Open Access

Pelvic actinomycosis presenting as a malignant pelvic mass: a case report

  • Arife Simsek1Email author,
  • Asiye Perek,
  • Ibrahim Ethem Cakcak1 and
  • Ali Vedat Durgun1
Journal of Medical Case Reports20115:40

DOI: 10.1186/1752-1947-5-40

Received: 22 October 2009

Accepted: 27 January 2011

Published: 27 January 2011

Abstract

Introduction

Pelvic actinomycosis constitutes 3% of all human actinomycosis infections. It is usually insidious, and is often mistaken for other conditions such as diverticulitis, abscesses, inflammatory bowel disease and malignant tumors, presenting a diagnostic challenge pre-operatively; it is identified post-operatively in most cases. Here we present a case that presented as pelvic malignancy and was diagnosed as pelvic actinomycosis post-operatively.

Case presentation

A 48-year-old Caucasian Turkish woman presented to our clinic with a three-month history of abdominal pain, weight loss and difficulty in defecation. She had used an intra-uterine device for 16 years, however it had recently been removed. The rectosigmoidoscopy revealed narrowing of the lumen at 12 cm due to a mass lesion either in the wall or due to an extrinsic lesion that prevented the passage of the endoscope. On examination, there was no gynecological pathology. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a mass, measuring 5.5 × 4 cm attached to the rectum posterior to the uterus. The ureter on that side was dilated. Surgically there was a pelvic mass adhered to the rectum and uterine adnexes, measuring 10 × 12 cm. It originated from uterine adnexes, particularly ones from the left side and formed a conglomerated mass with the uterus and nearby organs; the left ureter was also dilated due to the pelvic mass. Because of concomitant tubal abscess formation and difficulty in dissection planes, total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salphingo-oophorectomy was performed (our patient was 48 years old and had completed her childbearing period). The cytology revealed inflammatory cells with aggregates of Actinomyces. Penicillin therapy was given for six months without any complication.

Conclusions

Pelvic actinomycosis should always be considered in patients with a pelvic mass especially in ones using intra-uterine devices, and who have a history of appendectomy, tonsillectomy or dental infection. Surgeons should be aware of this infection in order to avoid excessive surgical procedures.

Introduction

Actinomycosis is a chronic granulomatous disease caused by any of several anaerobic organisms from the genus Actinomyces. Abdominal disease is usually insidious and is often mistaken for other conditions such as diverticulitis, abscesses, inflammatory bowel disease and malignant tumor, presenting a diagnostic challenge pre-operatively [1]; it is identified post-operatively in most cases [1]. Here, we present a case considered as pelvic malignancy and diagnosed as pelvic actinomycosis post-operatively.

Case presentation

A 48-year-old Caucasian Turkish woman presented to our clinic with a three-month history of abdominal pain, weight loss and difficulty in defecation. She had a 16-year history of intra-uterine device (IUD) use, which had recently been removed. On physical examination, the abdomen was normal, without any mass; on rectal digital examination, there was a rigid, immobile mass in the anterior part of the rectum. Laboratory evaluation showed a white blood cell count of 12,400. A rectosigmoidoscopy revealed narrowing of the lumen at 12 cm due to a mass lesion either in the wall or due to an extrinsic lesion that prevented the passage of the endoscope. Histopathological diagnosis of tissue samples taken from the mucosa of the narrowed lumen was inflammatory pattern. On gynecological examination and endovaginal ultrasound there was no gynecologic pathology. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a mass, measuring 5.5 × 4 cm, attached to the rectum posterior to the uterus. The ureter on that side was dilated (Figure 1).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-1947-5-40/MediaObjects/13256_2009_Article_1410_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Abdominal MRI shows a 5.5 × 4 cm mass near the rectum posterior to the uterus.

We performed an exploratory laparotomy, which showed a pelvic mass adhered to the rectum and uterine adnexes, measuring 10 × 12 cm. It originated from uterine adnexes particularly from the left side and formed a conglomerated mass with the uterus and nearby organs; the left ureter was also dilated due to the pelvic mass. Because of concomitant tubal abscess formation and difficulty in dissection planes, total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salphingo-oophorectomy was performed (our patient was 48-year-old and had completed her childbearing period).

Her post-operative recovery was normal. Cytology revealed inflammatory cells with aggregates of Actinomyces. Penicillin therapy was given for six months without any complication. She is well and has gained weight after one year.

Discussion

Actinomycosis is a chronic granulomatous disease caused by any of several anaerobic organisms from the genus Actinomyces. Although previously thought to be a fungal infection, these organisms are Gram-positive, filamentous bacteria. Disease in humans is most commonly caused by A. israelii[2]. These organisms are not considered particularly virulent pathogens, but rather as opportunistic ones, because infection usually occurs only after disruption of the mucous membranes. The disease spreads by direct extension into surrounding tissues regardless of tissue planes through the formation of sinus tracts that can lead directly to the skin. Typically sulfur granules can drain from these tracts.

Actinomycosis is traditionally divided into three forms: cervicofacial, thoracic, and abdominogenital. The most frequent site of human infection is the cervicofacial area, accounting for about 40 to 50% of cases. Approximately, 15% of actinomycosis occurs in the thorax [2, 3]. Twenty percent of actinomycotic infections occur in the abdomen and pelvis [3, 4]. Pelvic actinomycosis constitutes 3% of all human actinomycotic infections.

Abdominal disease usually results from clinical or sub-clinical disruption of bowel mucosa. It often occurs as a firm mass that appears fixed to the surrounding tissue and can be mistaken for a tumor [46]. Abdominal surgery, ruptured viscus, tubo-ovarian abscess and IUDs are recognized risk factors for abdominal and pelvic actinomycosis [7]. A. israelii infects 1.65% to 11.6% of IUD users, and infection is more common in women who have had an IUD use in situ longer than four years. In females, Actinomyces is thought to be induced by oro-genital contact [8].

When pelvic actinomycosis occurs, it usually causes endometritis, salpingo-oophoritis, or tubo-ovarian abscess and a mass in the adnexa might be palpable, suggesting a pelvic malignancy [6, 9, 10]. Ultimately, extension to the abdominal wall or deep pelvic structures can occur. Primary bowel involvement is rare, although it has increased in frequency over recent years. The most common sites of the disease are the transverse colon and the cecum with the appendix [11, 12].

Diagnosis of actinomycosis can be difficult because of the insidious nature of the infection. Usually, diagnosis is impossible pre-operatively, even after fine-needle aspiration [13]. The finding of sulfur granules from any other site than the tonsils is considered pathogonomonic [14]. Computed tomography- or ultrasound-guided biopsy can be used to obtain material for diagnosis. Occasionally, as in our patient, surgery may be required.

Penicillin is the drug of choice; resistance is rare. High doses must be given for prolonged courses. In those who are allergic to penicillin, options include tetracyclines, erythromycin, doxycycline and clindamycin. However, response to tetracyclines and ciprofloxacin is poor and a beta lactam antibiotic combined with a beta lactamase inhibitor, should be the first choice [15]. Parenteral therapy might be required for severe infection before changing to the oral route. Generally, the disease is treated until there is evidence of complete resolution. Surgery is occasionally required to drain abscesses, but because actinomycotic infection does not follow tissue planes, surgery can be complicated and, if possible, should be delayed at least until after a course of antibiotic use.

Conclusions

Pelvic actinomycosis should always be considered in patients with pelvic mass especially in those using IUD, and who have a history of appendectomy, tonsillectomy or dental infection. Antimicrobial therapy should be initiated following surgery. Surgeons should be aware of this infection in order to avoid excessive surgical procedures.

Consent

The patient provided written consent for the publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the journal's Editor-in-Chief.

Abbreviations

A. israelii

Actinomyces israelii

CT: 

computed tomography

IUD: 

intra-uterine device, MRI: magnetic resonance imaging.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of General Surgery, Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine

References

  1. Koren R, Dekel Y, Ramadan E, Veltman V, Dreznik V: Periappendiceal actinomycosis mimicking malignancy; report of a case. Pathol Res Pract. 2002, 198: 441-443. 10.1078/0344-0338-00279.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennhoff DF: Actinomycosis: diagnosis and therapeutic considerations and a review of 32 cases. Laryngoscope. 1984, 94 (9): 1198-1217. 10.1288/00005537-198409000-00013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Weese WC, Smith IM: A study of 57 cases of actinomycosis over a 36 year period: A diagnostic `failure' with good prognosis after treatment. Arch Intern Med. 1975, 135 (12): 1562-1568. 10.1001/archinte.135.12.1562.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Russo TA: Agents of actinomycosis. Mandel, Douglas and Bennett's principles and practice of infectious disease. Edited by: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R. 1995, New York, Churchill Livingstone, 2280-2286. 4Google Scholar
  5. Wagenlehner FM, Mohren B, Naber KG, Mannl HF: Abdominal actinomycosis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003, 9: 881-885. 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00653.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hinnie J, Jaques BC, Bell E, Hansell DT, Milroy R: Actinomycosis presenting as carcinoma. Postgrad Med J. 1995, 71: 749-750. 10.1136/pgmj.71.842.749.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Schiffer MA, Elguezabal A, Sultana M, Allen AC: Actinomycosis infections associated with intrauterine contraceptive devices. Obstet Gynecol. 1975, 45: 67-72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. McCormick JF, Scorgie RD: Unilateral tubo-ovarin actinomycosis in the presence of an intrauterine device. Am J Clin Pathol. 1977, 68 (5): 622-626.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Valicenti JF, Pappas AA, Graber CD, Williamson HO, Willis NF: Detection and prevalence of IUD-associated actinomyces colonization and related morbidity: a prospective study of 69925 cervical smears. JAMA. 1982, 247: 1149-1152. 10.1001/jama.247.8.1149.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Perlow JH, Wigton T, Yordan EL, Graham J, Wool N, Wilbanks GD: Disseminated pelvic acti- nomycosis presenting as metastatic carcinoma: association with the progestasert intrauterine device. Rev Infect Dis. 1991, 13: 1115-1119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hsiao HL, Shen JT, Yeh HC, Wu WJ, Wang CJ, Huang CH: Intra- and extra-abdominal actinomycosis mimicking urachal tumor in an intrauterine device carrier: a case report. The Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2008, 24 (1): 35-40. 10.1016/S1607-551X(08)70071-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferrari TC, Couto CA, Murta OC, Conceicao SA, Silva RG: Actinomycosis of the colon: a rare form of presentation. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000, 35: 108-109. 10.1080/003655200750024623.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fiorino AS: Intrauterine contraceptive device-associated actinomycotic abscess and actinomyces detection on cervical smear. Obstet Gynecol. 1996, 87: 142-149. 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00350-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Abela J, Sciberras J, Meilak M, Felice AG, Degaetano J: Omental actinomycosis presenting with right lower quadrant abdominal pain. J Clin Pathol. 2004, 57: 671.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith AJ, Hall V, Thakker B, Gemmell CG: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Actinomyces species with 12 antimicrobial agents. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2005, 56 (2): 407-409. 10.1093/jac/dki206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Simsek et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement