Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
31 Jul 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
2 Aug 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Cannon |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
2 Aug 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
10 Aug 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Cannon |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
10 Aug 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
17 Aug 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Cannon |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
17 Aug 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
14 Sep 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nathan Radcliffe |
25 Nov 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - marlene moster |
10 Dec 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Cannon |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
10 Dec 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
23 Dec 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Cannon |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
23 Dec 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
4 Feb 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Cannon |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
4 Feb 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
7 Feb 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - marlene moster |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
4 Mar 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Cannon |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
4 Mar 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
12 Mar 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Cannon |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
12 Mar 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
13 Mar 2008 | Editorially accepted | |
13 Mar 2008 | Article published | 10.1186/1752-1947-2-81 |
You can find further information about peer review here.