Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Salmonella enterica ssp. arizonae infection in a 43-year-old Italian man with hypoglobulinemia: a case report and review of the literature

  • Stefano Di Bella1Email author,
  • Alessandro Capone1,
  • Eugenio Bordi2,
  • Emma Johnson3,
  • Maria Musso1,
  • Simone Topino1,
  • Pasquale Noto1 and
  • Nicola Petrosillo1
Journal of Medical Case Reports20115:323

DOI: 10.1186/1752-1947-5-323

Received: 28 December 2010

Accepted: 22 July 2011

Published: 22 July 2011

Abstract

Introduction

Salmonella enterica ssp. arizonae is an uncommon human pathogen with serious infections reported in immunocompromised hosts. In Europe, only a few cases have been described. Patients with this infection usually have a history of contact with reptiles or travel abroad. We present a case report of infection in a patient with hypoglobulinemia and a literature review.

Case presentation

We describe the case of a 43-year-old Caucasian Italian man with hypoglobulinemia who presented to our hospital with sepsis and diarrhea. A stool culture yielded S. enterica ssp. arizonae. Our patient was treated with oral ciprofloxacin and made a full recovery. We also present a review of the cases of S. enterica ssp. arizonae infections previously reported in Europe.

Conclusions

The majority of infections from S. enterica ssp. arizonae occur in patients who are immunocompromised. Data from the literature suggests that it may be difficult to eradicate the bacteria and thus, prolonged antibiotic courses are often used. It would be advisable for clinicians to investigate for pre-existing immune dysfunction if S. enterica ssp. arizonae is isolated. In Italy, although there have only been a few cases, the likely route of transmission remains unclear and requires further surveillance.

Introduction

Salmonella enterica ssp. arizonae is an uncommon human pathogen with serious human infections reported in hosts with impaired immune function. S. enterica ssp. arizonae infections have been well described in patients resident within the southwestern part of the US and in Mexico, whereas in Europe only a few cases have been reported. Patients with this infection usually have a history of contact with reptiles or travel abroad.

We present a case report of S. enterica ssp. arizonae infection in an adult patient with hypoglobulinemia and literature review of previous cases.

Case presentation

A 43-year-old Caucasian Italian man was admitted to our hospital presenting with fever, mucoid diarrhea and abdominal cramps for the past 20 days. Associated symptoms included malaise and a 5 kg weight loss during this time. During the previous week he had taken paromomycin along with bacitracin and neomycin, with no clinical improvement.

He had been diagnosed with Hodgkin's disease 15 years previously, which was treated with chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplant. Three years ago he had experienced a relapse, which was treated with chemotherapy alone. Since then a residual panhypoglobulinemia had been recorded in our patient. He reported extensive travel to many countries around the world, but not during the last year. He was taking no medications and had no known drug allergies.

On admission he was unwell with fever (38.5°C), hypotension (90/60 mmHg) and signs of dehydration. His lungs were clear and cardiac evaluation was normal. He had abdominal tenderness but there was no organomegaly or masses on palpation. Chest radiograph, abdomen ultrasound and electrocardiogram results showed no abnormalities.

Blood cultures and stool cultures for Salmonella spp., Shigella spp, Campylobacter spp. and Yersinia spp. were sent to our laboratory. Fecal examinations revealed presence of fecal occult blood (+++) and many leukocytes. Investigation for parasites and immunofluorescence for Giardia were negative. Biochemical analysis showed a normal white blood cell count (4.3 × 103 cells/mm3) but revealed very low levels of immunoglobulins: IgG 91 mg/dL (range 800 to 1500 mg/dL), IgA 4 mg/dL (range 90 to 450 mg/dL) and IgM 1 mg/dL (range 60 to 350 mg/dL). Transaminases, renal function and coagulation studies were normal. Inflammatory markers, including erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C reactive protein, were elevated. Blood culture results were negative and supportive therapy with intravenous fluids was started.

On the sixth day of admission, Gram-negative bacilli were isolated from stool cultures and the bioMérieux VITEK® 2 system was used to identify the S. enterica ssp. arizonae. Phenotyping of this Salmonella isolate was also performed by the API 20E system (bioMèrieux), confirming the subspecies.

