Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Allergic enterocolitis and protein-losing enteropathy as the presentations of manganese leak from an ingested disk battery: A case report

Journal of Medical Case Reports20082:286

DOI: 10.1186/1752-1947-2-286

Received: 13 December 2007

Accepted: 27 August 2008

Published: 27 August 2008

Abstract

Introduction

Disk battery ingestions can lead to serious complications including airway or digestive tract perforation, blood vessel erosions, mediastinitis, and stricture formation.

Case presentation

We report a 20-month-old Caucasian child who developed eosinophilic enterocolitis and subsequent protein-losing enteropathy from manganese that leaked from a lithium disk battery. The disk battery was impacted in her esophagus for 10 days resulting in battery corrosion. We postulate that this patient's symptoms were due to a manganese leak from the 'retained' disk battery; this resulted in an allergic response in her gut and protein-losing enteropathy. Her symptoms improved gradually over the next 2 weeks with conservative management.

Conclusion

This is the first case report to highlight the potential complication of allergic enterocolitis and protein-losing enteropathy secondary to ingested manganese. Clinicians should be vigilant about this rare complication in managing patients with disk battery ingestions.

Introduction

Lithium batteries are used in many portable consumer electronic devices (Fig. 1). The most common type of lithium cell used in consumer applications consists of lithium and manganese (Mn). Disk battery ingestions can lead to serious complications including aerodigestive tract perforation, vessel erosion, mediastinitis, and stricture formation [1]. Mercury batteries have been reported to cause more severe complications including acute poisoning [2], but none of the disk batteries have been reported to cause protein losing-enteropathy. We report a case in which the manganese in a lithium-manganese disk battery impacted in the esophagus presumably led to eosinophilic enterocolitis and severe protein-losing enteropathy.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-1947-2-286/MediaObjects/13256_2007_Article_473_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Lithium disk battery.

Case presentation

A 20-month-old Caucasian child presented with a 10-day history of vomiting and solid food refusal. Her chest X-ray showed a disk battery impaction in the upper esophagus. A corroded lithium-manganese battery was retrieved with a flexible laryngoscope 10 days after ingestion. The patient was transferred to our institution for further monitoring. Her physical examination and laboratory tests on admission were normal, except for an albumin of 2.7 g/dL (normal 3.8 to 5.4 g/dL) which had dropped from 4.3 g/dL on the day of battery removal. She had been on a regular diet until 10 days before admission. An esophagogram revealed no perforations.

A week following removal of the battery, she continued to refuse foods. An upper endoscopy was performed that revealed non-circumferential ulceration in the upper esophagus but no biopsies were performed at that time. Her stomach and duodenum were grossly normal at that time. A nasogastric (NG) tube was placed and feeding was started. Subsequently, the protein loss worsened and her serum albumin dropped to 1.1 g/dL (normal 3.8 to 5.4 g/dL). The urinalysis was normal and fecal alpha-1 antitrypsin level was 464 mg/g (normal <2 mg/g dry stool). A computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen, chest, and pelvis was performed because of persistent abdominal distention and feeding intolerance; this showed bilateral pleural effusions and moderate ascites. She had a normal echocardiogram and liver function tests. She was diagnosed with protein-losing enteropathy. Albumin 25% was started to maintain albumin at a level of >2 g/dL. A colonoscopy and repeat endoscopy were performed due to her protein-losing enteropathy; this showed complete healing of the previous esophageal ulceration, but with findings of diffuse enteritis and colitis. Small bowel biopsies were taken from the duodenum and terminal ileum. Histology revealed mild eosinophilic esophagitis and moderate eosinophilic enterocolitis (Fig. 2). In addition, the patient developed peripheral eosinophilia of 10.5% compared to 2.9% on admission. Her symptoms improved, and her albumin and eosinophilia normalized gradually over the next 2 weeks with conservative support and no steroids.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-1947-2-286/MediaObjects/13256_2007_Article_473_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Colonoscopic biopsy showing eosinophilic infiltration of crypts in transverse colon.

At 6 months follow-up, the patient has remained well, with normal albumin levels and no symptoms of protein-losing enteropathy. She developed an upper esophageal stricture that required recurrent dilatation and steroid injections. Her most recent endoscopic biopsies showed moderate eosinophils in the esophageal mucosa. We postulate that this patient's symptoms were due to a manganese leak from the 'retained' corroded disk battery before or during the process of removal from the esophagus; this caused an allergic response in her gut resulting in a protein-losing enteropathy.

Discussion

The best known manifestations of chronic Mn exposure are neurological symptoms such as hypokinesia, rigidity and tremor that resemble Parkinson's disease [3]. Rarely, allergic responses have been described as well. Metal allergy to stainless steel wire containing Mn has been reported after coronary artery bypass grafting. A refractory pruritic erythematous wheal over the body with positive Mn patch testing and peripheral eosinophilia proved this to be a systemic allergic reaction to Mn [4]. Mn used in the manufacture of dental prosthesis has also been reported to cause contact dermatitis, manifested by diffuse oral edema, erythema and ulcerations; this was confirmed by positive patch testing [5, 6].

Epidemiological studies have reported an acute impact of particulate Mn on the pulmonary system, including reversible decrement of pulmonary functions and increase in bronchial hyperreactivity [7, 8]. In children, peak expiratory flow was decreased with a high concentration of Mn in the air, suggesting an obstructive allergic response rather than restrictive airway disease [9]. Exposure to high inhaled Mn concentrations has demonstrated an increased incidence of cough, rhinitis, bronchitis, and pneumonitis [10]. A study in rhesus monkeys documented subacute bronchiolitis and alveolar duct inflammation with lymphocytes, neutrophils, and a few eosinophils following inhalational exposure to Mn [11]. In general, serum or blood Mn does not serve as a reliable indicator of the total body burden of Mn because of its intracellular distribution and relatively short half-life [12].

We postulate that our patient developed an allergic enterocolitis and protein losing enteropathy in response to the Mn exposure in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The ingested battery was composed of lithium perchlorate and manganese dioxide. The possibility that some other component of the battery could have contributed to the pathogenesis cannot be ruled out, but in the literature, Mn is the only constituent that has been attributed to the allergic responses. This is supported by the previously suggested evidence that Mn can cause rhinitis, pneumonitis, and bronchial hyperreactivity. Manganese exposure from a cardiac stenting wire and dental prosthesis has also caused allergic symptoms with peripheral eosinophilia. Our patient's most recent esophageal biopsies suggest that she either had a baseline mild asymptomatic eosinophilic esophagitis that acutely worsened with exposure to Mn or the Mn was a trigger to her eosinophilic esophagitis.

Conclusion

This case shows strong circumstantial evidence that the eosinophilic enterocolitis and protein-losing enteropathy were caused by the Mn leak from a retained disk battery; she was completely asymptomatic before battery ingestion with normal albumin levels and eosinophil counts before battery removal. Additionally, there was complete resolution without any treatment aside from removal of the Mn-containing disk battery. Clinicians should be vigilant about this rare complication while managing children with ingested disk batteries as symptoms might not appear immediately after battery removal.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the parent for publication of this case report, as the child was a minor. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Abbreviations

CT: 

Computed Tomography

GI: 

Gastrointestinal

Mn: 

Manganese

NG: 

Nasogastric.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, The Medical College of Wisconsin

References

  1. Temple DM, McNeese MC: Hazards of battery ingestion. Pediatrics. 1983, 71 (1): 100-103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Reilly DT: Mercury battery ingestion. Br Med J. 1979, 1 (6167): 859-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Pal PK, Samii A, Calne DB: Manganese neurotoxicity: a review of clinical features, imaging and pathology. Neurotoxicology. 1999, 20 (2–3): 227-238.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Takazawa K, Ishikawa N, Miyagawa H, Yamamoto T, Hariya A, Dohi S: Metal allergy to stainless steel wire after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Artif Organs. 2003, 6 (1): 71-72. 10.1007/s100470300011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Pardo J, Rodriguez-Serna M, De La Cuadra J, Fortea JM: Allergic contact stomatitis due to manganese in a dental prosthesis. Contact Dermatitis. 2004, 50 (1): 41-10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00271b.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Menezes LM, Campos LC, Quintao CC, Bolognese AM: Hypersensitivity to metals in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004, 126 (1): 58-64. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.05.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Boezen M, Schouten J, Rijcken B, Vonk J, Gerritsen J, Zee van der S, Hoek G, Brunekreef B, Postma D: Peak expiratory flow variability, bronchial responsiveness, and susceptibility to ambient air pollution in adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998, 158 (6): 1848-1854.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sharma M, Kumar VN, Katiyar SK, Sharma R, Shukla BP, Sengupta B: Effects of particulate air pollution on the respiratory health of subjects who live in three areas in Kanpur, India. Arch Environ Health. 2004, 59 (7): 348-358. 10.3200/AEOH.59.7.348-358.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hong YC, Hwang SS, Kim JH, Lee KH, Lee HJ, Lee KH, Yu SD, Kim DS: Metals in particulate pollutants affect peak expiratory flow of school children. Environ Health Perspect. 2007, 115 (3): 430-434.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Roels H, Lauwerys R, Buchet JP, Genet P, Sarhan MJ, Hanotiau I, de Fays M, Bernard A, Stanescu D: Epidemiological survey among workers exposed to manganese: effects on lung, central nervous system, and some biological indices. Am J Ind Med. 1987, 11 (3): 307-327. 10.1002/ajim.4700110308.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dorman DC, Struve MF, Gross EA, Wong BA, Howroyd PC: Sub-chronic inhalation of high concentrations of manganese sulfate induces lower airway pathology in rhesus monkeys. Respir Res. 2005, 6: 121-10.1186/1465-9921-6-121.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Lu L, Zhang LL, Li GJ, Guo W, Liang W, Zheng W: Alteration of serum concentrations of manganese, iron, ferritin, and transferrin receptor following exposure to welding fumes among career welders. Neurotoxicology. 2005, 26 (2): 257-265. 10.1016/j.neuro.2004.09.001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Altaf et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.