Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Thread embedded into penile tissue over time as an unusual hair thread tourniquet injury to the penis: a case report

Journal of Medical Case Reports20082:230

DOI: 10.1186/1752-1947-2-230

Received: 02 January 2008

Accepted: 16 July 2008

Published: 16 July 2008

Abstract

Introduction

Hair thread tourniquet syndrome has been recognized since the 1960s. Since then, sporadic reports have appeared in the literature describing different degrees of strangulation and/or amputation of the penis caused by a hair thread being inadvertently tied around the penis.

Case presentation

A 9-year-old boy presented with a 3-year history of hair thread tourniquet injury to his penis. Instead of the usual strangulation or amputation, the tourniquet had become embedded into the penile tissue, manifesting with exuberant granulation tissue and a tight urethral stricture. At surgery, the intact tourniquet was still in place, embedded in dense fibrous tissue and associated with a dense urethral fibrosis which measured about 2 cm long. The tourniquet was divided and removed, the fibrotic urethra excised and a distal penile pedicled skin flap used to perform a single-stage substitution urethroplasty. The patient has been voiding well for 28 months.

Conclusion

This case is unusual and is the first report of its kind. It is also the first report of a hair thread tourniquet as the cause of pediatric penile injury in Nigeria.

Introduction

Hair thread tourniquet syndrome has been recognized since the 1960s when a strangulating strand of hair was reported around the penis [1]. The patient usually presents acutely and responds well to removal of the tourniquet [2]. When there is a delay in presentation, partial amputation of the penis is often seen, with varying degrees of urethral transection [3].

We report the case of a 9-year-old boy who had a hair thread tourniquet on his penis for 3 years, but presented with only urethral stricture and granulation tissue and no strangulation or amputation of the penis.

Case presentation

A 9-year-old boy was seen at our urology outpatients' clinic in September 2005 with a 3-year history of straining at micturition and fleshy non-healing wounds located on the dorsolateral aspects of his penile shaft associated with minimal purulent discharge. The amount of discharge was not related to the act of voiding. He lived with his grandmother, who had tried topical applications of native medications without much improvement. On clinical examination, he had a ring scar located at the midshaft of his penis. The scar did not appear to be constrictive. There was no change in skin coloration or texture and no alteration of sensation distal to the scar. He also had minimal exuberant granulation tissue on the dorsolateral aspects of the scar associated with very minimal purulent discharge (Figure 1). There was a palpable dense periurethral induration beneath the scar. The bladder was not distended. His blood urea nitrogen, electrolytes and serum creatinine were normal. His retrograde urethrogram revealed a tight ring stricture in the middle third of his urethra (Figure 2).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-1947-2-230/MediaObjects/13256_2008_Article_417_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

The ring scar on the penis and the exuberant granulation on the dorsolateral aspects. The skin distal to the scar appears normal.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-1947-2-230/MediaObjects/13256_2008_Article_417_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

A retrograde urethrogram showing a tight ring urethral stricture in the middle third of the penile urethra.

At surgery under general anesthesia, a hemostatic tourniquet was applied to the root of his penis. A degloving incision was made in his old circumcision scar and the penile skin was dissected off the corporeal bodies towards the base of the penis. At the site of the ring scar, an intact black hair thread tourniquet was seen encased in dense fibrous tissue and binding the penile skin to the corporeal bodies. The hair thread tourniquet was divided and removed (Figure 3), and the penile skin sharply dissected off the corporeal bodies circumferentially at that location. A 2 cm urethral stricture was identified and excised, but when the urethral ends were temporarily pulled together, the penile shaft was severely bowed into a ventral chordee. A pedicled penile flap was therefore taken from the distal aspect of his penile skin and used for reconstructing the urethra over an indwelling urethral catheter after the method described by Quartey [4]. The procedure was completed by closing the circumcoronal wound, leaving a circumcision-like wound. A firm dressing was applied before the hemostatic tourniquet at the root of the penis was removed. His urethral catheter was removed 3 weeks postoperative. The patient's financial circumstances did not allow postoperative retrograde urethrography. He has since been voiding well and has been followed-up for 28 months.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1752-1947-2-230/MediaObjects/13256_2008_Article_417_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

The black hair thread removed from the penis in the patient, placed on a piece of gauze swab.

Discussion

Hair thread tourniquet syndrome usually occurs in infants and is presumed to be accidental [2, 5]. However, Barton et al., in 1988, reported a case of hair thread tourniquet syndrome due to child abuse [6]. In the case reported here, a 9-year-old boy presented with a 3-year history, placing the incident most probably at age 6 years. He could not recollect the circumstances surrounding the tourniquet application, who had applied it and why it had been applied. He had not even been aware that there was a tourniquet on his penis.

The mechanism of injury in hair thread tourniquet is ischemia in the parts distal to the site of tourniquet application. Presentation in the acute state is usual, with swelling, erythema, circumferential constriction and distal edema [2] with little discomfort to the child [5]. This aspect of there being minimal discomfort to the child as well as his living with an aged grandmother whose initial recourse had been to native medication for 3 years may have contributed to his late presentation. If the tourniquet is not removed early, there may be progression to skin infection and ulceration, but removal of the constriction at this stage prevents long-term complications. In cases that are not recognized early, the dorsal neurovascular bundle may be transected, leading to the loss of sensation over the glans penis. The corpus spongiosum may become transected, leading to urethrocutaneous fistulation. The corpora carvanosa may also become transected, leading to partial or total amputation of the penis distal to the tourniquet [79].

It is worthy of note that even though the patient in the case presented here had his hair thread tourniquet for more than 3 years, there were no ischemic skin changes, no loss of sensation over the glans penis, and no urethrocutaneous fistulae. It is particularly unusual in that there was no degree of amputation of the part distal to the tourniquet. There was not even a discernible depression along the site of the tourniquet. The ultimate location of the hair thread was immediately subcutaneous, as if the tourniquet had 'sunk in' through the skin, embedded in fibrous tissue, with the intact dorsal neurovascular bundle running deeply in this. The granulation tissue associated with the ring scar reached only as far as the dense fibrous tissue surrounding the hair thread and did not seem to be related to the urethra.

A review of previously published reports from Nigeria did not reveal the hair thread as a cause of pediatric penile injuries in this region [10, 11].

Conclusion

The reason why this patient presented in this manner is not immediately apparent. It could be postulated that the hair thread tourniquet was not too tightly applied in the first place. The degree of ischemia was therefore not extreme and the associated tissue damage was minimal. Over the years, as the patient's penis grew, the intact tourniquet was gradually incorporated into the substance of the penis.

This case is peculiar and is the first report of its kind. It is also the first report from Nigeria of a hair thread tourniquet being the cause of pediatric penile injury.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's next-of-kin for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Urology Division, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, University College Hospital

References

  1. Bacon JL, Burals JT: Hair thread tourniquet syndrome in adolescents: a presentation and review of the literature. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2005, 18: 155-156. 10.1016/j.jpag.2005.03.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Vâquez Rueda F, Núñez Núñez R, Gómez Meleno P, Blesa Sánchez E: The hair thread tourniquet syndrome of the toes and penis. An Esp Pediatr. 1996, 44: 17-20.Google Scholar
  3. Imran D, Ahmed J, Shah T: Delayed presentation of pediatric penile constrictive band injury. Br J Plast Surg. 2003, 56: 300-302. 10.1016/S0007-1226(03)00113-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Quartey JK: One-stage penile/preputial island flap urethroplasty for urethral stricture. J Urol. 1985, 134: 474-475.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Thomas AJ, Timmons JW, Perlmutter AD: Progressive penile amputation. Tourniquet injury secondary to hair. Urology. 1977, 9: 42-44. 10.1016/0090-4295(77)90282-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Barton DJ, Sloan GM, Nichter LS, Reinisch JF: Hair-thread tourniquet syndrome. Pediatrics. 1988, 82: 925-928.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Singh B, Hong K, Sandor HW: Strangulation of the glans by hair. Urology. 1978, 21: 170-172. 10.1016/0090-4295(78)90100-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Jezior JR, Brady JD, Schlossberg SM: Management of penile amputation injuries. World J Surg. 2001, 25: 1602-1609. 10.1007/s00268-001-0157-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Nazir Z, Rasheed K, Moazam F: Penile constrictive band injury. J Pak Med Assoc. 1993, 43: 135-137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Adigun IA, Kuranga SA, Abdulrahaman LO: Grinding machine: friend or foe. West Afr J Med. 2002, 21: 338-340.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ahmed A, Mbibu NH: Aetiology and management of injuries to male external genitalia in Nigeria. Injury. 2008, 39: 128-33. 10.1016/j.injury.2007.02.039. 2007, 15 JuneView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Okeke; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.