time and quality of life of patients with metastatic disease or inoperable tumors [8].

The prognosis of oral leiomyosarcoma affecting the tongue is good if clear excision can be achieved.

In our patient’s case, we decided to treat the tumor surgically by removing the base of the tongue after planning at the beginning of treatment the preparation and placement of a myofascial flap of major pectoralis muscle to the remaining tongue in order to limit post-intervention swallowing problems from loss of the muscle tissue involved in swallowing. In the same way, in the light of possible post-operative complications, total laryngectomy was performed together with the removal of the base of the tongue due to the high risk of aspiration related to swallowing problems after partial laryngectomy in our patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Our decision to remove the bilateral laterocervical lymph nodes was dictated by the response of the biopsy, which did not indicate sarcoma, but carcinoma; the high risk of bilateral lymph nodes metastases from base of the tongue carcinomas is well known.

In addition, after a multidisciplinary consultation we decided not to subject our patient to radiotherapy; this was in light of observation of the negative margins of the surgical specimen, and respecting the wishes of our patient. This decision could possibly be questionable, given the tendency to local recurrence of sarcoma.

Conclusions

The number of reported cases of this malignant lesion of the tongue remains extremely small, but it is interesting to underline that our patient is the oldest man among the cases reported and his base of the tongue tumor was treated surgically.

Our surgical choices were based on the characteristics of lesions (especially their location), but also on the overall health of our patient.

Further data about these rare cases are needed to better understand their features in the future.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available if required by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
ENT Department, University ‘G. D’Annunzio’ of Chieti-Pescara, Hospital ‘SS. Annunziata’

References

  1. Gustafson P, Willén H, Baldetorp B, Fernö M, Åkerman M, Rynholm A: Soft tissue leiomyosarcoma. A population-based epidemiologic and prognostic study of 48 patients, including cellular DNA content. Cancer. 1992, 70: 114-119. 10.1002/1097-0142(19920701)70:1<114::AID-CNCR2820700119>3.0.CO;2-U.View ArticlePubMed
  2. Skoulakis C, Chimona TS, Tsirevelou P, Papadakis CE: Subcutaneus leiomyosarcoma of the neck: a case report. Cases J. 2010, 3: 52-10.1186/1757-1626-3-52.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  3. Soft Tissue Tumors. Edited by: Enzinger FM, Weis SW. 1995, St. Louis, MO: Mosby Year Book Inc, 491-510.
  4. Rey RL, Franco FL, Oliveira GG, Seijas BP, Guitiàn D, Lòpez-Cedrùn Cembranos JL: Oral leiomyoma in retromolar trigone. A case report. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007, 12: E53-E55.
  5. Schenberg ME, Slootweg PJ, Koole R: Leiomyosarcoma of the oral cavity. Report of four cases and review of the literature. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1993, 21: 342-347. 10.1016/S1010-5182(05)80495-0.View ArticlePubMed
  6. de Jesus Viana Pinheiro J, de Melo Alves S, Okuda E, Jorge WA, Jaeger RG, de Araùjo NS: Primary leiomyosarcoma of the mandible. A case report. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007, 12: E56-E59.
  7. Cherrick HM, Dunlap CL, King OH: Leiomyomas of the oral cavity. Review of the literature and clinicopathologic study of seven new cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973, 35: 54-66. 10.1016/0030-4220(73)90094-7.View ArticlePubMed
  8. Wertheimer-Hatch L, Hatch GF, HatchB SKF, Davis GB, Blanchard DK, Foster RS, Skandalakis JE: Tumors of the oral cavity and pharynx. World J Surg. 2000, 24: 395-400. 10.1007/s002689910064.View ArticlePubMed
  9. Ezinger F, Lattes R, Torloni H: Histological Typing of Soft Tissue and Tumors. 1969, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 30-31.
  10. Rapidis AD: Sarcomas of the head and neck in adult patients: current concepts and future perspectives. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2008, 8: 1271-1297. 10.1586/14737140.8.8.1271.View ArticlePubMed
  11. Tulbach A, Al-Dayel F, Fawaz I, Rosai J: Epstein-Barr virus associated leiomyosarcoma of the thyroid in a child with congenital immunodeficiency. A case report. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999, 23: 473-476. 10.1097/00000478-199904000-00013.View Article
  12. Cook T, Fosko S: Unusual cutaneous malignancies. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 1998, 17: 114-132. 10.1016/S1085-5629(98)80005-9.View ArticlePubMed
  13. Farole A, Manalo AE, Iranpour B: Lesion of the temporomanibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992, 50: 510-514. 10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80326-X.View ArticlePubMed
  14. Hashimoto H, Daimaru Y, Tsuneyoshi M, Enjoji M: Leiomyosarcoma of the external soft tissues. A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and electron microscopic study. Cancer. 1986, 57: 2077-2088. 10.1002/1097-0142(19860515)57:10<2077::AID-CNCR2820571033>3.0.CO;2-T.View ArticlePubMed
  15. Sonobe H, Furihata M, Hayashi K, Takahashi K, Ohtsuki Y, Kishimoto S: Poorly differentiated leiomyosarcoma of the maxillary sinus: a histological, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study. J Clin Electron Microscopy. 1987, 20: 219-227.
  16. Blanc E: Travaux originaux. Gaz Hebd Med Chir. 1884, 21: 611-
  17. Glas E: Beiträge zur Pathologie der Zungengrund tumoren. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1905, 18: 747-
  18. Stout AP: Leiomyoma of the oral cavity. Am J Cancer. 1938, 34: 31-View Article
  19. Burford W, Ackerman L, Robinson H: Leiomyoma of the tongue. Am J Orthod Oral Surg. 1944, 30: 395-View Article
  20. Yannopoulos K, Stout AP: Smoorh muscle tumor in children. Cancer. 1962, 15: 958-10.1002/1097-0142(196209/10)15:5<958::AID-CNCR2820150511>3.0.CO;2-U.View ArticlePubMed
  21. de Bertelli AP: Uncommon Tumors of the Tongue. Oral Surg. 1965, 19: 771-10.1016/0030-4220(65)90349-X.View Article
  22. MacDonald DG: Smooth muscle tumors of the mouth. Br J Oral Surg. 1969, 6: 207-214.View ArticlePubMed
  23. Goldberg MH, Polivy C, Saltzman S: Leiomyosarcoma of the tongue: report of the case. J Oral Surg. 1970, 28: 608-611.PubMed
  24. Lack EE: Leiomyosarcomas in childhood: a clinical and pathologic study of 10 cases. Pediatr Pathol. 1986, 6 (2–3): 181-197.View ArticlePubMed
  25. Aydin H, Dreyer T: Leimyosarcoma of the base of the tongue treated with radiotherapy: a case report. Oral Oncol, Eur F Cancer. 1994, 30B (5): 351-355.View Article
  26. Mayall F, Hickman J, Bulman C, Blewitt R: Leiomyosarcoma of the tongue: a very rare tumour. J Laringol Ootol. 1994, 108: 617-618.
  27. Piattelli A, Areste L: Leiomyiosarcoma of the tongue: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995, 53: M698-M701. 10.1016/0278-2391(95)90175-2.View Article
  28. Lo Muzio L, Flavia G, Mignogna MD, Piattelli A: Primary intraoral leiomyosarcoma of the ttongue an immunohistochemical study and review of the literature. Oral Oncol. 2000, 36: 519-524. 10.1016/S1368-8375(00)00044-0.View ArticlePubMed
  29. Vora NM, Levin RJ: Metastatic leiomyosarcoma to the tongue. Otoralyngol Head Neck Surg. 2003, 128: 601-602. 10.1016/S0194-5998(02)23263-5.View Article
  30. Yang SW, Chen TM, Tsai CY, Lin CY: A peculiar site of leiomyosarcoma: the tongue tip-report of a case. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006, 35: 469-471. 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.08.009.View ArticlePubMed
  31. Castaldi A, Arcuri T, Carta M, Quilici P, Derchi LE: Primary leiomyosarcoma of the oral tongue: magnetic resonance and ultrasonography findings with histopathologic correlation. Acta Radiol. 2006, 47: 514-517. 10.1080/02841850600647124.View ArticlePubMed
  32. Crossman T, Ward P, Herold J: Leiomyosarcoma of the tongue: a case report. Br J Oral Maxill Surg. 2008, 46: e69-e70. 10.1016/j.bjoms.2008.03.008.View Article
  33. Pires CAS, Pires LFS, Paber PA: A primary leiomyosarcoma of the lateral border of the tongue. Med Oral Patol Oral Radiol Edod. 2010, 109: e31-e33. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.013.View Article

Copyright

© Croce et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.