The bacterium was susceptible to all the tested antibiotics (Table 1). Therefore antimicrobial therapy with oral ciprofloxacin (500 mg every 12 hours) was started, after which there was a rapid improvement in our patient's clinical condition, with complete defervescence and cessation of the diarrhea.
Table 1

Tested antibiotics

Antibiotic

Minimal inhibitory concentration, μg/mL

Sensitivity

Amikacin

≤2

S

Amoxicillin/Clavulanate

≤2

S

Ampicillin

≤2

S

Cefepime

≤1

S

Cefotaxime

≤1

S

Ceftazidime

≤1

S

Ciprofloxacin

≤0.25

S

Ertapenem

≤0.5

S

Gentamicin

≤1

S

Imipenem

≤1

S

Levofloxacin

≤0.12

S

Meropenem

≤0.25

S

Piperacillin/Tazobactam

≤4

S

Tobramycin

≤1

S

Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole

≤20

S

S = sensitive; I = intermediate; R = resistant.

Due to the severe humoral immunodeficiency in our patient, ciprofloxacin was continued for a total of 28 days. Our rationale was the evidence in the literature that suggests possible later relapse if short antibiotic treatment courses are used [1]. He continued to improve and fecal cultures taken one week and two weeks after the discontinuation of antibiotic therapy were negative.

Discussion

Salmonella spp. are Gram-negative bacilli and members of the Enterobacteriaceae family. They are documented to be pathogens that cause a spectrum of diseases in humans and animals, including domesticated and wild mammals, reptiles, birds, and insects. Salmonella spp. infections are caused by consumption of contaminated food, person-to-person transmission, waterborne transmission and numerous environmental and animal exposures.

S. enterica ssp. arizonae is one of the less common subspecies of Salmonella. Like many non-typhoidal salmonellae, it is mostly found in animal species (commonly reptiles) and only occasionally infects humans. Snakes appear to be important carriers of this bacterium, with as many as 78.8% harboring the organism [2].

S. enterica ssp. arizonae can be difficult to identify due to their distinguishing biochemical features, which include the ability to utilize malonate, liquefy gelatin and the inability to grow in the presence of KCN (potassium cyanide). Isolation of S. enterica ssp. arizonae from the stools is difficult as some strains ferment lactose within 48 hours (approximately 15%) and they may be routinely discarded as non-pathogens. However the presence of hydrogen sulfide is an important diagnostic clue during routine screening [3].

This Salmonella isolate did not ferment lactose within the first 24 hours so it was further investigated as a Salmonella species. However, it is prudent, particularly in patients who are immunosuppressed presenting with fever and diarrhea, that coliforms of potential significance are identified where possible. The use of commercial identification kits or automated systems such as VITEK 2, may be necessary.

Since it is becoming increasingly common to keep reptiles as pets, it appears that the incidence of infection with S. enterica ssp. arizonae is increasing [1]. The organism is part of the normal reptile intestinal flora but can cause disease in monotremes, turkeys, chickens, goats, and humans [4]. S. enterica ssp. arizonae enteritis or systemic infections have been well described in patients resident in the southern states of the USA [5], whereas in Europe it is much rarer, with only a few cases reported in the literature [4, 617]. Many cases reported in the US-Mexican border region were related to the use of rattlesnake products (capsules composed of a powder of dried, crushed snake) as an alternative form of medical treatment [5]. This is a common practice in Mexican folk remedies. Rattlesnake capsules are easily obtained in Mexico without a prescription [5].

Most cases of invasive S. enterica ssp. arizonae infection have been either in younger patients or those with underlying diseases including collagen vascular diseases, malignancy, organ transplantation and HIV infection [18]. This case highlights, once again, the association between the immunocompromised host and increased susceptibility to S. enterica ssp. arizonae.

We performed a review of the literature available using the PubMed database, searching for cases of S. enterica ssp. arizonae infections reported in Europe. We found 16 articles from 1992 to 2010. Features of the reported cases are presented in Table 2[4, 617].
Table 2

European cases of Salmonella enterica ssp. arizonae infection

Reference (first author/year)

Country

Type of infection (no. of cases)

Possible exposure

Specimens

Underlying conditions

Aiken, 2010 [5]

UK

Unknown (3)

Reptiles (two patients), not reported (one patient)

Not reported

Not reported

Schneider, 2009 [6]

France

Septic arthritis (1)

Snake

Synovial fluid

Young age

Bertrand, 2008 [7]

Belgium

Not reported (3)

Snakes (three patients)

Not reported

Young age (two patients), dialytic treatment (one patient)

 

Netherlands

Not reported (16)

Reptiles (most patients)

Not reported

Not reported

 

Germany

Not reported (2)

Snakes (two patients)

Not reported

Young age (one patient), unknown (one patient)

 

Ireland

Not reported (1)

Snake

Not reported

Young age

Starakis, 2007 [8]

Greece

Endocarditis (1)

Vegetables contaminated with turtles feces

Blood

Sickle cell disease, secondary hemochromatosis

Ozdemir, 2006 [9]

Turkey

Sepsis (1)

Unknown

Blood

AIDS

Foster, 2005 [10]

UK

Gastroenteritis (1)

Reptiles

Stools

Young age

Salavert, 2002 [11]

Spain

Abdominal abscess (1)

Veterinarian patient

Pericardial effusion, pericardial biopsy

Obesity

Catani, 2002 [12]

Italy

Pericarditis (1)

Travels

Pus

Chronic renal failure on dialytic treatment

Carfagna, 1998* [13]; Galiè, 1997* [14]

Italy

Severe sepsis (1)

Travels

Blood

Idiopathic CD4+ lymphocytopenia

Carfagna, 1998 [13]

Italy

Septic shock (1)

Travels

Brain and lungs, autoptic specimens

Chronic lymphatic leukemia on cytostatic treatment

Sanyal, 1997 [15]

UK

Gastroenteritis (1)

Snakes

Stools

Young age, Netherton's syndrome

Buck, 1997 [16]

UK

Gastroenteritis (1)

Reptiles (snake)

Stools

Young age

Hall, 1992 [17]

UK (66 cases from 1966 to 1990)

Enteritis (55), symptomless (6), unknown (3)

Travels 23 patients (35%), terrapins two patients, snakes 11 patients

Blood (two patients), stools (66 patients)

49% of infections occurred in babies and young children

*Same clinical case.

In the cases reported in Europe, S. enterica ssp. arizonae infections are frequently associated with reptile exposure and underlying diseases, similar to those found in North-Central America. However, in Italy only three cases of this infection have been reported but none described any contact with reptiles.

This is the fourth case reported in Italy and, indeed, our patient also had no history of contact with reptiles. In a study conducted in UK from 1966 to 1990, 12 isolations of S. enterica ssp. arizonae were derived from human foods and, among these, seven isolates were from imported Italian pasta [17]. A recent study detected S. enterica ssp. arizonae from Pecorino Abruzzese, a traditional cheese produced in Central Italy [19]. Therefore, it is possible that our patient contracted the bacteria from the ingestion of contaminated food.

S. enterica ssp. arizonae has been found to be susceptible to commonly prescribed antibiotics in several of the case reports, as was the strain isolated from our patient.

Conclusions

The isolation of S. enterica ssp. arizonae is commonly associated with a deficit of the immune status, as in the case of our patient. Indeed, the great majority of infections from S. enterica ssp. arizonae occur in patients who present with underlying medical conditions.

Data from the literature suggest that, for patients who are immunocompromised, it may be more difficult to eradicate the bacteria and thus prolonged antibiotic courses (> 14 days) are often advisable. The absence of recurrence in our patient suggests that 28 days was an appropriate course length.

In conclusion, although infection from S. enterica ssp. arizonae is rare, it is most prevalent in patients of a younger age or those with underlying diseases. Therefore, it would be advisable for clinicians to investigate for pre-existing immune dysfunction if S. enterica ssp. arizonae is isolated. Finally, in Italy, although there have only been a few cases, the likely route of transmission remains unclear and requires further surveillance.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from Ricerca Corrente Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Second Infectious Diseases Division, National Institute for Infectious Diseases
(2)
Microbiology Laboratory, National Institute for Infectious Diseases
(3)
Clinical Microbiology Registrar, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Trust

References

  1. Bhatt BD, Zuckerman MJ, Foland JA, Polly SM, Marwah RK: Disseminated Salmonella arizona infection associated with rattlesnake meat ingestion. Am J Gastroenterol. 1989, 84: 433-435.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Habermalz D, Pietzsch O: Identification of arizona bacteria. A contribution to the problem of salmonella infections among reptiles and amphibians in zoological gardens. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A. 1973, 225: 323-42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Winn W, Allen SD, Allen S, Janda W, Koneman EW, Schreckenberger PC, Procop GW, Woods GL: Koneman's Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 2006, Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 6Google Scholar
  4. Aiken AM, Lane C, Adak GK: Risk of Salmonella infection with exposure to reptiles in England, 2004-2007. Euro Surveill. 2010, 15: 19581-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Casner PR, Zuckerman MJ: Salmonella arizonae in patients with AIDS along the U.S.-Mexican border. N Engl J Med. 1990, 323: 198-199.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Schneider L, Ehlinger M, Stanchina C, Giacomelli MC, Gicquel P, Karger C, Clavert JM: Salmonella enterica subsp. arizonae bone and joints sepsis. A case report and literature review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009, 95: 237-242. 10.1016/j.otsr.2008.09.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Editorial team, Bertrand S, Rimhanen-Finne R, Weill FX, Rabsch W, Thornton L, Perevoscikovs J, van Pelt W, Heck M: Salmonella infections associated with reptiles: the current situation in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2008, 13: 18902.Google Scholar
  8. Starakis I, Siagris D, Karatza C, Solomou H, Bassaris H: Endocarditis due to Salmonella enterica subsp. arizonae in a patient with sickle cell disease: a case report and review of the literature. Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets. 2007, 7: 199-204. 10.2174/187152907781745242.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ozdemir D, Sahin I, Sencan I: Salmonella arizonae bacteraemia in a Turkish patient with AIDS but no history of contact with reptiles. Scand J Infect Dis. 2006, 38: 237-238. 10.1080/00365540500348994.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Foster N, Kerr K: The snake in the grass--Salmonella arizonae gastroenteritis in a reptile handler. Acta Paediatr. 2005, 94: 1165-1166. 10.1080/08035250510040359.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Salavert M, Navarro V, Roig P: Purulent pericarditis due to Salmonella enterica subsp. arizonae. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2002, 20: 47-49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Catani M, De Milito R, Intrieri F, Fidente D, Venditti M, Manili G, Siani A, Capitano S: Systemic Salmonella arizona infection: description of a rare surgical case. Minerva Chir. 2004, 59: 75-78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Carfagna P, Brandimarte C, Bianco G, Galiè M, Paris A, Venditti M: Systemic Salmonella arizonae infections in patients with a deficiency of cell-mediated immunity. A report of 2 cases and a review of the literature. Recenti Prog Med. 1998, 89: 632-636.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Galiè M, Cassone M, Ausiello C, Serra P: Idiopathic CD4+ T-lymphocyte deficiency: the clinical evolution of a case. Ann Ital Med Int. 1997, 12: 233-237.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sanyal D, Douglas T, Roberts R: Salmonella infection acquired from reptilian pets. Arch Dis Child. 1997, 77: 345-346. 10.1136/adc.77.4.345.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Buck JJ, Nicholls SW: Salmonella arizona enterocolitis acquired by an infant from a pet snake. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1997, 25: 248-249.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hall ML, Rowe B: Salmonella arizonae in the United Kingdom from 1966 to 1990. Epidemiol Infect. 1992, 108: 59-65. 10.1017/S0950268800049505.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoag JB, Sessler CN: A comprehensive review of disseminated Salmonella arizona infection with an illustrative case presentation. South Med J. 2005, 98: 1123-1129. 10.1097/01.smj.0000177346.07719.00.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Chaves-López C, De Angelis M, Martuscelli M, Serio A, Paparella A, Suzzi G: Characterization of the Enterobacteriaceae isolated from an artisanal Italian ewe's cheese (Pecorino Abruzzese). J Appl Microbiol. 2006, 101: 353-360. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02941.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Di Bella et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement